From b328c943126fe69d3852475cbba8dedc2e1fad96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gerrit User 13252 <13252@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 07:35:25 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update patch set 3

Patch Set 3: Code-Review-1

(3 comments)

Patch-set: 3
Reviewer: Gerrit User 13252 <13252@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543>
Label: Code-Review=-1, 9d8c5cc481ad83b40e033fb943f79ce81c3c455a
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 13252 \u003c13252@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_13252\u003e replied on the change"}
---
 e69637440f27ff521a78be474f0826e27ed89270 | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)

diff --git a/e69637440f27ff521a78be474f0826e27ed89270 b/e69637440f27ff521a78be474f0826e27ed89270
index d09d723be..9371a4f9e 100644
--- a/e69637440f27ff521a78be474f0826e27ed89270
+++ b/e69637440f27ff521a78be474f0826e27ed89270
@@ -16,6 +16,57 @@
       "message": "I think the TC should hold off on this general policy statement and discuss it with the releases team at the upcoming PTG.  In the meantime, to deal with the murano situation, Jay has posted a special-purpose resolution to allow us to make the murano project inactive past the M-2 deadline:\n\nhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/910434\n\nIMO, we should endorse the above and then immediately approve Ghanshyam\u0027s inactivate-murano patch:\n\nhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/908859\n\nBut whatever course we take, we should do it soon.",
       "revId": "e69637440f27ff521a78be474f0826e27ed89270",
       "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
+    },
+    {
+      "unresolved": true,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "ff8b58fb_87436e74",
+        "filename": "reference/emerging-technology-and-inactive-projects.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 3
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 81,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 13252
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2024-03-07T07:35:25Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "I would be fine with adding just this part",
+      "revId": "e69637440f27ff521a78be474f0826e27ed89270",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
+    },
+    {
+      "unresolved": true,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "c290457f_6556d039",
+        "filename": "reference/emerging-technology-and-inactive-projects.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 3
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 98,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 13252
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2024-03-07T07:35:25Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "I would want the TC to make a decision in that case and not delegate this to the release team. Like with a special resolution just as for the murano case.",
+      "revId": "e69637440f27ff521a78be474f0826e27ed89270",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
+    },
+    {
+      "unresolved": true,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "3bd1f80d_356d3689",
+        "filename": "reference/emerging-technology-and-inactive-projects.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 3
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 102,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 13252
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2024-03-07T07:35:25Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "Well we can always override gate jobs via zuul config or ask the opendev team to merge patches. So making this a mandatory part of the \"inactive\" process would seem useful to me.",
+      "revId": "e69637440f27ff521a78be474f0826e27ed89270",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
     }
   ]
 }
\ No newline at end of file