Merge "Update testing for OpenDev"
This commit is contained in:
commit
2901f4b87b
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Test Environment
|
||||
################
|
||||
|
||||
This document should give you a good idea of what you can count on
|
||||
in the test environments managed by the Infrastructure team. This
|
||||
in the test environments managed by the OpenDev team. This
|
||||
information may be useful when creating new jobs or debugging existing
|
||||
jobs.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ can change:
|
||||
rebuild the queue without that change, then restart all jobs in the queue
|
||||
with that change evicted.
|
||||
|
||||
Keep in mind that we are dog fooding OpenStack to run OpenStack's CI
|
||||
Keep in mind that we are also dog fooding OpenStack to run OpenStack's CI
|
||||
system. This means that a more reliable OpenStack is able to provide
|
||||
resources to our CI system effectively. Fixing OpenStack in this case
|
||||
is a win win situation.
|
||||
@ -141,28 +141,3 @@ resources quickly.
|
||||
We are also always happy to add resources if they are available, but the
|
||||
priority from the project should be to ensure we are using what we do have
|
||||
responsibly.
|
||||
|
||||
Can my changes skip the check queue?
|
||||
------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The OpenStack project uses a "clean check" approach to keep flaky
|
||||
changes out of the gate. So, a change always needs to pass "check"
|
||||
before it enters "gate" - and if it fails in "gate", it re-enters
|
||||
the "check" pipeline.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
* If your change fails in the gate, then there is an increased chance
|
||||
it is introducing non-deterministic failure behavior so forcing it
|
||||
to go through check again helps make that more apparent.
|
||||
* This avoids also approving changes that have no hope of ever passing
|
||||
due to pep8 or other trivial errors.
|
||||
* It also helps with approving changes that had been sitting around
|
||||
with a 6-month-old passing check.
|
||||
|
||||
Changes in the gate pipeline are prioritized but also serialized, so
|
||||
if a change fails, all tests for changes behind that failing change
|
||||
have to be restarted. If restarts after restarts happen, then
|
||||
resources are never freed up for the check pipeline.
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore, having a stable gate pipeline is crucial - and the "clean
|
||||
check" requirement will help with the stable jobs.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user