Merge "Reword open design overview section"
This commit is contained in:
commit
b5f5fe2524
@ -13,16 +13,22 @@ Open Design
|
||||
meet your needs.
|
||||
|
||||
The Four Opens are all about the acceptance of letting go of control over an
|
||||
open source project. One popular open source development model for an
|
||||
organization to release it has developed under an open source license. While
|
||||
most of them will also commit to a transparent and inclusive development
|
||||
process, they still frequently maintain control of the software with most of
|
||||
the design decisions being made by organization leaders and implemented by
|
||||
their employees. The principle of "Open design" takes this one step beyond and
|
||||
guarantees a transparent and open process for planning and designing the
|
||||
software. It's about letting go of the control of the design of the software
|
||||
and its feature road-map, and accepting that it should be driven by the
|
||||
community.
|
||||
open source project. A common open source development model for traditional
|
||||
software development organizations is to develop internally, then release
|
||||
their project under an open source license once it is mostly complete.
|
||||
While most of them will also commit to a transparent and inclusive
|
||||
development process, they still frequently maintain control of the software
|
||||
with most of the design decisions being made by organization leaders and
|
||||
implemented by their employees. This keeps control of the direction of the
|
||||
project with the organization, but can result in missing out on unexpected
|
||||
ideas from community members and may actually discourage others from getting
|
||||
involved in what they may perceive as a company product rather than an open and
|
||||
inclusive community project.
|
||||
|
||||
Using the principle of "Open Design" takes this one step beyond and guarantees
|
||||
a transparent and open process for planning and designing the software. It's
|
||||
about letting go of the control of the design of the software and its feature
|
||||
roadmap, and accepting that it should be driven by the community.
|
||||
|
||||
This is not easy to do. Design is an opinionated process. Design by committee
|
||||
can be inefficient. It's easier and faster to keep design and feature
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user