Merge "Move FAQ to a section-based format"
This commit is contained in:
Jenkins
Gerrit Code Review
commit
7f48f7b3e3
@ -2,96 +2,117 @@
|
||||
FAQ
|
||||
===
|
||||
|
||||
- `General Questions <#general>`__
|
||||
- `Operation and Configuration <#ops_conf>`__
|
||||
- `Miscellaneous <#misc>`__
|
||||
.. contents::
|
||||
:local:
|
||||
|
||||
General Questions
|
||||
=================
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Can I use DevStack for production?
|
||||
Can I use DevStack for production?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
A: DevStack is targeted at developers and CI systems to use the
|
||||
raw upstream code. It makes many choices that are not appropriate
|
||||
for production systems.
|
||||
DevStack is targeted at developers and CI systems to use the raw
|
||||
upstream code. It makes many choices that are not appropriate for
|
||||
production systems.
|
||||
|
||||
Your best choice is probably to choose a `distribution of
|
||||
OpenStack
|
||||
<https://www.openstack.org/marketplace/distros>`__.
|
||||
Your best choice is probably to choose a `distribution of OpenStack
|
||||
<https://www.openstack.org/marketplace/distros/distribution>`__.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Why a shell script, why not chef/puppet/...
|
||||
A: The script is meant to be read by humans (as well as ran by
|
||||
computers); it is the primary documentation after all. Using a
|
||||
recipe system requires everyone to agree and understand chef or
|
||||
puppet.
|
||||
Why a shell script, why not chef/puppet/...
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Q: I'd like to help!
|
||||
A: That isn't a question, but please do! The source for DevStack is
|
||||
at
|
||||
`git.openstack.org <https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/devstack>`__
|
||||
and bug reports go to
|
||||
`LaunchPad <http://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/>`__. Contributions
|
||||
follow the usual process as described in the `developer
|
||||
guide <http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html>`__. This Sphinx
|
||||
documentation is housed in the doc directory.
|
||||
The script is meant to be read by humans (as well as ran by
|
||||
computers); it is the primary documentation after all. Using a recipe
|
||||
system requires everyone to agree and understand chef or puppet.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Why not use packages?
|
||||
A: Unlike packages, DevStack leaves your cloud ready to develop -
|
||||
I'd like to help!
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
That isn't a question, but please do! The source for DevStack is at
|
||||
`git.openstack.org
|
||||
<https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/devstack>`__ and bug
|
||||
reports go to `LaunchPad
|
||||
<http://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/>`__. Contributions follow the
|
||||
usual process as described in the `developer guide
|
||||
<http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html>`__. This
|
||||
Sphinx documentation is housed in the doc directory.
|
||||
|
||||
Why not use packages?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Unlike packages, DevStack leaves your cloud ready to develop -
|
||||
checkouts of the code and services running in screen. However, many
|
||||
people are doing the hard work of packaging and recipes for
|
||||
production deployments.
|
||||
people are doing the hard work of packaging and recipes for production
|
||||
deployments.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Why isn't $MY\_FAVORITE\_DISTRO supported?
|
||||
A: DevStack is meant for developers and those who want to see how
|
||||
OpenStack really works. DevStack is known to run on the
|
||||
distro/release combinations listed in ``README.md``. DevStack is
|
||||
only supported on releases other than those documented in
|
||||
``README.md`` on a best-effort basis.
|
||||
Why isn't $MY\_FAVORITE\_DISTRO supported?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Are there any differences between Ubuntu and Centos/Fedora support?
|
||||
A: Both should work well and are tested by DevStack CI.
|
||||
DevStack is meant for developers and those who want to see how
|
||||
OpenStack really works. DevStack is known to run on the distro/release
|
||||
combinations listed in ``README.md``. DevStack is only supported on
|
||||
releases other than those documented in ``README.md`` on a best-effort
|
||||
basis.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Why can't I use another shell?
|
||||
A: DevStack now uses some specific bash-ism that require Bash 4, such
|
||||
as associative arrays. Simple compatibility patches have been accepted
|
||||
in the past when they are not complex, at this point no additional
|
||||
Are there any differences between Ubuntu and Centos/Fedora support?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Both should work well and are tested by DevStack CI.
|
||||
|
||||
Why can't I use another shell?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
DevStack now uses some specific bash-ism that require Bash 4, such as
|
||||
associative arrays. Simple compatibility patches have been accepted in
|
||||
the past when they are not complex, at this point no additional
|
||||
compatibility patches will be considered except for shells matching
|
||||
the array functionality as it is very ingrained in the repo and project
|
||||
management.
|
||||
the array functionality as it is very ingrained in the repo and
|
||||
project management.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Can I test on OS/X?
|
||||
A: Some people have success with bash 4 installed via
|
||||
homebrew to keep running tests on OS/X.
|
||||
Can I test on OS/X?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Some people have success with bash 4 installed via homebrew to keep
|
||||
running tests on OS/X.
|
||||
|
||||
Operation and Configuration
|
||||
===========================
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Can DevStack handle a multi-node installation?
|
||||
A: Yes, see :doc:`multinode lab guide <guides/multinode-lab>`
|
||||
Can DevStack handle a multi-node installation?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Q: How can I document the environment that DevStack is using?
|
||||
A: DevStack includes a script (``tools/info.sh``) that gathers the
|
||||
versions of the relevant installed apt packages, pip packages and
|
||||
git repos. This is a good way to verify what Python modules are
|
||||
Yes, see :doc:`multinode lab guide <guides/multinode-lab>`
|
||||
|
||||
How can I document the environment that DevStack is using?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
DevStack includes a script (``tools/info.sh``) that gathers the
|
||||
versions of the relevant installed apt packages, pip packages and git
|
||||
repos. This is a good way to verify what Python modules are
|
||||
installed.
|
||||
|
||||
Q: How do I turn off a service that is enabled by default?
|
||||
A: Services can be turned off by adding ``disable_service xxx`` to
|
||||
How do I turn off a service that is enabled by default?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Services can be turned off by adding ``disable_service xxx`` to
|
||||
``local.conf`` (using ``n-vol`` in this example):
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
disable_service n-vol
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Is enabling a service that defaults to off done with the reverse of the above?
|
||||
A: Of course!
|
||||
Is enabling a service that defaults to off done with the reverse of the above?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
Of course!
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
enable_service qpid
|
||||
|
||||
Q: How do I run a specific OpenStack milestone?
|
||||
A: OpenStack milestones have tags set in the git repo. Set the
|
||||
How do I run a specific OpenStack milestone?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
OpenStack milestones have tags set in the git repo. Set the
|
||||
appropriate tag in the ``*_BRANCH`` variables in ``local.conf``.
|
||||
Swift is on its own release schedule so pick a tag in the Swift repo
|
||||
that is just before the milestone release. For example:
|
||||
@ -107,16 +128,16 @@ Q: How do I run a specific OpenStack milestone?
|
||||
NEUTRON_BRANCH=stable/kilo
|
||||
SWIFT_BRANCH=2.3.0
|
||||
|
||||
Q: What can I do about RabbitMQ not wanting to start on my fresh new VM?
|
||||
A: This is often caused by ``erlang`` not being happy with the
|
||||
hostname resolving to a reachable IP address. Make sure your
|
||||
hostname resolves to a working IP address; setting it to 127.0.0.1
|
||||
in ``/etc/hosts`` is often good enough for a single-node
|
||||
installation. And in an extreme case, use ``clean.sh`` to eradicate
|
||||
it and try again.
|
||||
What can I do about RabbitMQ not wanting to start on my fresh new VM?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Q: How can I set up Heat in stand-alone configuration?
|
||||
A: Configure ``local.conf`` thusly:
|
||||
This is often caused by ``erlang`` not being happy with the hostname
|
||||
resolving to a reachable IP address. Make sure your hostname resolves
|
||||
to a working IP address; setting it to 127.0.0.1 in ``/etc/hosts`` is
|
||||
often good enough for a single-node installation. And in an extreme
|
||||
case, use ``clean.sh`` to eradicate it and try again.
|
||||
|
||||
Configure ``local.conf`` thusly:
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
@ -126,8 +147,10 @@ Q: How can I set up Heat in stand-alone configuration?
|
||||
KEYSTONE_SERVICE_HOST=<keystone-host>
|
||||
KEYSTONE_AUTH_HOST=<keystone-host>
|
||||
|
||||
Q: Why are my configuration changes ignored?
|
||||
A: You may have run into the package prerequisite installation
|
||||
Why are my configuration changes ignored?
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
You may have run into the package prerequisite installation
|
||||
timeout. ``tools/install_prereqs.sh`` has a timer that skips the
|
||||
package installation checks if it was run within the last
|
||||
``PREREQ_RERUN_HOURS`` hours (default is 2). To override this, set
|
||||
@ -136,12 +159,13 @@ Q: Why are my configuration changes ignored?
|
||||
Miscellaneous
|
||||
=============
|
||||
|
||||
Q: ``tools/fixup_stuff.sh`` is broken and shouldn't 'fix' just one version of packages.
|
||||
A: [Another not-a-question] No it isn't. Stuff in there is to
|
||||
correct problems in an environment that need to be fixed elsewhere
|
||||
or may/will be fixed in a future release. In the case of
|
||||
``httplib2`` and ``prettytable`` specific problems with specific
|
||||
versions are being worked around. If later releases have those
|
||||
problems than we'll add them to the script. Knowing about the broken
|
||||
future releases is valuable rather than polling to see if it has
|
||||
been fixed.
|
||||
``tools/fixup_stuff.sh`` is broken and shouldn't 'fix' just one version of packages.
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Stuff in there is to correct problems in an environment that need to
|
||||
be fixed elsewhere or may/will be fixed in a future release. In the
|
||||
case of ``httplib2`` and ``prettytable`` specific problems with
|
||||
specific versions are being worked around. If later releases have
|
||||
those problems than we'll add them to the script. Knowing about the
|
||||
broken future releases is valuable rather than polling to see if it
|
||||
has been fixed.
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user