Update patch set 1
Patch Set 1: (4 comments) Good sensible start, some clarity suggestions within. Patch-set: 1 Label: Verified=0
This commit is contained in:
parent
c0bbe1c0da
commit
8ad3eb53b2
72
bf3ff38c4f363fd907d8897ad8b0067c16851120
Normal file
72
bf3ff38c4f363fd907d8897ad8b0067c16851120
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"comments": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a71b18c_a462bcab",
|
||||
"filename": "proposals/base-services.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 54,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 11564
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2016-12-08T11:34:22Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "This could be read and inter project communication being via message queues (which is sometimes true) and not include components within projects (e.g, api\u003c-\u003econductor\u003c-\u003ecompute in nova).\n\nAlso it is a bit prescriptive; there is also communication that happens via other methods, including HTTP.\n\nSo it might make more sense to be a bit more explicit:\n\nSome inter-process and inter-service communication in OpenStack components is accomplished using message queues.",
|
||||
"revId": "bf3ff38c4f363fd907d8897ad8b0067c16851120",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a71b18c_c41fb859",
|
||||
"filename": "proposals/base-services.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 55,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 11564
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2016-12-08T11:34:22Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "through?",
|
||||
"revId": "bf3ff38c4f363fd907d8897ad8b0067c16851120",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a71b18c_0420d048",
|
||||
"filename": "proposals/base-services.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 61,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 11564
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2016-12-08T11:34:22Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "This second sentence is overly complex. maybe:\n\nDeployments can assume that Keystone will be present to perform that role.",
|
||||
"revId": "bf3ff38c4f363fd907d8897ad8b0067c16851120",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a71b18c_c4aa5885",
|
||||
"filename": "proposals/base-services.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 83,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 11564
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2016-12-08T11:34:22Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "s/allows to give/gives/",
|
||||
"revId": "bf3ff38c4f363fd907d8897ad8b0067c16851120",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user