ef8c5b9358
Patch Set 8: (3 comments) Patch-set: 8 Label: Verified=0
109 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
109 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
{
|
|
"comments": [
|
|
{
|
|
"key": {
|
|
"uuid": "bacf61ea_f18268ff",
|
|
"filename": "specs/10.0/role-decomposition.rst",
|
|
"patchSetId": 8
|
|
},
|
|
"lineNbr": 37,
|
|
"author": {
|
|
"id": 14985
|
|
},
|
|
"writtenOn": "2016-07-28T20:40:26Z",
|
|
"side": 1,
|
|
"message": "Perhaps we should include Controller so people know this is controller functionality (rather than say murano)? This would also make sense where we also have some neutron functionality deployed on things like compute nodes.",
|
|
"revId": "47dcf9c766426932fe96feef59874ee0a4bd959c",
|
|
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
|
"unresolved": false
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"key": {
|
|
"uuid": "bacf61ea_18f0d5fd",
|
|
"filename": "specs/10.0/role-decomposition.rst",
|
|
"patchSetId": 8
|
|
},
|
|
"lineNbr": 37,
|
|
"author": {
|
|
"id": 12559
|
|
},
|
|
"writtenOn": "2016-07-29T15:20:13Z",
|
|
"side": 1,
|
|
"message": "I have fixed this part a little bit. We will have role and tags assigned to the node.",
|
|
"parentUuid": "bacf61ea_f18268ff",
|
|
"revId": "47dcf9c766426932fe96feef59874ee0a4bd959c",
|
|
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
|
"unresolved": false
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"key": {
|
|
"uuid": "bacf61ea_f65a5e82",
|
|
"filename": "specs/10.0/role-decomposition.rst",
|
|
"patchSetId": 8
|
|
},
|
|
"lineNbr": 66,
|
|
"author": {
|
|
"id": 14985
|
|
},
|
|
"writtenOn": "2016-07-28T20:40:26Z",
|
|
"side": 1,
|
|
"message": "How are we handling the validation and perhaps colocation of functions on nodes? For example mysql requires a corosync cluster which i guess in itself is a role that needs to get assigned a set of nodes. Rabbitmq is another one or are we just to assume that if these roles get assigned to another node we will automagically extend the corosync cluster nodes to include these.",
|
|
"revId": "47dcf9c766426932fe96feef59874ee0a4bd959c",
|
|
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
|
"unresolved": false
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"key": {
|
|
"uuid": "bacf61ea_0af23e6f",
|
|
"filename": "specs/10.0/role-decomposition.rst",
|
|
"patchSetId": 8
|
|
},
|
|
"lineNbr": 66,
|
|
"author": {
|
|
"id": 12559
|
|
},
|
|
"writtenOn": "2016-07-29T15:20:13Z",
|
|
"side": 1,
|
|
"message": "I\u0027m assuming we will extend corosync cluster automatically.",
|
|
"parentUuid": "bacf61ea_f65a5e82",
|
|
"revId": "47dcf9c766426932fe96feef59874ee0a4bd959c",
|
|
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
|
"unresolved": false
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"key": {
|
|
"uuid": "bacf61ea_31e880e2",
|
|
"filename": "specs/10.0/role-decomposition.rst",
|
|
"patchSetId": 8
|
|
},
|
|
"lineNbr": 138,
|
|
"author": {
|
|
"id": 14985
|
|
},
|
|
"writtenOn": "2016-07-28T20:40:26Z",
|
|
"side": 1,
|
|
"message": "I think controller::corosync would be beneficial to help with the splitting off of rabbit/mysql and make it easier to run the correct clustering tasks as necessary and might make it better to ensure that the end user is aware of the corosync requirement",
|
|
"revId": "47dcf9c766426932fe96feef59874ee0a4bd959c",
|
|
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
|
"unresolved": false
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"key": {
|
|
"uuid": "bacf61ea_aaa4d2a5",
|
|
"filename": "specs/10.0/role-decomposition.rst",
|
|
"patchSetId": 8
|
|
},
|
|
"lineNbr": 138,
|
|
"author": {
|
|
"id": 12559
|
|
},
|
|
"writtenOn": "2016-07-29T15:20:13Z",
|
|
"side": 1,
|
|
"message": "This tag was not brought up as major for scale-related things. But, yep, we can separate this part of controller later.",
|
|
"parentUuid": "bacf61ea_31e880e2",
|
|
"revId": "47dcf9c766426932fe96feef59874ee0a4bd959c",
|
|
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
|
"unresolved": false
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |