Update logstash doc for an elasticsearch cluster
Change-Id: I57b84c87599f129d9c273e29ff6b1a48c56c115d
This commit is contained in:
parent
ccc39c3bb8
commit
ac13b41bed
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ At a Glance
|
||||
:Hosts:
|
||||
* http://logstash.openstack.org
|
||||
* logstash-worker\*.openstack.org
|
||||
* elasticsearch.openstack.org
|
||||
* elasticsearch\*.openstack.org
|
||||
:Puppet:
|
||||
* :file:`modules/logstash`
|
||||
* :file:`modules/openstack_project/manifests/logstash.pp`
|
||||
@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ bottleneck very quickly. This looks something like:
|
||||
\ | /
|
||||
\ | /
|
||||
elasticsearch
|
||||
cluster
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
kibana
|
||||
@ -170,17 +171,12 @@ ElasticSearch
|
||||
|
||||
ElasticSearch is basically a REST API layer for Lucene. It provides
|
||||
the storage and search engine for Logstash. It scales horizontally and
|
||||
loves it when you give it more memory. Currently we run a single node
|
||||
cluster on a large VM to give ElasticSearch both memory and disk space.
|
||||
Per index (Logstash creates one index per day) we have one replica (on
|
||||
the same node, this does not provide HA, it speeds up searches) and
|
||||
five shards (each shard is basically its own index, having multiple
|
||||
shards increases indexing throughput).
|
||||
|
||||
As this setup grows and handles more logs we may need to add more
|
||||
ElasticSearch nodes and run a proper cluster. Haven't reached that point
|
||||
yet, but will probably be necessary as disk and memory footprints
|
||||
increase.
|
||||
loves it when you give it more memory. Currently we run a multi-node
|
||||
cluster on large VMs to give ElasticSearch both memory and disk space.
|
||||
Per index (Logstash creates one index per day) we have N+1 replica
|
||||
redundancy to distribute disk utilization and provide high availability.
|
||||
Each replica is broken into multiple shards providing inceased indexing
|
||||
and search throughput as each shard is essentially a valid mini index.
|
||||
|
||||
Kibana
|
||||
------
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user