Merge "Update project doc to reflect OpenDev changes"

This commit is contained in:
Zuul 2020-03-17 20:22:45 +00:00 committed by Gerrit Code Review
commit 8e45f95748
1 changed files with 98 additions and 68 deletions

View File

@ -1,37 +1,43 @@
:title: Infrastructure Project
:title: OpenDev Project
.. _infra-project:
Infrastructure Project
######################
OpenDev Project
###############
The infrastructure for the OpenStack project itself is run with the
same processes, tools and philosophy as any other OpenStack project.
The infrastructure team is an open meritocracy that welcomes new
members. You can read about the OpenStack way on the wiki:
OpenDev is an evolution of the OpenStack Infrastructure project. The
goal is to make OpenStack's proven software development tools available
for projects outside of OpenStack. We believe that Free Software needs
Free tools and OpenDev provides one such set that has been proven to
work at large and small scales of development.
* https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/How_To_Contribute
* https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Open
* https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance
* https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Programs
The OpenDev team is an open meritocracy that welcomes new members. We
follow OpenStack's `Four Opens <https://www.openstack.org/four-opens/>`_.
Scope
=====
The project infrastructure encompasses all of the systems that are
used in the day to day operation of the OpenStack project as a whole.
This includes development, testing, and collaboration tools. All of
the software that we run is open source, and its configuration is
public. The project still uses a number of systems that do not yet
fall under this umbrella (notably, the main website), but we're
working to incorporate them so that people may just as easily
contribute to those areas. All new services used by the project
should begin as part of the infrastructure project to ensure easy
collaboration from the start.
OpenDev now covers many of the original OpenStack Infrastructure systems,
but not all. The goal is to run any service that has generic applicability
for open and collaborative software development in OpenDev. OpenStack and
other project specific tooling would be managed by those projects outside
of OpenDev.
In particular OpenDev covers the operations and development of code
management systems and collaboration tools. Git repository management, code
review, continuous integration, etherpads, mailing lists, and more are all
within the scope of OpenDev. All of the software we run is open source, and
openly operated through configuration files stored in git.
Contributing
============
.. note::
Until we complete the transition from OpenStack Infra to OpenDev some
communication platforms will remain under "OpenStack". Expect
this list to get smaller over time.
We welcome contributions from new contributors. Reading this
documentation is the first step. You should also join our `mailing list <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra>`_.
@ -42,13 +48,6 @@ Feel free to attend our `weekly IRC meeting
<https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting>`_
on Tuesdays at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting.
Check out our open bugs on `StoryBoard
<https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project_group/55>`_.
We hold regular `bug days
<https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/InfraTeam#Bugs>`_ where we review and
triage bugs.
To read about how our systems are managed and how to view or edit
those configurations, see :ref:`sysadmin`.
@ -61,20 +60,19 @@ And if you have any questions, please ask.
Bugs
====
The infrastructure project maintains a bug list at::
https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project_group/55
The OpenDev project maintains a bug list at:
https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project_group/55
Both defects and new features are tracked in the bug system. A number
of tags are used to indicate relevance to a particular subsystem.
There is also a low-hanging-fruit tag associated with bugs that should
provide a gentle introduction to working on the infrastructure project
provide a gentle introduction to working on the OpenDev project
without needing too much in-depth knowledge or access.
Priority Efforts
================
The infrastructure project designates a small number of efforts
The OpenDev project designates a small number of efforts
underway at any time as priority efforts. These are areas where the
project has decided to focus resources to achieve major initiatives.
These help reviewers prioritize their review workload and help to
@ -97,60 +95,91 @@ considerable time in review, but they will be reviewed eventually. If
a change is urgent, you might consider contacting someone in
#openstack-infra on Freenode.
Teams
=====
Governance
==========
The infrastructure project is open, meaning anyone may join and begin
The OpenDev project is governed by two entities. The first is the
Service Coordinator. They coordinate work of contributors and act as
a tie breaker when clear consensus isn't found. The Service Coordinator is
responsible for managing spec reviews and core team membership (details
below). This role is essentially the same as the old Infra PTL role.
The Service Coordinator is elected every 6 months. The nominee pool and
electorate are individuals that have contributed changes to OpenDev git
repositories in the last 12 months.
The second is an advisory board made up of representatives from OpenDev's
user base of projects and organizations that contribute compute resources.
This advisory board provides a formal location for those key
stakeholders to express their needs to the OpenDev project.
This creates a clear contact point for feedback on priorities and direction.
Their input will help ensure that the OpenDev project is a good steward of
the resources provided to it and that user needs are being addressed.
Contributing orgs and user projects are not required to join the advisory
board, but are encouraged to do so. Individuals on the board would be
selected by their own constituency as that constituency feels is
appropriate.
The advisory board will also serve as a point of contact for the OpenDev
project when making changes that may be disruptive. The intent is to create
bidirectional communication between OpenDev and its constituent
organizations.
Teams
-----
The OpenDev project is open, meaning anyone may join and begin
contributing with no formal process. As an individual's contributions
and involvement grow, there are more formal roles. These roles are
designed to empower groups of people to get work done in their area of
expertise and interest, as well as supply a strong sense of direction
for the infrastructure project as a whole. Everyone participating in
for the OpenDev project as a whole. Everyone participating in
the project is encouraged to expand their own knowledge while helping
to support and mentor others as they progress.
Core Teams
The infrastructure project is composed of a large number of
The OpenDev project is composed of a large number of
subprojects. Every source code repository has its own core team
which is responsible for maintenance of that subproject, with some
groups of repositories sharing a core team. These core teams are
empowered to approve changes that reflect the currently understood
project direction. Changes in project direction or major new
initiatives must be approved by the infrastructure council.
initiatives must be approved by the OpenDev council.
Any existing core team member may nominate someone for addition to
that core team by private communication with the infrastructure PTL.
The PTL will consider the opinions of the existing core team members
and the review history of the person in question, but final
determination of core team membership (additions and removals) rests
with the PTL. This process is private to enable honest evaluations
in a safe environment.
that core team by private communication with the OpenDev Service
Coordinator. The Service Coordinator will consider the opinions of the
existing core team members and the review history of the person in
question, but final determination of core team membership (additions and
removals) rests with the Service Coordinator. This process is private to
enable honest evaluations in a safe environment.
Infrastructure Core Team
OpenDev Core Team
Individuals who show an interest in a wide range of areas of the
infrastructure project may be asked to join the infra-core team. To
OpenDev project may be asked to join the infra-core team. To
provide a baseline level of support to all of our subprojects and to
ensure that important efforts may move forward, this team has
approval rights in all infrastructure repositories. Members of this
approval rights in all OpenDev repositories. Members of this
team may not be experts in all areas, but know their limits, and
will not exceed those limits when reviewing changes outside of their
area of expertise.
They are expected to have a wide general knowledge of what is going
on in the infrastructure project and to help guide overall project
on in the OpenDev project and to help guide overall project
direction. To that end, they are able to veto specs proposed to the
infrastructure council.
OpenDev council.
Infrastructure Council
The infrastructure council is the technical design body for the
infrastructure project. While individuals and groups are empowered
OpenDev Council
The OpenDev council is the technical design body for the
Opendev project. While individuals and groups are empowered
to execute the designs from the council, major technical designs are
agreed upon as a group to ensure that our large set of projects are
all working together to the same end. The council need not delve
too deeply into technical detail -- just enough so that development
efforts may happen in parallel and work toward a common goal.
All members of any infrastructure project core team have a seat on
All members of any OpenDev project core team have a seat on
the Council. The Council is responsible for approving changes in
project direction, major new initiatives, setting priority efforts,
and addition or removal of projects.
@ -163,20 +192,20 @@ Infrastructure Council
ready. Members of the council will vote by leaving reviews on the
spec to approve or reject the change. The determination will be
based on a majority vote, with members of the infra-core team able
to veto, and in the case of a tie, the PTL will cast the deciding
vote. The PTL will execute the workflow action on the change after
the vote.
to veto, and in the case of a tie, the Service Coordinator will cast
the deciding vote. The Service Coordinator will execute the workflow
action on the change after the vote.
Specs are living documents, and once approved, should be maintained
for the duration of the effort they describe. Substantial changes
in direction should go through the same process described above.
The PTL may chose to approve insubstantial changes without the
formal council voting process.
The Service Coordinator may chose to approve insubstantial changes
without the formal council voting process.
Infrastructure Root Team
While core membership is analogous to the same system in other
OpenStack projects, because the infrastructure team operates
production servers there is another sub-group of the infrastructure
OpenDev Root Team
Core membership enables one to approve changes within our code
repositories. Because the OpenDev team operates
production servers there is another sub-group of the OpenDev
team that has root access to all servers. Root membership is
handled in the same way as core membership. Root members must also
be infra-core members, but infra-core members may not necessarily be
@ -184,15 +213,16 @@ Infrastructure Root Team
performed through code review, so anyone able to log into a machine
to execute commands must be able to approve those same commands in
configuration management; otherwise it would be easier for a person
to bypass puppet than use it in the intended fashion.
to bypass configuration management than use it in the intended
fashion.
Root access is generally only necessary to launch new servers,
perform low-level maintenance, manage DNS, or fix problems. In
general it is not needed for day-to-day system administration and
configuration which is done in puppet (where anyone may propose
changes). Therefore it is generally reserved for people who are
well versed in infrastructure operations and can commit to spending
a significant amount of time troubleshooting on servers.
configuration which is done through automated config management tools
(where anyone may propose changes). Therefore it is generally
reserved for people who are well versed in OpenDev operations and can
commit to spending a significant amount of time troubleshooting on servers.
Some individuals may need root access to individual servers; in
these cases the infra-core group may grant root access on a limited