Update patch set 2
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+2 Workflow+1 (1 comment) Patch-set: 2 Reviewer: Gerrit User 20870 <20870@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543> Label: Code-Review=+2, 2bccbfb91727a4d30f77226f22c50c37b54bf323 Label: Workflow=+1, df6b18ccc101b4d25bd414335f10165c58b9bf00
This commit is contained in:
parent
d39c4d7c2d
commit
3b6b110894
|
@ -33,6 +33,23 @@
|
|||
"message": "charm-recheck\n\n\u003e 2023-05-14 18:53:01.156661 | focal-medium | 2023-05-14 18:53:01 [INFO] File \"/home/ubuntu/src/review.opendev.org/openstack/charm-rabbitmq-server/.tox/func-target/lib/python3.8/site-packages/zaza/openstack/charm_tests/rabbitmq_server/utils.py\", line 262, in validate_ssl_enabled_units\n2023-05-14 18:53:01.156679 | focal-medium | 2023-05-14 18:53:01 [INFO] \u0027({})\u0027.format(u.info[\u0027unit_name\u0027]))\n2023-05-14 18:53:01.156692 | focal-medium | 2023-05-14 18:53:01 [INFO] File \"/home/ubuntu/src/review.opendev.org/openstack/charm-rabbitmq-server/.tox/func-target/lib/python3.8/site-packages/juju/model.py\", line 278, in __getattr__\n2023-05-14 18:53:01.156705 | focal-medium | 2023-05-14 18:53:01 [INFO] return self.safe_data[name]\n\nLooks like an issue in juju as units came from zaza.model.get_units(...)\n\nTry again, and see if it is a repeatable issue, or if we need to raise a bug/handle it in some way.",
|
||||
"revId": "58c2a1aa9304fafcd5bea5b271750a76e308e5db",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "f759341c_47272a1a",
|
||||
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 0,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 20870
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2023-05-16T19:35:51Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "LGTM",
|
||||
"revId": "58c2a1aa9304fafcd5bea5b271750a76e308e5db",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue