MergeOp: Check commit status separately after merge strategies
The updateChangeStatus method was a little weird, basically following disjoint codepaths depending on the value of the boolean dryRun argument. The first time through, which happened immediately after running the submit strategies, might throw exceptions for missing dependencies or other invalid statuses. The second time through, after executing ref updates, was actually responsible for setting the status on the change objects in the database. (It could theoretically throw in the same cases as the first time it was called, but those should have already thrown already so it's essentially dead code.) Split the first set of checks into a new method, checkMergeStrategyResults, that has an explicit name for what it does, and uses the same problem/failFast structure as we've started adopting elsewhere. Change-Id: I3ea6e5a47d3173749773c0cf7fa175c8048b1a0a
This commit is contained in:
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ import com.google.gerrit.reviewdb.client.PatchSet;
|
||||
import com.google.gerrit.reviewdb.client.PatchSetApproval;
|
||||
import com.google.gerrit.reviewdb.client.Project;
|
||||
import com.google.gerrit.server.ApprovalsUtil;
|
||||
import com.google.gerrit.server.git.CommitMergeStatus;
|
||||
import com.google.gerrit.server.notedb.ChangeNotes;
|
||||
import com.google.gwtorm.server.OrmException;
|
||||
import com.google.inject.Inject;
|
||||
@@ -117,7 +116,8 @@ public class SubmitOnPushIT extends AbstractDaemonTest {
|
||||
push("refs/for/master%submit", "other change", "a.txt", "other content");
|
||||
r.assertErrorStatus();
|
||||
r.assertChange(Change.Status.NEW, null);
|
||||
r.assertMessage(CommitMergeStatus.PATH_CONFLICT.getMessage());
|
||||
r.assertMessage("Change " + r.getChange().getId()
|
||||
+ ": change could not be merged due to a path conflict.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@@ -77,8 +77,9 @@ public abstract class AbstractSubmitByMerge extends AbstractSubmit {
|
||||
PushOneCommit.Result change2 =
|
||||
createChange("Change 2", "a.txt", "other content");
|
||||
submitWithConflict(change2.getChangeId(),
|
||||
"Cannot merge " + change2.getCommit().name() + "\n" +
|
||||
"Change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\n" +
|
||||
"Failed to submit 1 change due to the following problems:\n" +
|
||||
"Change " + change2.getChange().getId() + ": " +
|
||||
"Change could not be merged due to a path conflict. " +
|
||||
"Please rebase the change locally " +
|
||||
"and upload the rebased commit for review.");
|
||||
assertThat(getRemoteHead()).isEqualTo(oldHead);
|
||||
|
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ package com.google.gerrit.acceptance.rest.change;
|
||||
|
||||
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
|
||||
|
||||
import com.google.common.collect.Iterables;
|
||||
import com.google.gerrit.acceptance.PushOneCommit;
|
||||
import com.google.gerrit.acceptance.TestProjectInput;
|
||||
import com.google.gerrit.extensions.client.ChangeStatus;
|
||||
@@ -106,9 +105,9 @@ public class SubmitByCherryPickIT extends AbstractSubmit {
|
||||
PushOneCommit.Result change2 =
|
||||
createChange("Change 2", "a.txt", "other content");
|
||||
submitWithConflict(change2.getChangeId(),
|
||||
"Cannot merge " + change2.getCommitId().name() + "\n" +
|
||||
"Change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\n" +
|
||||
"Please rebase the change locally and " +
|
||||
"Failed to submit 1 change due to the following problems:\n" +
|
||||
"Change " + change2.getChange().getId() + ": Change could not be " +
|
||||
"merged due to a path conflict. Please rebase the change locally and " +
|
||||
"upload the rebased commit for review.");
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(getRemoteHead()).isEqualTo(oldHead);
|
||||
@@ -151,9 +150,9 @@ public class SubmitByCherryPickIT extends AbstractSubmit {
|
||||
PushOneCommit.Result change3 =
|
||||
createChange("Change 3", "b.txt", "different content");
|
||||
submitWithConflict(change3.getChangeId(),
|
||||
"Cannot merge " + change3.getCommitId().name() + "\n" +
|
||||
"Change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\n" +
|
||||
"Please rebase the change locally and " +
|
||||
"Failed to submit 1 change due to the following problems:\n" +
|
||||
"Change " + change3.getChange().getId() + ": Change could not be " +
|
||||
"merged due to a path conflict. Please rebase the change locally and " +
|
||||
"upload the rebased commit for review.");
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(getRemoteHead()).isEqualTo(oldHead);
|
||||
@@ -227,15 +226,13 @@ public class SubmitByCherryPickIT extends AbstractSubmit {
|
||||
// Submit fails; change3 contains the delta "b1" -> "b2", which cannot be
|
||||
// applied against tip.
|
||||
submitWithConflict(change3.getChangeId(),
|
||||
"Cannot merge " + change3.getCommitId().name() + "\n" +
|
||||
"Change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\n" +
|
||||
"Please rebase the change locally and " +
|
||||
"Failed to submit 1 change due to the following problems:\n" +
|
||||
"Change " + change3.getChange().getId() + ": Change could not be " +
|
||||
"merged due to a path conflict. Please rebase the change locally and " +
|
||||
"upload the rebased commit for review.");
|
||||
|
||||
ChangeInfo info3 = get(change3.getChangeId(), ListChangesOption.MESSAGES);
|
||||
assertThat(info3.status).isEqualTo(ChangeStatus.NEW);
|
||||
assertThat(Iterables.getLast(info3.messages).message.toLowerCase())
|
||||
.contains("path conflict");
|
||||
|
||||
// Tip has not changed.
|
||||
List<RevCommit> log = getRemoteLog();
|
||||
|
@@ -100,9 +100,10 @@ public class SubmitByFastForwardIT extends AbstractSubmit {
|
||||
assertThat(info.enabled).isNull();
|
||||
|
||||
submitWithConflict(change2.getChangeId(),
|
||||
"Cannot merge " + change2.getCommitId().name() + "\n" +
|
||||
"Project policy requires all submissions to be a fast-forward.\n\n" +
|
||||
"Please rebase the change locally and upload again for review.");
|
||||
"Failed to submit 1 change due to the following problems:\n" +
|
||||
"Change " + change2.getChange().getId() + ": Project policy requires " +
|
||||
"all submissions to be a fast-forward. Please rebase the change " +
|
||||
"locally and upload again for review.");
|
||||
assertThat(getRemoteHead()).isEqualTo(oldHead);
|
||||
assertSubmitter(change.getChangeId(), 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@@ -181,9 +181,9 @@ public class SubmitByMergeIfNecessaryIT extends AbstractSubmitByMerge {
|
||||
|
||||
if (isSubmitWholeTopicEnabled()) {
|
||||
submitWithConflict(change1b.getChangeId(),
|
||||
"Cannot merge " + change3.getCommit().name() + "\n" +
|
||||
"Change could not be merged due to a path conflict.\n\n" +
|
||||
"Please rebase the change locally " +
|
||||
"Failed to submit 5 changes due to the following problems:\n" +
|
||||
"Change " + change3.getChange().getId() + ": Change could not be " +
|
||||
"merged due to a path conflict. Please rebase the change locally " +
|
||||
"and upload the rebased commit for review.");
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
submit(change1b.getChangeId());
|
||||
@@ -296,7 +296,11 @@ public class SubmitByMergeIfNecessaryIT extends AbstractSubmitByMerge {
|
||||
"a.txt", "1", "a-topic-here");
|
||||
approve(change3b.getChangeId());
|
||||
|
||||
submitWithConflict(change3a.getChangeId(), "Merge Conflict");
|
||||
String cnt = isSubmitWholeTopicEnabled() ? "2 changes" : "1 change";
|
||||
submitWithConflict(change3a.getChangeId(),
|
||||
"Failed to submit " + cnt + " due to the following problems:\n"
|
||||
+ "Change " + change3a.getChange().getId() + ": depends on change that"
|
||||
+ " was not submitted");
|
||||
|
||||
RevCommit tipbranch = getRemoteLog(project, "branch").get(0);
|
||||
assertThat(tipbranch.getShortMessage()).isEqualTo(
|
||||
|
@@ -18,9 +18,12 @@ import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkState;
|
||||
import static com.google.gerrit.server.notedb.ReviewerStateInternal.REVIEWER;
|
||||
|
||||
import com.google.auto.value.AutoValue;
|
||||
import com.google.common.base.CharMatcher;
|
||||
import com.google.common.base.Function;
|
||||
import com.google.common.base.Joiner;
|
||||
import com.google.common.base.Optional;
|
||||
import com.google.common.base.Predicate;
|
||||
import com.google.common.collect.FluentIterable;
|
||||
import com.google.common.collect.HashBasedTable;
|
||||
import com.google.common.collect.HashMultimap;
|
||||
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
|
||||
@@ -495,17 +498,17 @@ public class MergeOp implements AutoCloseable {
|
||||
}
|
||||
failFast(cs); // Done checks that don't involve running submit strategies.
