Add optional H203 to check that assertIs(Not)None is used
...instead of assertEqual(None, ...) or assertIs(None, ...) and their
negations.
Apparently that's a thing that people want? At any rate, 30+ projects
have this bug marked "Fix Released". However, without a check to keep
them from regressing, there is a long tail of follow-up patches that
distracts developers and reviewers from addressing user-facing bugs. See
the following Nova changes, spread out over the course of a year, for an
example:
If3824356ddf4e6e2d91f6bc2fbfa41946d8463cc
I09f38e219931e0d7ad27f04861d1ebbc3b5e2c5f
Iee1379b941f93388900e89388676000b845fc8fc
I0d38a82e78fbe94657ab9a71c08422007843d179
I9316c0b125aa87b6ebfa996a559c3551093ea711
I406ea23b0e78f45f16306813e4111a95716cd6b0
Ic8cb1192e001409d827c8da55fe536681895944b
Add a check for it in the interest of not wasting reviewer time or
having more code churn than necessary.
Change-Id: Iad65cb6399f4f933cbd9f503c88ce144387d39b5
Related-Bug: #1280522
This commit is contained in:
@@ -304,6 +304,11 @@ exception possible should be used.
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(exception.InstanceNotFound):
|
||||
db.instance_get_by_uuid(elevated, instance_uuid)
|
||||
|
||||
- [H203] Unit test assertions tend to give better messages for more specific
|
||||
assertions. As a result, ``assertIsNone(...)`` is preferred over
|
||||
``assertEqual(None, ...)`` and ``assertIs(None, ...)``, and
|
||||
``assertIsNotNone(...)`` is preferred over ``assertNotEqual(None, ...)``
|
||||
and ``assertIsNot(None, ...)``. Off by default.
|
||||
|
||||
OpenStack Trademark
|
||||
-------------------
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,8 +12,11 @@
|
||||
|
||||
# module cannot be called except since that is a reserved word
|
||||
|
||||
import ast
|
||||
import re
|
||||
|
||||
from six import PY2
|
||||
|
||||
from hacking import core
|
||||
|
||||
RE_ASSERT_RAISES_EXCEPTION = re.compile(r"self\.assertRaises\(Exception[,\)]")
|
||||
@@ -55,3 +58,74 @@ def hacking_except_format_assert(logical_line, noqa):
|
||||
return
|
||||
if RE_ASSERT_RAISES_EXCEPTION.search(logical_line):
|
||||
yield 1, "H202: assertRaises Exception too broad"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def is_none(node):
|
||||
'''Check whether an AST node corresponds to None.
|
||||
|
||||
In Python 2 None uses the same ast.Name class that variables etc. use,
|
||||
but in Python 3 there is a new ast.NameConstant class.
|
||||
'''
|
||||
if PY2:
|
||||
return isinstance(node, ast.Name) and node.id == 'None'
|
||||
return isinstance(node, ast.NameConstant) and node.value is None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class NoneArgChecker(ast.NodeVisitor):
|
||||
'''NodeVisitor to check function calls for None arguments.
|
||||
|
||||
:param func_name: only check calls to functions with this name
|
||||
:param num_args: number of arguments to check for None
|
||||
|
||||
self.none_found will be True if any None arguments were found.
|
||||
'''
|
||||
def __init__(self, func_name, num_args=2):
|
||||
self.func_name = func_name
|
||||
self.num_args = num_args
|
||||
self.none_found = False
|
||||
|
||||
def visit_Call(self, node):
|
||||
if isinstance(node.func, ast.Attribute):
|
||||
local_func_name = node.func.attr
|
||||
elif isinstance(node.func, ast.Name):
|
||||
local_func_name = node.func.id
|
||||
else: # ast.Subscript, etc. -- ignore
|
||||
local_func_name = None
|
||||
|
||||
if local_func_name == self.func_name:
|
||||
args_to_check = node.args[:self.num_args]
|
||||
self.none_found |= any(is_none(x) for x in args_to_check)
|
||||
self.generic_visit(node)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@core.flake8ext
|
||||
@core.off_by_default
|
||||
def hacking_assert_is_none(logical_line, noqa):
|
||||
"""Use assertIs(Not)None to check for None in assertions.
|
||||
|
||||
Okay: self.assertEqual('foo', 'bar')
|
||||
Okay: self.assertNotEqual('foo', {}.get('bar', None))
|
||||
Okay: self.assertIs('foo', 'bar')
|
||||
Okay: self.assertIsNot('foo', 'bar', None)
|
||||
Okay: foo(self.assertIsNot('foo', 'bar'))
|
||||
H203: self.assertEqual(None, 'foo')
|
||||
H203: self.assertNotEqual('foo', None)
|
||||
H203: self.assertIs(None, 'foo', 'bar')
|
||||
H203: self.assertIsNot('foo', None, 'bar')
|
||||
H203: foo(self.assertIsNot('foo', None, 'bar'))
|
||||
Okay: self.assertEqual(None, 'foo') # noqa
|
||||
Okay: self.assertIs(None, 'foo') # noqa
|
||||
Okay: self.assertIsNone('foo')
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if noqa:
|
||||
return
|
||||
for func_name in ('assertEqual', 'assertIs', 'assertNotEqual',
|
||||
'assertIsNot'):
|
||||
try:
|
||||
start = logical_line.index('.%s(' % func_name) + 1
|
||||
except ValueError:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
checker = NoneArgChecker(func_name)
|
||||
checker.visit(ast.parse(logical_line))
|
||||
if checker.none_found:
|
||||
yield start, "H203: Use assertIs(Not)None to check for None"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ class HackingTestCase(hacking.tests.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_pep8(self):
|
||||
|
||||
# NOTE(jecarey): Add tests marked as off_by_default to enable testing
|
||||
turn_on = set(['H106', 'H904'])
|
||||
turn_on = set(['H106', 'H203', 'H904'])
|
||||
if self.options.select:
|
||||
turn_on.update(self.options.select)
|
||||
self.options.select = tuple(turn_on)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ flake8.extension =
|
||||
H106 = hacking.checks.vim_check:no_vim_headers
|
||||
H201 = hacking.checks.except_checks:hacking_except_format
|
||||
H202 = hacking.checks.except_checks:hacking_except_format_assert
|
||||
H203 = hacking.checks.except_checks:hacking_assert_is_none
|
||||
H231 = hacking.checks.python23:hacking_python3x_except_compatible
|
||||
H232 = hacking.checks.python23:hacking_python3x_octal_literals
|
||||
H233 = hacking.checks.python23:hacking_python3x_print_function
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user