Reword the note following microversion headers

I had to read the original note four times before it made sense to me.
The problem, I think, was that it talked about 'old' and 'new' - but I
don't have enough context to immediately remember which is old and which
is new. Also, the new thing was first, and my brain wanted to make them
be listed in the opposite order. It was also unclear to me for a bit
which was the one I was supposed to use.

Address those concerns by rewording the note to be clear that the first
option is the desired one, and to refer to each of them as first and
second rather than old and new.

Change-Id: I1d51572eb57278e6b21224ca60516c528de42ee1
This commit is contained in:
Monty Taylor 2016-05-05 08:54:22 -05:00 committed by Chris Dent
parent 3697b7fde7
commit f75a52f7b7

@ -66,10 +66,11 @@ following two headers::
OpenStack-API-Version: compute 2.1
OpenStack-Nova-API-Version: 2.1
.. note:: The second header is in the form of a microversion header
currently in use. It effectively demonstrates the problem. Also
note that whereas the older header uses a service name the newer
header uses the more correct service type.
.. note:: The first header is the recommended form. The second header
is in the form of a microversion header currently in use. It
effectively demonstrates the problem. Also note that whereas the
second header uses a service name, the first header uses the more
correct service type.
At first glance these header name and value pairs convey the same
information, with the second option being a bit easier to parse on