Update patch set 2
Patch Set 2: Code-Review-1 (1 comment) Patch-set: 2 Reviewer: Gerrit User 20870 <20870@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543> Label: Code-Review=-1 Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 20870 \u003c20870@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_20870\u003e replied on the change"}
This commit is contained in:
parent
4e2101e8d0
commit
f191fb30e4
|
@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"comments": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "2cd58e93_77cf6b30",
|
||||
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 0,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 20870
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2022-07-25T07:50:27Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "As per my review on charm-pacemaker-remote, I\u0027m just wondering about whether we should advertise kinetic support in the charmcraft.yaml and metadata.yam files.",
|
||||
"revId": "d8dcb8a2841133dfa85227118a03a7ffeb765b14",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue