openstack/deb-python-taskflow
Code Issues Proposed changes

Allow just specifying 'workers' for WBE entrypoint

Browse Source 
Instead of requiring and only finding 'worker-based' just
instead add the ability to use 'workers' as the addition
of '-based' doesn't add much value and isn't really that
beneficial/useful to have to type/require.

Change-Id: Icacb933e87147e421589457338d13fd8d59e0e55
This commit is contained in:
Joshua Harlow
2015-01-23 14:21:59 -08:00
parent e9c250af57
commit e3e2950bf5
2 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
doc/source/engines.rst
View File

@@ -182,10 +182,10 @@ using your desired execution model.
:pybug:`22393` and others...) as the most recent python version (which :pybug:`22393` and others...) as the most recent python version (which
themselves have a variety of ongoing/recent bugs). themselves have a variety of ongoing/recent bugs).
Worker-based Workers
------------ -------
**Engine type**: ``'worker-based'`` **Engine type**: ``'worker-based'`` or ``'workers'``
.. note:: Since this engine is significantly more complicated (and .. note:: Since this engine is significantly more complicated (and
different) then the others we thought it appropriate to devote a different) then the others we thought it appropriate to devote a

1
setup.cfg
View File

@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ taskflow.engines =
serial = taskflow.engines.action_engine.engine:SerialActionEngine serial = taskflow.engines.action_engine.engine:SerialActionEngine
parallel = taskflow.engines.action_engine.engine:ParallelActionEngine parallel = taskflow.engines.action_engine.engine:ParallelActionEngine
worker-based = taskflow.engines.worker_based.engine:WorkerBasedActionEngine worker-based = taskflow.engines.worker_based.engine:WorkerBasedActionEngine
workers = taskflow.engines.worker_based.engine:WorkerBasedActionEngine
[nosetests] [nosetests]
cover-erase = true cover-erase = true