openstack/deb-manila
Code Issues Proposed changes

Use oslo_policy lib instead of oslo-incubator code

Browse Source 
Code from manila/openstack/common/policy.py duplicates code
from oslo_policy, so we remove this module and use oslo_policy instead.

Implements bp use-oslo-policy-lib

Change-Id: I289221a1e96f6c705deef4070be113d69c57f6e0
This commit is contained in:
Julia Varlamova 2015-04-21 11:42:21 +03:00
parent c8a06f808d
commit a4a60b1328
9 changed files with 29 additions and 947 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
manila/cmd/manage.py
View File

@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ def main():
sys.exit(2)
try:
log.register_options(CONF)
CONF(sys.argv[1:], project='manila',
version=version.version_string())
log.setup(CONF, "manila")

924
manila/openstack/common/policy.py
View File

@ -1,924 +0,0 @@
# Copyright (c) 2012 OpenStack Foundation.
# All Rights Reserved.
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may
# not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain
# a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT
# WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the
# License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under the License.
"""
Common Policy Engine Implementation
Policies can be expressed in one of two forms: A list of lists, or a
string written in the new policy language.
In the list-of-lists representation, each check inside the innermost
list is combined as with an "and" conjunction--for that check to pass,
all the specified checks must pass. These innermost lists are then
combined as with an "or" conjunction. This is the original way of
expressing policies, but there now exists a new way: the policy
language.
In the policy language, each check is specified the same way as in the
list-of-lists representation: a simple "a:b" pair that is matched to
the correct code to perform that check. However, conjunction
operators are available, allowing for more expressiveness in crafting
policies.
As an example, take the following rule, expressed in the list-of-lists
representation::
[["role:admin"], ["project_id:%(project_id)s", "role:projectadmin"]]
In the policy language, this becomes::
role:admin or (project_id:%(project_id)s and role:projectadmin)
The policy language also has the "not" operator, allowing a richer
policy rule::
project_id:%(project_id)s and not role:dunce
It is possible to perform policy checks on the following user
attributes (obtained through the token): user_id, domain_id or
project_id::
domain_id:<some_value>
Attributes sent along with API calls can be used by the policy engine
(on the right side of the expression), by using the following syntax::
<some_value>:user.id
Contextual attributes of objects identified by their IDs are loaded
from the database. They are also available to the policy engine and
can be checked through the `target` keyword::
<some_value>:target.role.name
All these attributes (related to users, API calls, and context) can be
checked against each other or against constants, be it literals (True,
<a_number>) or strings.
Finally, two special policy checks should be mentioned; the policy
check "@" will always accept an access, and the policy check "!" will
always reject an access. (Note that if a rule is either the empty
list ("[]") or the empty string, this is equivalent to the "@" policy
check.) Of these, the "!" policy check is probably the most useful,
as it allows particular rules to be explicitly disabled.
"""
import abc
import ast
import os
import re
from oslo.config import cfg
from oslo.serialization import jsonutils
import six
import six.moves.urllib.parse as urlparse
import six.moves.urllib.request as urlrequest
from manila.openstack.common import fileutils
from manila.openstack.common._i18n import _, _LE, _LW
from manila.openstack.common import log as logging
policy_opts = [
cfg.StrOpt('policy_file',
default='policy.json',
help=_('The JSON file that defines policies.')),
cfg.StrOpt('policy_default_rule',
default='default',
help=_('Default rule. Enforced when a requested rule is not '
'found.')),
cfg.MultiStrOpt('policy_dirs',
default=['policy.d'],
help=_('Directories where policy configuration files are '
'stored')),
]
CONF = cfg.CONF
CONF.register_opts(policy_opts)
LOG = logging.getLogger(__name__)
_checks = {}
class PolicyNotAuthorized(Exception):
def __init__(self, rule):
msg = _("Policy doesn't allow %s to be performed.") % rule
super(PolicyNotAuthorized, self).__init__(msg)
class Rules(dict):
"""A store for rules. Handles the default_rule setting directly."""
@classmethod
def load_json(cls, data, default_rule=None):
"""Allow loading of JSON rule data."""
# Suck in the JSON data and parse the rules
rules = dict((k, parse_rule(v)) for k, v in
jsonutils.loads(data).items())
return cls(rules, default_rule)
def __init__(self, rules=None, default_rule=None):
"""Initialize the Rules store."""
super(Rules, self).__init__(rules or {})
self.default_rule = default_rule
def __missing__(self, key):
"""Implements the default rule handling."""
if isinstance(self.default_rule, dict):
raise KeyError(key)
# If the default rule isn't actually defined, do something
# reasonably intelligent
if not self.default_rule:
raise KeyError(key)
if isinstance(self.default_rule, BaseCheck):
return self.default_rule
# We need to check this or we can get infinite recursion
if self.default_rule not in self:
raise KeyError(key)
elif isinstance(self.default_rule, six.string_types):
return self[self.default_rule]
def __str__(self):
"""Dumps a string representation of the rules."""
# Start by building the canonical strings for the rules
out_rules = {}
for key, value in self.items():
# Use empty string for singleton TrueCheck instances
if isinstance(value, TrueCheck):
out_rules[key] = ''
else:
out_rules[key] = str(value)
# Dump a pretty-printed JSON representation
return jsonutils.dumps(out_rules, indent=4)
class Enforcer(object):
"""Responsible for loading and enforcing rules.
:param policy_file: Custom policy file to use, if none is
specified, `CONF.policy_file` will be
used.
:param rules: Default dictionary / Rules to use. It will be
considered just in the first instantiation. If
`load_rules(True)`, `clear()` or `set_rules(True)`
is called this will be overwritten.
:param default_rule: Default rule to use, CONF.default_rule will
be used if none is specified.
:param use_conf: Whether to load rules from cache or config file.
"""
def __init__(self, policy_file=None, rules=None,
default_rule=None, use_conf=True):
self.default_rule = default_rule or CONF.policy_default_rule
self.rules = Rules(rules, self.default_rule)
self.policy_path = None
self.policy_file = policy_file or CONF.policy_file
self.use_conf = use_conf
def set_rules(self, rules, overwrite=True, use_conf=False):
"""Create a new Rules object based on the provided dict of rules.
:param rules: New rules to use. It should be an instance of dict.
:param overwrite: Whether to overwrite current rules or update them
with the new rules.
:param use_conf: Whether to reload rules from cache or config file.
"""
if not isinstance(rules, dict):
raise TypeError(_("Rules must be an instance of dict or Rules, "
"got %s instead") % type(rules))
self.use_conf = use_conf
if overwrite:
self.rules = Rules(rules, self.default_rule)
else:
self.rules.update(rules)
def clear(self):
"""Clears Enforcer rules, policy's cache and policy's path."""
self.set_rules({})
fileutils.delete_cached_file(self.policy_path)
self.default_rule = None
self.policy_path = None
def load_rules(self, force_reload=False):
"""Loads policy_path's rules.
Policy file is cached and will be reloaded if modified.
:param force_reload: Whether to overwrite current rules.
"""
if force_reload:
self.use_conf = force_reload
if self.use_conf:
if not self.policy_path:
self.policy_path = self._get_policy_path(self.policy_file)
self._load_policy_file(self.policy_path, force_reload)
for path in CONF.policy_dirs:
try:
path = self._get_policy_path(path)
except cfg.ConfigFilesNotFoundError:
LOG.warn(_LW("Can not find policy directories %s"), path)
continue
self._walk_through_policy_directory(path,
self._load_policy_file,
force_reload, False)
def _walk_through_policy_directory(self, path, func, *args):
# We do not iterate over sub-directories.
policy_files = next(os.walk(path))[2]
policy_files.sort()
for policy_file in [p for p in policy_files if not p.startswith('.')]:
func(os.path.join(path, policy_file), *args)
def _load_policy_file(self, path, force_reload, overwrite=True):
reloaded, data = fileutils.read_cached_file(
path, force_reload=force_reload)
if reloaded or not self.rules:
rules = Rules.load_json(data, self.default_rule)
self.set_rules(rules, overwrite)
LOG.debug("Rules successfully reloaded")
def _get_policy_path(self, path):
"""Locate the policy json data file/path.
:param path: It's value can be a full path or related path. When
full path specified, this function just returns the full
path. When related path specified, this function will
search configuration directories to find one that exists.
:returns: The policy path
:raises: ConfigFilesNotFoundError if the file/path couldn't
be located.
"""
policy_path = CONF.find_file(path)
if policy_path:
return policy_path
raise cfg.ConfigFilesNotFoundError((path,))
def enforce(self, rule, target, creds, do_raise=False,
exc=None, *args, **kwargs):
"""Checks authorization of a rule against the target and credentials.
:param rule: A string or BaseCheck instance specifying the rule
to evaluate.
:param target: As much information about the object being operated
on as possible, as a dictionary.
:param creds: As much information about the user performing the
action as possible, as a dictionary.
:param do_raise: Whether to raise an exception or not if check
fails.
:param exc: Class of the exception to raise if the check fails.
Any remaining arguments passed to enforce() (both
positional and keyword arguments) will be passed to
the exception class. If not specified, PolicyNotAuthorized
will be used.
:return: Returns False if the policy does not allow the action and
exc is not provided; otherwise, returns a value that
evaluates to True. Note: for rules using the "case"
expression, this True value will be the specified string
from the expression.
"""
self.load_rules()
# Allow the rule to be a Check tree
if isinstance(rule, BaseCheck):
result = rule(target, creds, self)
elif not self.rules:
# No rules to reference means we're going to fail closed
result = False
else:
try:
# Evaluate the rule
result = self.rules[rule](target, creds, self)
except KeyError:
LOG.debug("Rule [%s] doesn't exist" % rule)
# If the rule doesn't exist, fail closed
result = False
# If it is False, raise the exception if requested
if do_raise and not result:
if exc:
raise exc(*args, **kwargs)
raise PolicyNotAuthorized(rule)
return result
@six.add_metaclass(abc.ABCMeta)
class BaseCheck(object):
"""Abstract base class for Check classes."""
@abc.abstractmethod
def __str__(self):
"""String representation of the Check tree rooted at this node."""
pass
@abc.abstractmethod
def __call__(self, target, cred, enforcer):
"""Triggers if instance of the class is called.
Performs the check. Returns False to reject the access or a
true value (not necessary True) to accept the access.
"""
pass
class FalseCheck(BaseCheck):
"""A policy check that always returns False (disallow)."""
def __str__(self):
"""Return a string representation of this check."""
return "!"
def __call__(self, target, cred, enforcer):
"""Check the policy."""
return False
class TrueCheck(BaseCheck):
"""A policy check that always returns True (allow)."""
def __str__(self):
"""Return a string representation of this check."""
return "@"
def __call__(self, target, cred, enforcer):
"""Check the policy."""
return True
class Check(BaseCheck):
"""A base class to allow for user-defined policy checks."""
def __init__(self, kind, match):
"""Initiates Check instance.
:param kind: The kind of the check, i.e., the field before the
':'.
:param match: The match of the check, i.e., the field after
the ':'.
"""
self.kind = kind
self.match = match
def __str__(self):
"""Return a string representation of this check."""
return "%s:%s" % (self.kind, self.match)
class NotCheck(BaseCheck):
"""Implements the "not" logical operator.
A policy check that inverts the result of another policy check.
"""
def __init__(self, rule):
"""Initialize the 'not' check.
:param rule: The rule to negate. Must be a Check.
"""
self.rule = rule
def __str__(self):
"""Return a string representation of this check."""
return "not %s" % self.rule
def __call__(self, target, cred, enforcer):
"""Check the policy.
Returns the logical inverse of the wrapped check.
"""
return not self.rule(target, cred, enforcer)
class AndCheck(BaseCheck):
"""Implements the "and" logical operator.
A policy check that requires that a list of other checks all return True.
"""
def __init__(self, rules):
"""Initialize the 'and' check.
:param rules: A list of rules that will be tested.
"""
self.rules = rules
def __str__(self):
"""Return a string representation of this check."""
return "(%s)" % ' and '.join(str(r) for r in self.rules)
def __call__(self, target, cred, enforcer):
"""Check the policy.
Requires that all rules accept in order to return True.
"""
for rule in self.rules:
if not rule(target, cred, enforcer):
return False
return True
def add_check(self, rule):
"""Adds rule to be tested.
Allows addition of another rule to the list of rules that will
be tested. Returns the AndCheck object for convenience.
"""
self.rules.append(rule)
return self
class OrCheck(BaseCheck):
"""Implements the "or" operator.
A policy check that requires that at least one of a list of other
checks returns True.
"""
def __init__(self, rules):
"""Initialize the 'or' check.
:param rules: A list of rules that will be tested.
"""
self.rules = rules
def __str__(self):
"""Return a string representation of this check."""
return "(%s)" % ' or '.join(str(r) for r in self.rules)
def __call__(self, target, cred, enforcer):
"""Check the policy.
Requires that at least one rule accept in order to return True.
"""
for rule in self.rules:
if rule(target, cred, enforcer):
return True
return False
def add_check(self, rule):
"""Adds rule to be tested.
Allows addition of another rule to the list of rules that will
be tested. Returns the OrCheck object for convenience.
"""
self.rules.append(rule)
return self
def _parse_check(rule):
"""Parse a single base check rule into an appropriate Check object."""
# Handle the special checks
if rule == '!':
return FalseCheck()
elif rule == '@':
return TrueCheck()
try:
kind, match = rule.split(':', 1)
except Exception:
LOG.exception(_LE("Failed to understand rule %s") % rule)
# If the rule is invalid, we'll fail closed
return FalseCheck()
# Find what implements the check
if kind in _checks:
return _checks[kind](kind, match)
elif None in _checks:
return _checks[None](kind, match)
else:
LOG.error(_LE("No handler for matches of kind %s") % kind)
return FalseCheck()
def _parse_list_rule(rule):
"""Translates the old list-of-lists syntax into a tree of Check objects.
Provided for backwards compatibility.
"""
# Empty rule defaults to True
if not rule:
return TrueCheck()
# Outer list is joined by "or"; inner list by "and"
or_list = []
for inner_rule in rule:
# Elide empty inner lists
if not inner_rule:
continue
# Handle bare strings
if isinstance(inner_rule, six.string_types):
inner_rule = [inner_rule]
# Parse the inner rules into Check objects
and_list = [_parse_check(r) for r in inner_rule]
# Append the appropriate check to the or_list
if len(and_list) == 1:
or_list.append(and_list[0])
else:
or_list.append(AndCheck(and_list))
# If we have only one check, omit the "or"
if not or_list:
return FalseCheck()
elif len(or_list) == 1:
return or_list[0]
return OrCheck(or_list)
# Used for tokenizing the policy language
_tokenize_re = re.compile(r'\s+')