|
||||
|
||||
for (Branch.NameKey branch : cbb.keySet()) {
|
||||
OpenRepo or = openRepo(branch.getParentKey());
|
||||
OpenBranch ob = or.getBranch(branch);
|
||||
BranchBatch submitting = toSubmit.get(branch);
|
||||
SubmitStrategy strategy = createStrategy(or, branch,
|
||||
submitting.submitType(), ob.oldTip, caller);
|
||||
ob.mergeTip = preMerge(strategy, submitting.changes(), ob.oldTip);
|
||||
}
|
||||
checkMergeStrategyResults(cs, toSubmit.values());
|
||||
for (Project.NameKey project : br.keySet()) {
|
||||
OpenRepo or = openRepo(project);
|
||||
for (Branch.NameKey branch : br.get(project)) {
|
||||
OpenBranch ob = or.getBranch(branch);
|
||||
BranchBatch submitting = toSubmit.get(branch);
|
||||
SubmitStrategy strategy = createStrategy(or, branch,
|
||||
submitting.submitType(), ob.oldTip, caller);
|
||||
ob.mergeTip = preMerge(strategy, submitting.changes(), ob.oldTip);
|
||||
updateChangeStatus(ob, submitting.changes(), true, caller);
|
||||
or.ins.flush();
|
||||
}
|
||||
openRepo(project).ins.flush();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Set<Branch.NameKey> done =
|
||||
@@ -519,7 +522,7 @@ public class MergeOp implements AutoCloseable {
|
||||
boolean updated = updateBranch(or, branch, caller);
|
||||
|
||||
BranchBatch submitting = toSubmit.get(branch);
|
||||
updateChangeStatus(ob, submitting.changes(), false, caller);
|
||||
updateChangeStatus(ob, submitting.changes(), caller);
|
||||
updateSubmoduleSubscriptions(ob, subOp);
|
||||
if (updated) {
|
||||
fireRefUpdated(ob);
|
||||
@@ -846,35 +849,85 @@ public class MergeOp implements AutoCloseable {
|
||||
return "";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void updateChangeStatus(OpenBranch ob, List<ChangeData> submitted,
|
||||
boolean dryRun, IdentifiedUser caller) throws NoSuchChangeException,
|
||||
IntegrationException, ResourceConflictException, OrmException {
|
||||
if (!dryRun) {
|
||||
logDebug("Updating change status for {} changes", submitted.size());
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
logDebug("Checking change state for {} changes in a dry run",
|
||||
submitted.size());
|
||||
private Iterable<ChangeData> flattenBatches(Collection<BranchBatch> batches) {
|
||||
return FluentIterable.from(batches)
|
||||
.transformAndConcat(new Function<BranchBatch, List<ChangeData>>() {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public List<ChangeData> apply(BranchBatch batch) {
|
||||
return batch.changes();
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void checkMergeStrategyResults(ChangeSet cs,
|
||||
Collection<BranchBatch> batches) throws ResourceConflictException {
|
||||
for (ChangeData cd : flattenBatches(batches)) {
|
||||
Change.Id id = cd.getId();
|
||||
CodeReviewCommit commit = commits.get(id);
|
||||
CommitMergeStatus s = commit != null ? commit.getStatusCode() : null;
|
||||
if (s == null) {
|
||||
problems.put(id,
|
||||
"internal error: change not processed by merge strategy");
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
switch (s) {
|
||||
case CLEAN_MERGE:
|
||||
case CLEAN_REBASE:
|
||||
case CLEAN_PICK:
|
||||
case ALREADY_MERGED:
|
||||
break; // Merge strategy accepted this change.
|
||||
|
||||
case PATH_CONFLICT:
|
||||
case REBASE_MERGE_CONFLICT:
|
||||
case MANUAL_RECURSIVE_MERGE:
|
||||
case CANNOT_CHERRY_PICK_ROOT:
|
||||
case NOT_FAST_FORWARD:
|
||||
case INVALID_PROJECT_CONFIGURATION:
|
||||
case INVALID_PROJECT_CONFIGURATION_PLUGIN_VALUE_NOT_PERMITTED:
|
||||
case INVALID_PROJECT_CONFIGURATION_PLUGIN_VALUE_NOT_EDITABLE:
|
||||
case INVALID_PROJECT_CONFIGURATION_PARENT_PROJECT_NOT_FOUND:
|
||||
case INVALID_PROJECT_CONFIGURATION_ROOT_PROJECT_CANNOT_HAVE_PARENT:
|
||||
case SETTING_PARENT_PROJECT_ONLY_ALLOWED_BY_ADMIN:
|
||||
// TODO(dborowitz): Reformat these messages to be more appropriate for
|
||||
// short problem descriptions.
