Update patch set 2

Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1

(1 comment)

Patch-set: 2
Reviewer: Gerrit User 32363 <32363@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543>
Label: Code-Review=+1, 1426074ef0077fe1cc0465f59f865c21b03359d9
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 35007 \u003c35007@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_32363\u003e replied on the change"}
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 32363 \u003c32363@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_32363\u003e replied on the change"}
This commit is contained in:
Gerrit User 32363 2023-11-29 21:43:48 +00:00 committed by Gerrit Code Review
parent 3092b9875e
commit 48ef412f87
1 changed files with 17 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -16,6 +16,23 @@
"message": "Hi Martin,\n\nIn our cloud, we\u0027ve configured our endpoints to have path based suffixes (e.g. `http://IP:PORT/\u003csome_path\u003e/v2`), and the discovery tool isn\u0027t working properly with this kind of endpoints because it cuts too much (`\u003csome_path\u003e/v2` this is example) when the port is **not** None. I tried to work around this by using `utils.get_base_url` instead of `no_port_cut_url` to properly remove the version in the service URL, this should also be backward-compatible. \n\nCan I ask you opinion regarding this approach / issue?\n\nThank you.",
"revId": "aa037e9ce093e87a7b22000c4013be247c645b71",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": false,
"key": {
"uuid": "4ef014d5_9412aa54",
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
"patchSetId": 2
},
"lineNbr": 0,
"author": {
"id": 32363
},
"writtenOn": "2023-11-29T21:43:48Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "These changes seem reasonable to me.",
"revId": "aa037e9ce093e87a7b22000c4013be247c645b71",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
}
]
}