def _parse_tokenize(rule):
"""Tokenizer for the policy language.
Most of the single-character tokens are specified in the
_tokenize_re; however, parentheses need to be handled specially,
because they can appear inside a check string. Thankfully, those
parentheses that appear inside a check string can never occur at
the very beginning or end ("%(variable)s" is the correct syntax).
"""
for tok in _tokenize_re.split(rule):
# Skip empty tokens
if not tok or tok.isspace():
continue
# Handle leading parens on the token
clean = tok.lstrip('(')
for i in range(len(tok) - len(clean)):
yield '(', '('
# If it was only parentheses, continue
if not clean:
continue
else:
tok = clean
# Handle trailing parens on the token
clean = tok.rstrip(')')
trail = len(tok) - len(clean)
# Yield the cleaned token
lowered = clean.lower()
if lowered in ('and', 'or', 'not'):
# Special tokens
yield lowered, clean
elif clean:
# Not a special token, but not composed solely of ')'
if len(tok) >= 2 and ((tok[0], tok[-1]) in
[('"', '"'), ("'", "'")]):
# It's a quoted string
yield 'string', tok[1:-1]
else:
yield 'check', _parse_check(clean)
# Yield the trailing parens
for i in range(trail):
yield ')', ')'
class ParseStateMeta(type):
"""Metaclass for the ParseState class.
Facilitates identifying reduction methods.
"""
def __new__(mcs, name, bases, cls_dict):
"""Create the class.
Injects the 'reducers' list, a list of tuples matching token sequences
to the names of the corresponding reduction methods.
"""
reducers = []
for key, value in cls_dict.items():
if not hasattr(value, 'reducers'):
continue
for reduction in value.reducers:
reducers.append((reduction, key))
cls_dict['reducers'] = reducers
return super(ParseStateMeta, mcs).__new__(mcs, name, bases, cls_dict)
def reducer(*tokens):
"""Decorator for reduction methods.
Arguments are a sequence of tokens, in order, which should trigger running
this reduction method.
"""
def decorator(func):
# Make sure we have a list of reducer sequences
if not hasattr(func, 'reducers'):
func.reducers = []
# Add the tokens to the list of reducer sequences
func.reducers.append(list(tokens))
return func
return decorator
@six.add_metaclass(ParseStateMeta)
class ParseState(object):
"""Implement the core of parsing the policy language.
Uses a greedy reduction algorithm to reduce a sequence of tokens into
a single terminal, the value of which will be the root of the Check tree.
Note: error reporting is rather lacking. The best we can get with
this parser formulation is an overall "parse failed" error.
Fortunately, the policy language is simple enough that this
shouldn't be that big a problem.
"""
def __init__(self):
"""Initialize the ParseState."""
self.tokens = []
self.values = []
def reduce(self):
"""Perform a greedy reduction of the token stream.
If a reducer method matches, it will be executed, then the
reduce() method will be called recursively to search for any more
possible reductions.
"""
for reduction, methname in self.reducers:
if (len(self.tokens) >= len(reduction) and
self.tokens[-len(reduction):] == reduction):
# Get the reduction method
meth = getattr(self, methname)
# Reduce the token stream
results = meth(*self.values[-len(reduction):])
# Update the tokens and values
self.tokens[-len(reduction):] = [r[0] for r in results]
self.values[-len(reduction):] = [r[1] for r in results]
# Check for any more reductions
return self.reduce()
def shift(self, tok, value):
"""Adds one more token to the state. Calls reduce()."""
self.tokens.append(tok)
self.values.append(value)
# Do a greedy reduce...
self.reduce()
@property
def result(self):
"""Obtain the final result of the parse.
Raises ValueError if the parse failed to reduce to a single result.
"""
if len(self.values) != 1:
raise ValueError("Could not parse rule")
return self.values[0]
@reducer('(', 'check', ')')
@reducer('(', 'and_expr', ')')
@reducer('(', 'or_expr', ')')
def _wrap_check(self, _p1, check, _p2):
"""Turn parenthesized expressions into a 'check' token."""
return [('check', check)]
@reducer('check', 'and', 'check')
def _make_and_expr(self, check1, _and, check2):
"""Create an 'and_expr'.
Join two checks by the 'and' operator.
"""
return [('and_expr', AndCheck([check1, check2]))]
@reducer('and_expr', 'and', 'check')
def _extend_and_expr(self, and_expr, _and, check):
"""Extend an 'and_expr' by adding one more check."""
return [('and_expr', and_expr.add_check(check))]
@reducer('check', 'or', 'check')
def _make_or_expr(self, check1, _or, check2):
"""Create an 'or_expr'.
Join two checks by the 'or' operator.
"""
return [('or_expr', OrCheck([check1, check2]))]
@reducer('or_expr', 'or', 'check')
def _extend_or_expr(self, or_expr, _or, check):
"""Extend an 'or_expr' by adding one more check."""
return [('or_expr', or_expr.add_check(check))]
@reducer('not', 'check')
def _make_not_expr(self, _not, check):
"""Invert the result of another check."""
return [('check', NotCheck(check))]
def _parse_text_rule(rule):
"""Parses policy to the tree.
Translates a policy written in the policy language into a tree of
Check objects.
"""
# Empty rule means always accept
if not rule:
return TrueCheck()
# Parse the token stream
state = ParseState()
for tok, value in _parse_tokenize(rule):
state.shift(tok, value)
try:
return state.result
except ValueError:
# Couldn't parse the rule
LOG.exception(_LE("Failed to understand rule %s") % rule)
# Fail closed
return FalseCheck()
def parse_rule(rule):
"""Parses a policy rule into a tree of Check objects."""
# If the rule is a string, it's in the policy language
if isinstance(rule, six.string_types):
return _parse_text_rule(rule)
return _parse_list_rule(rule)
def register(name, func=None):
"""Register a function or Check class as a policy check.
:param name: Gives the name of the check type, e.g., 'rule',
'role', etc. If name is None, a default check type
will be registered.
:param func: If given, provides the function or class to register.
If not given, returns a function taking one argument
to specify the function or class to register,
allowing use as a decorator.
"""
# Perform the actual decoration by registering the function or
# class. Returns the function or class for compliance with the
# decorator interface.
def decorator(func):
_checks[name] = func
return func
# If the function or class is given, do the registration
if func:
return decorator(func)
return decorator
@register("rule")
class RuleCheck(Check):
def __call__(self, target, creds, enforcer):
"""Recursively checks credentials based on the defined rules."""
try:
return enforcer.rules[self.match](target, creds, enforcer)
except KeyError:
# We don't have any matching rule; fail closed
return False
@register("role")
class RoleCheck(Check):
def __call__(self, target, creds, enforcer):
"""Check that there is a matching role in the cred dict."""
return self.match.lower() in [x.lower() for x in creds['roles']]
@register('http')
class HttpCheck(Check):
def __call__(self, target, creds, enforcer):
"""Check http: rules by calling to a remote server.
This example implementation simply verifies that the response
is exactly 'True'.
"""
url = ('http:' + self.match) % target
data = {'target': jsonutils.dumps(target),
'credentials': jsonutils.dumps(creds)}
post_data = urlparse.urlencode(data)
f = urlrequest.urlopen(url, post_data)
return f.read() == "True"
@register(None)
class GenericCheck(Check):
def __call__(self, target, creds, enforcer):
"""Check an individual match.
Matches look like:
tenant:%(tenant_id)s
role:compute:admin
True:%(user.enabled)s
'Member':%(role.name)s
"""
try:
match = self.match % target
except KeyError:
# While doing GenericCheck if key not
# present in Target return false
return False
try:
# Try to interpret self.kind as a literal
leftval = ast.literal_eval(self.kind)
except ValueError:
try:
kind_parts = self.kind.split('.')
leftval = creds
for kind_part in kind_parts:
leftval = leftval[kind_part]
except KeyError:
return False
return match == six.text_type(leftval)

4
manila/opts.py
View File

@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import itertools
import oslo_concurrency.opts
import oslo_log._options
import oslo_policy.opts
import manila.api.common
import manila.api.middleware.auth
@ -39,7 +40,6 @@ import manila.network.nova_network_plugin
import manila.network.standalone_network_plugin
import manila.openstack.common.eventlet_backdoor
import manila.openstack.common.log
import manila.openstack.common.policy
import manila.quota
import manila.scheduler.driver
import manila.scheduler.host_manager
@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ _global_opt_lists = [
manila.openstack.common.log.generic_log_opts,
manila.openstack.common.log.log_opts,
manila.openstack.common.log.logging_cli_opts,
manila.openstack.common.policy.policy_opts,
manila.quota.quota_opts,
manila.scheduler.driver.scheduler_driver_opts,
manila.scheduler.host_manager.host_manager_opts,
@ -147,6 +146,7 @@ _opts = [
_opts.extend(oslo_concurrency.opts.list_opts())
_opts.extend(oslo_log._options.list_opts())
_opts.extend(oslo_policy.opts.list_opts())
def list_opts():

9
manila/policy.py
View File

@ -17,9 +17,12 @@
import functools
from manila import exception
from manila.openstack.common import policy
from oslo_config import cfg
from oslo_policy import policy
from manila import exception
CONF = cfg.CONF
_ENFORCER = None
@ -33,7 +36,7 @@ def reset():
def init(policy_path=None):
global _ENFORCER
if not _ENFORCER:
_ENFORCER = policy.Enforcer()
_ENFORCER = policy.Enforcer(CONF)
if policy_path:
_ENFORCER.policy_path = policy_path
_ENFORCER.load_rules()

10
manila/tests/cmd/test_manage.py
View File

@ -335,10 +335,11 @@ class ManilaCmdManageTestCase(test.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(exit.code, 2)
@mock.patch('oslo_config.cfg.ConfigOpts.__call__')
@mock.patch('manila.openstack.common.log.setup')
@mock.patch('oslo_log.log.register_options')
@mock.patch('oslo_log.log.setup')
@mock.patch('oslo_config.cfg.ConfigOpts.register_cli_opt')
def test_main_sudo_failed(self, register_cli_opt, log_setup,
config_opts_call):
register_log_opts, config_opts_call):
script_name = 'manila-manage'
sys.argv = [script_name, 'fake_category', 'fake_action']
config_opts_call.side_effect = cfg.ConfigFilesNotFoundError(
@ -347,6 +348,7 @@ class ManilaCmdManageTestCase(test.TestCase):
exit = self.assertRaises(SystemExit, manila_manage.main)
self.assertTrue(register_cli_opt.called)
register_log_opts.assert_called_once_with(CONF)
config_opts_call.assert_called_once_with(
sys.argv[1:], project='manila',
version=version.version_string())
@ -355,7 +357,8 @@ class ManilaCmdManageTestCase(test.TestCase):
@mock.patch('oslo_config.cfg.ConfigOpts.__call__')
@mock.patch('oslo_config.cfg.ConfigOpts.register_cli_opt')
def test_main(self, register_cli_opt, config_opts_call):
@mock.patch('oslo_log.log.register_options')
def test_main(self, register_log_opts, register_cli_opt, config_opts_call):
script_name = 'manila-manage'
sys.argv = [script_name, 'config', 'list']
action_fn = mock.MagicMock()
@ -364,6 +367,7 @@ class ManilaCmdManageTestCase(test.TestCase):
manila_manage.main()
self.assertTrue(register_cli_opt.called)
register_log_opts.assert_called_once_with(CONF)
config_opts_call.assert_called_once_with(
sys.argv[1:], project='manila', version=version.version_string())
self.assertTrue(action_fn.called)

4
manila/tests/conf_fixture.py
View File

@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
import os
from oslo_policy import opts
from manila.common import config
CONF = config.CONF
@ -31,7 +33,7 @@ def set_defaults(conf):
_safe_set_of_opts(conf, 'sqlite_synchronous', False)
_POLICY_PATH = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(CONF.state_path,
'manila/tests/policy.json'))
_safe_set_of_opts(conf, 'policy_file', _POLICY_PATH)
opts.set_defaults(conf, policy_file=_POLICY_PATH)
_safe_set_of_opts(conf, 'service_instance_user', 'fake_user')
_API_PASTE_PATH = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(CONF.state_path,
'etc/manila/api-paste.ini'))

22
manila/tests/test_policy.py
View File

@ -19,12 +19,12 @@ import os.path
import mock
from oslo_config import cfg
from oslo_policy import policy as common_policy
import six
from six.moves.urllib import request as urlrequest
from manila import context
from manila import exception
from manila.openstack.common import policy as common_policy
from manila import policy
from manila import test
from manila import utils
@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ class PolicyFileTestCase(test.TestCase):
def test_modified_policy_reloads(self):
with utils.tempdir() as tmpdir:
tmpfilename = os.path.join(tmpdir, 'policy')
self.flags(policy_file=tmpfilename)
CONF.set_override('policy_file', tmpfilename, group='oslo_policy')
action = "example:test"
with open(tmpfilename, "w") as policyfile:
policyfile.write("""{"example:test": []}""")
@ -90,9 +90,7 @@ class PolicyTestCase(test.TestCase):
super(PolicyTestCase, self).tearDown()
def _set_rules(self):
these_rules = common_policy.Rules(
dict((k, common_policy.parse_rule(v))
for k, v in self.rules.items()))
these_rules = common_policy.Rules.from_dict(self.rules)
policy._ENFORCER.set_rules(these_rules)
def test_enforce_nonexistent_action_throws(self):
@ -179,9 +177,8 @@ class DefaultPolicyTestCase(test.TestCase):
policy.reset()
def _set_rules(self, default_rule):
these_rules = common_policy.Rules(
dict((k, common_policy.parse_rule(v))
for k, v in self.rules.items()), default_rule)
these_rules = common_policy.Rules.from_dict(self.rules,
default_rule=default_rule)
policy._ENFORCER.set_rules(these_rules)
def test_policy_called(self):
@ -211,9 +208,8 @@ class ContextIsAdminPolicyTestCase(test.TestCase):
policy.init()
def _set_rules(self, rules, default_rule):
these_rules = common_policy.Rules(
dict((k, common_policy.parse_rule(v))
for k, v in rules.items()), default_rule)
these_rules = common_policy.Rules.from_dict(rules,
default_rule=default_rule)
policy._ENFORCER.set_rules(these_rules)
def test_default_admin_role_is_admin(self):
@ -227,7 +223,7 @@ class ContextIsAdminPolicyTestCase(test.TestCase):
rules = {
'context_is_admin': [["role:administrator"], ["role:johnny-admin"]]
}
self._set_rules(rules, CONF.policy_default_rule)
self._set_rules(rules, CONF.oslo_policy.policy_default_rule)
ctx = context.RequestContext('fake', 'fake', roles=['johnny-admin'])
self.assertTrue(ctx.is_admin)
ctx = context.RequestContext('fake', 'fake', roles=['administrator'])
@ -241,7 +237,7 @@ class ContextIsAdminPolicyTestCase(test.TestCase):
"admin_or_owner": "role:admin or project_id:%(project_id)s",
"default": "rule:admin_or_owner",
}
self._set_rules(rules, CONF.policy_default_rule)
self._set_rules(rules, CONF.oslo_policy.policy_default_rule)
ctx = context.RequestContext('fake', 'fake')
self.assertFalse(ctx.is_admin)
ctx = context.RequestContext('fake', 'fake', roles=['admin'])

1
openstack-common.conf
View File

@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ module=fileutils
module=local
module=log
module=loopingcall
module=policy
module=scheduler
module=scheduler.filters
module=scheduler.weights

1
requirements.txt
View File

@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ oslo.db>=1.7.0,<1.8.0 # Apache-2.0
oslo.i18n>=1.5.0,<1.6.0 # Apache-2.0
oslo.log>=1.0.0,<1.1.0 # Apache-2.0
oslo.messaging>=1.8.0,<1.9.0 # Apache-2.0
oslo.policy>=0.3.1,<0.4.0 # Apache-2.0
oslo.rootwrap>=1.6.0,<1.7.0 # Apache-2.0
oslo.serialization>=1.4.0,<1.5.0 # Apache-2.0
oslo.utils>=1.4.0,<1.5.0 # Apache-2.0