From 57271af149fa37ef98257a2728d25fe2d7b7eab6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Will Roberts Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:38:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] some notes and cleanups to README.rst --- README.rst | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst index 3de7c81..c5de0f1 100644 --- a/README.rst +++ b/README.rst @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ expressions like the following: It returns the time as a number of seconds (an integer value if possible, otherwise a floating-point number):: - from pytimeparse.timeparse import timeparse + >>> from pytimeparse.timeparse import timeparse >>> timeparse('1.2 minutes') 72 @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ A number of seconds can be converted back into a string using the ``datetime`` module in the standard library, as noted in `this other StackOverflow question `_:: - from pytimeparse.timeparse import timeparse - import datetime + >>> from pytimeparse.timeparse import timeparse + >>> import datetime >>> timeparse('1 day, 14:20:16') 138016 >>> str(datetime.timedelta(seconds=138016)) @@ -72,3 +72,4 @@ Future work 1. Give the user more flexibility over which characters to use as separators between fields in a time expression (e.g., ``+`` might be useful). +2. Internationalisation?