refstack-client/specs
gecong1973 dab1b18435 Fix a typo in template.rst
defintion should be definition

Change-Id: I8e005d85b4a22db8c82a07c5f067685a9f59962b
2017-03-24 15:04:10 +08:00
..
newton/approved Implement additional properties Defcore waiver 2016-09-19 18:57:24 +00:00
README.rst Add specs hierarchy into refstack-client 2016-07-30 01:38:11 +00:00
template.rst Fix a typo in template.rst 2017-03-24 15:04:10 +08:00

Refstack-Client Specifications

This folder is used to hold design specifications for additions to the refstack-client project. Reviews of the specs are done in gerrit, using a similar workflow to how we review and merge changes to the code itself.

The layout of this folder is as follows:

specs/<release>/
specs/<release>/approved
specs/<release>/implemented

The lifecycle of a specification

Specifications are proposed by adding an .rst file to the specs/<release>/approved directory and posting it for review. You can find an example specification in /specs/template.rst.

Once a specification has been fully implemented, meaning a patch has landed, it will be moved to the implemented directory and the corresponding blueprint will be marked as complete.

Specifications are only approved for a single release. If a specification was previously approved but not implemented (or not completely implemented), then the specification needs to be re-proposed by copying (not move) it to the right directory for the current release.

Previously approved specifications

The refstack-client specs directory was created during the Newton cycle. Therefore, the specs approved and implemented prior to the Newton cycle will be saved in the RefStack project.

Others

Please note, Launchpad blueprints are still used for tracking the status of the blueprints. For more information, see:

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/refstack

For more information about working with gerrit, see:

http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#development-workflow

To validate that the specification is syntactically correct (i.e. get more confidence in the Jenkins result), please execute the following command:

$ tox -e docs