|
||||
problems.put(id,
|
||||
CharMatcher.is('\n').collapseFrom(s.getMessage(), ' '));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case MISSING_DEPENDENCY:
|
||||
problems.put(id, "depends on change that was not submitted");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case REVISION_GONE:
|
||||
// TODO(dborowitz): Should no longer be generated by built-in code;
|
||||
// finish removing.
|
||||
throw new IllegalStateException();
|
||||
|
||||
default:
|
||||
problems.put(id, "unspecified merge failure: " + s);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
failFast(cs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void updateChangeStatus(OpenBranch ob, List<ChangeData> submitted,
|
||||
IdentifiedUser caller) throws NoSuchChangeException, IntegrationException,
|
||||
ResourceConflictException, OrmException {
|
||||
logDebug("Updating change status for {} changes", submitted.size());
|
||||
|
||||
for (ChangeData cd : submitted) {
|
||||
Change c = cd.change();
|
||||
CodeReviewCommit commit = commits.get(c.getId());
|
||||
CommitMergeStatus s = commit != null ? commit.getStatusCode() : null;
|
||||
if (s == null) {
|
||||
// Shouldn't ever happen, but leave the change alone. We'll pick
|
||||
// it up on the next pass.
|
||||
//
|
||||
logDebug("Submitted change {} did not appear in set of new commits"
|
||||
+ " produced by merge strategy", c.getId());
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
checkState(s != null,
|
||||
"status not set for change %s; expected to previously fail fast",
|
||||
c.getId());
|
||||
|
||||
if (!dryRun) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
setApproval(cd, caller);
|
||||
} catch (IOException e) {
|
||||
throw new OrmException(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
try {
|
||||
setApproval(cd, caller);
|
||||
} catch (IOException e) {
|
||||
throw new OrmException(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
String txt = s.getMessage();
|
||||
@@ -890,24 +943,18 @@ public class MergeOp implements AutoCloseable {
|
||||
ChangeMessage msg;
|
||||
switch (s) {
|
||||
case CLEAN_MERGE:
|
||||
if (!dryRun) {
|
||||
setMerged(c, message(c, txt + getByAccountName(commit)),
|
||||
mergeResultRev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
setMerged(c, message(c, txt + getByAccountName(commit)),
|
||||
mergeResultRev);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case CLEAN_REBASE:
|
||||
case CLEAN_PICK:
|
||||
if (!dryRun) {
|
||||
setMerged(c, message(c, txt + " as " + commit.name()
|
||||
+ getByAccountName(commit)), mergeResultRev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
setMerged(c, message(c, txt + " as " + commit.name()
|
||||
+ getByAccountName(commit)), mergeResultRev);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case ALREADY_MERGED:
|
||||
if (!dryRun) {
|
||||
setMerged(c, null, mergeResultRev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
setMerged(c, null, mergeResultRev);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case PATH_CONFLICT:
|
||||
|
@@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ import java.util.List;
|
||||
import java.util.Map;
|
||||
import java.util.Set;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
|
||||
import java.util.regex.Matcher;
|
||||
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -270,6 +271,9 @@ public class ReceiveCommits {
|
||||
public RestApiException apply(Exception input) {
|
||||
if (input instanceof RestApiException) {
|
||||
return (RestApiException) input;
|
||||
} else if ((input instanceof ExecutionException)
|
||||
&& (input.getCause() instanceof RestApiException)) {
|
||||
return (RestApiException) input.getCause();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return new RestApiException("Error inserting change/patchset", input);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -844,6 +848,9 @@ public class ReceiveCommits {
|
||||
f.checkedGet();
|
||||
}
|
||||
magicBranch.cmd.setResult(OK);
|
||||
} catch (ResourceConflictException e) {
|
||||
addMessage(e.getMessage());
|
||||
reject(magicBranch.cmd, "conflict");
|
||||
} catch (RestApiException err) {
|
||||
log.error("Can't insert change/patchset for " + project.getName()
|
||||
+ ". " + err.getMessage(), err);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user