![]() Patch Set 5: (7 comments) Hi Robert; I really struggled with this review and I think it's because it's retaining 'old' function names but doing something very different. I've had a go at re-writing the algorithm to a generic, recursive flatten to try to make things simpler, but this may not be what you were looking for? Patch-set: 5 Reviewer: Gerrit User 20870 <20870@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543> |
||
---|---|---|
9b34af1aea048f72cb1bd840aec19a5068a83009 | ||
16fa10433ca040b01f6216b9ef95ec97de54eb0e | ||
10663e5bd39e971810806d173d0ab959619cb19a |