Adds a resolution for leadership process
Currently we do not have any process for addressing leadership for a program should no candidates come forward during the nomination process. This patch proposes a process. This follows the conversation on the mailing list about this topic: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-November/050760.html Change-Id: I28180c5c66c60828fde25b98a72b28c62379c035
This commit is contained in:
parent
f79bb7c7b7
commit
42f6d77f9b
@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
|||||||
|
===========================================
|
||||||
|
2014-11-28 Process for Leaderless Programs
|
||||||
|
===========================================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Should the nomination period for Program Technical Lead close and any program
|
||||||
|
subject to the decisions of the Technical Committee not have a minimum of one
|
||||||
|
eligible candidate identify themselves, the following process will be used to
|
||||||
|
determine leadership for any program in this situation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#. Programs without a minimum of one eligible candidate are identified to the
|
||||||
|
Technical Committee by the Election Officials, as soon as possible after the
|
||||||
|
nomination period has expired.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#. The Technical Committee can appoint a leader to any programs in this
|
||||||
|
situation, by mutual agreement of the Technical Committee and the proposed
|
||||||
|
appointee.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#. The appointed leader has all the same obligations and responsibilities as a
|
||||||
|
self-nominated elected Program Technical Lead.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user