glance/glance/common/property_utils.py
Zane Bitter 5c17e4c7ef Move policy defaults into code
Instead of a default policy.json file, policy defaults are now defined
in code. An operator need not supply policy.json data except to the
extent they want to override the defaults. Currently an empty
policy.json is still shipped because it is expected by devstack, but
this can be removed later. A sample policy.yaml file can be generated
using the genpolicy tox environment.

This partly fulfils the requirements of the policy in code goal[1].
However, because policies don't map 1:1 with APIs, it will not be
possible to fully document the policies until changes are made in how
policies are applied as proposed in https://review.opendev.org/528021

Due to the fact that existing policy files may rely on a rule named
"default" to specifiy policies not explicitly listed in the policy.json
file, all policies that are not admin-only by default now default to
"rule:default", so that the "default" rule will continue to apply to
those policies that are not listed in policy.json.

To ensure that this yields the expected policy in a standard
policy-in-code config file, the default value of the "default" rule is
now the empty string "". This is a change; between the Queens release
and now the default was set to "role:admin" to match the value specified
in the default policy.json file. An installation relying on both the
"default" rule for some policies and the default value of the default
rule may end up with a more permissive policy after upgrading. It's
likely that no such policies exist in the wild, because prior to the
Queens release the default value for the "default" rule was "@" (allow
all requests), so anybody relying on this rule will surely have
specified it explicitly in their policy.json.

Policies whose default is "role:admin" no longer use the "default" rule.
Therefore existing policy.json files that rely on the "default" rule for
those policies, and who have specified a value for the "default" rule
that is more permissive, will result in a more restrictive policy after
upgrading. It is unlikely that any of these policies exist in the wild
either.

[1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/queens/policy-in-code.html

Change-Id: I8d1ccf5844078cc0b1652fb1130794daf07cedbc
2020-01-06 12:56:30 -05:00

250 lines
9.4 KiB
Python

# Copyright 2013 Rackspace
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may
# not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain
# a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT
# WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the
# License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under the License.
import re
import sys
from oslo_config import cfg
from oslo_log import log as logging
from oslo_policy import policy
from six.moves import configparser
import glance.api.policy
from glance.common import exception
from glance.i18n import _, _LE, _LW
# SafeConfigParser was deprecated in Python 3.2
if sys.version_info >= (3, 2):
CONFIG = configparser.ConfigParser()
else:
CONFIG = configparser.SafeConfigParser()
LOG = logging.getLogger(__name__)
property_opts = [
cfg.StrOpt('property_protection_file',
help=_("""
The location of the property protection file.
Provide a valid path to the property protection file which contains
the rules for property protections and the roles/policies associated
with them.
A property protection file, when set, restricts the Glance image
properties to be created, read, updated and/or deleted by a specific
set of users that are identified by either roles or policies.
If this configuration option is not set, by default, property
protections won't be enforced. If a value is specified and the file
is not found, the glance-api service will fail to start.
More information on property protections can be found at:
https://docs.openstack.org/glance/latest/admin/property-protections.html
Possible values:
* Empty string
* Valid path to the property protection configuration file
Related options:
* property_protection_rule_format
""")),
cfg.StrOpt('property_protection_rule_format',
default='roles',
choices=('roles', 'policies'),
help=_("""
Rule format for property protection.
Provide the desired way to set property protection on Glance
image properties. The two permissible values are ``roles``
and ``policies``. The default value is ``roles``.
If the value is ``roles``, the property protection file must
contain a comma separated list of user roles indicating
permissions for each of the CRUD operations on each property
being protected. If set to ``policies``, a policy defined in
policy.json is used to express property protections for each
of the CRUD operations. Examples of how property protections
are enforced based on ``roles`` or ``policies`` can be found at:
https://docs.openstack.org/glance/latest/admin/property-protections.html#examples
Possible values:
* roles
* policies
Related options:
* property_protection_file
""")),
]
CONF = cfg.CONF
CONF.register_opts(property_opts)
# NOTE (spredzy): Due to the particularly lengthy name of the exception
# and the number of occurrence it is raise in this file, a variable is
# created
InvalidPropProtectConf = exception.InvalidPropertyProtectionConfiguration
def is_property_protection_enabled():
if CONF.property_protection_file:
return True
return False
class PropertyRules(object):
def __init__(self, policy_enforcer=None):
self.rules = []
self.prop_exp_mapping = {}
self.policies = []
self.policy_enforcer = policy_enforcer or glance.api.policy.Enforcer()
self.prop_prot_rule_format = CONF.property_protection_rule_format
self.prop_prot_rule_format = self.prop_prot_rule_format.lower()
self._load_rules()
def _load_rules(self):
try:
conf_file = CONF.find_file(CONF.property_protection_file)
CONFIG.read(conf_file)
except Exception as e:
msg = (_LE("Couldn't find property protection file %(file)s: "
"%(error)s.") % {'file': CONF.property_protection_file,
'error': e})
LOG.error(msg)
raise InvalidPropProtectConf()
if self.prop_prot_rule_format not in ['policies', 'roles']:
msg = _LE("Invalid value '%s' for "
"'property_protection_rule_format'. "
"The permitted values are "
"'roles' and 'policies'") % self.prop_prot_rule_format
LOG.error(msg)
raise InvalidPropProtectConf()
operations = ['create', 'read', 'update', 'delete']
properties = CONFIG.sections()
for property_exp in properties:
property_dict = {}
compiled_rule = self._compile_rule(property_exp)
for operation in operations:
permissions = CONFIG.get(property_exp, operation)
if permissions:
if self.prop_prot_rule_format == 'policies':
if ',' in permissions:
LOG.error(
_LE("Multiple policies '%s' not allowed "
"for a given operation. Policies can be "
"combined in the policy file"),
permissions)
raise InvalidPropProtectConf()
self.prop_exp_mapping[compiled_rule] = property_exp
self._add_policy_rules(property_exp, operation,
permissions)
permissions = [permissions]
else:
permissions = [permission.strip() for permission in
permissions.split(',')]
if '@' in permissions and '!' in permissions:
msg = (_LE(
"Malformed property protection rule in "
"[%(prop)s] %(op)s=%(perm)s: '@' and '!' "
"are mutually exclusive") %
dict(prop=property_exp,
op=operation,
perm=permissions))
LOG.error(msg)
raise InvalidPropProtectConf()
property_dict[operation] = permissions
else:
property_dict[operation] = []
LOG.warn(
_LW('Property protection on operation %(operation)s'
' for rule %(rule)s is not found. No role will be'
' allowed to perform this operation.') %
{'operation': operation,
'rule': property_exp})
self.rules.append((compiled_rule, property_dict))
def _compile_rule(self, rule):
try:
return re.compile(rule)
except Exception as e:
msg = (_LE("Encountered a malformed property protection rule"
" %(rule)s: %(error)s.") % {'rule': rule,
'error': e})
LOG.error(msg)
raise InvalidPropProtectConf()
def _add_policy_rules(self, property_exp, action, rule):
"""Add policy rules to the policy enforcer.
For example, if the file listed as property_protection_file has:
[prop_a]
create = glance_creator
then the corresponding policy rule would be:
"prop_a:create": "rule:glance_creator"
where glance_creator is defined in policy.json. For example:
"glance_creator": "role:admin or role:glance_create_user"
"""
rule = "rule:%s" % rule
rule_name = "%s:%s" % (property_exp, action)
rule_dict = policy.Rules.from_dict({
rule_name: rule
})
self.policy_enforcer.add_rules(rule_dict)
def _check_policy(self, property_exp, action, context):
try:
action = ":".join([property_exp, action])
self.policy_enforcer.enforce(context, action, {}, registered=False)
except exception.Forbidden:
return False
return True
def check_property_rules(self, property_name, action, context):
roles = context.roles
# Include service roles to check if an action can be
# performed on the property or not
if context.service_roles:
roles.extend(context.service_roles)
if not self.rules:
return True
if action not in ['create', 'read', 'update', 'delete']:
return False
for rule_exp, rule in self.rules:
if rule_exp.search(str(property_name)):
break
else: # no matching rules
return False
rule_roles = rule.get(action)
if rule_roles:
if '!' in rule_roles:
return False
elif '@' in rule_roles:
return True
if self.prop_prot_rule_format == 'policies':
prop_exp_key = self.prop_exp_mapping[rule_exp]
return self._check_policy(prop_exp_key, action,
context)
if set(roles).intersection(set([role.lower() for role
in rule_roles])):
return True
return False