Merge "Add a conductor considerations section"

doc/source/conductors.rst

@@ -24,9 +24,41 @@ They are responsible for the following:
 
 .. note::
 
-     They are inspired by and have similar responsiblities
+     They are inspired by and have similar responsibilities
      as `railroad conductors`_.
 
+Considerations
+==============
+
+Some usage considerations should be used when using a conductor to make sure
+it's used in a safe and reliable manner. Eventually we hope to make these
+non-issues but for now they are worth mentioning.
+
+Endless cycling
+---------------
+
+**What:** Jobs that fail (due to some type of internal error) on one conductor
+will be abandoned by that conductor and then another conductor may experience
+those same errors and abandon it (and repeat). This will create a job
+abandonment cycle that will continue for as long as the job exists in an
+claimable state.
+
+**Example:**
+
+.. image:: img/conductor_cycle.png
+   :scale: 70%
+   :alt: Conductor cycling
+
+**Alleviate by:**
+
+#. Forcefully delete jobs that have been failing continuously after a given
+   number of conductor attempts. This can be either done manually or
+   automatically via scripts (or other associated monitoring).
+#. Resolve the internal error's cause (storage backend failure, other...).
+#. Help implement `jobboard garbage binning`_.
+
+.. _jobboard garbage binning: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/taskflow/+spec/jobboard-garbage-bin
+
 Interfaces
 ==========
 

doc/source/jobs.rst

@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ the engine can immediately stop doing further work. The effect that this causes
 is that when a claim is lost another engine can immediately attempt to acquire
 the claim that was previously lost and it *could* begin working on the
 unfinished tasks that the later engine may also still be executing (since that
-engine is not yet aware that it has lost the claim).
+engine is not yet aware that it has *lost* the claim).
 
 **TLDR:** not `preemptable`_, possible to become aware of losing a claim
 after the fact (at the next state change), another engine could have acquired
@@ -235,8 +235,8 @@ the claim by then, therefore both would be *working* on a job.
 
 #. Delay claiming partially completed work by adding a wait period (to allow
    the previous engine to coalesce) before working on a partially completed job
-   (combine this with the prior suggestions and dual-engine issues should be
+   (combine this with the prior suggestions and *most* dual-engine issues
-   avoided).
+   should be avoided).
 
 .. _idempotent: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idempotence
 .. _preemptable: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preemption_%28computing%29

doc/source/workers.rst

@@ -7,8 +7,7 @@ Overview
 
 This is engine that schedules tasks to **workers** -- separate processes
 dedicated for certain atoms execution, possibly running on other machines,
-connected via `amqp`_ (or other supported `kombu
+connected via `amqp`_ (or other supported `kombu`_ transports).
-<http://kombu.readthedocs.org/>`_ transports).
 
 .. note::
 
@@ -18,6 +17,7 @@ connected via `amqp`_ (or other supported `kombu
     production ready.
 
 .. _blueprint page: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/taskflow?searchtext=wbe
+.. _kombu: http://kombu.readthedocs.org/
 
 Terminology
 -----------