The Technical Committee ("TC") is tasked with providing the technical leadership for OpenStack as a whole (all official projects, as defined below). It enforces OpenStack ideals (Openness, Transparency, Commonality, Integration, Quality...), decides on issues affecting multiple projects, forms an ultimate appeals board for technical decisions, and generally has technical oversight over all of OpenStack.
OpenStack "Project Teams" are groups of people dedicated to the completion of the OpenStack project mission, which is ''to produce a ubiquitous Open Source Cloud Computing platform that is easy to use, simple to implement, interoperable between deployments, works well at all scales, and meets the needs of users and operators of both public and private clouds.'' Project Teams may create any code repository and produce any deliverable they deem necessary to achieve their goals.
The work of project teams is performed under the oversight of the TC. Contributing to one of their associated code repositories grants you ATC status (see below). The TC has ultimate authority over which project teams are designated as official OpenStack projects. The projects are listed in projects.
Project Team Leads ("PTLs") manage day-to-day operations, drive the team goals and resolve technical disputes within their team. Each team should be self-managing by the contributors, and all disputes should be resolved through active debate and discussion by the community itself. However if a given debate cannot be clearly resolved, the PTL can decide the outcome. Although the TC is generally not involved in team-internal decisions, it still has oversight over team decisions, especially when they affect other teams or go contrary to general OpenStack goals.
The TC is composed of directly-elected members. It is partially renewed using elections every 6 months. All TC members must be OpenStack Foundation individual members. You can cumulate any other role, including Foundation Director, with a TC seat.
After each election, the TC proposes one of its members to act as the TC chair. In case of multiple candidates, it may use a single-winner election method to decide the result (see below). The Board of Directors has the authority to approve the TC chair and shall approve the proposition, unless otherwise justified by its bylaws. The TC chair is responsible for making sure meetings are held according to the rules described below, and for communicating the decisions taken during those meetings to the Board of Directors and the OpenStack community at large. It may be revoked under the conditions described in the Foundation bylaws.
The elected TC chair will seek another TC member to volunteer to serve as vice chair until the next chair election is held. The chair may delegate some regular duties to the vice chair. In addition to any delegated tasks, the vice chair is responsible for being ready to step in and fulfill the responsibilities of the TC chair when the elected chair is not available.
The current TC chair is in charge of the next TC chair election, and stays in charge of TC chair duties until the next TC chair is elected.
The community should not wait for a formal meeting to raise issues or bring questions to the Technical Committee (see /resolutions/20170425-drop-tc-weekly-meetings). In most cases, asynchronous communication via email or gerrit is preferred over meetings. If a topic will require significant discussion or to need input from members of the community other than the committee, start a mailing list discussion on
openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org and use the subject tag
[tc] to bring it to the attention of Technical Committee members.
TC status meetings are public and held monthly in the
#openstack-tc channel on the freenode IRC network. The meeting time is decided among TC members after each election. The TC maintains an open list of candidate topics for the agenda on the wiki. Anyone may add items to the list, and the chair or vice chair will set and publicize the agenda before each meeting.
For a meeting to be actually held, at least half of the members need to be present (rounded up: in a 13-member committee that means a minimum of 7 people present). Non-members affected by a given discussion are strongly encouraged to participate in the meeting and voice their opinion, though only TC members can ultimately cast a vote.
Motions presented before the TC should be discussed publicly to give a chance to the wider community to express their opinion. Motions should therefore be announced on the development mailing list and posted to Gerrit for review for a minimum of 7 calendar days.
TC members can vote positively, negatively, or abstain (using the "RollCall-Vote" in Gerrit). Decisions need more positive votes than negative votes (ties mean the motion is rejected), and a minimum of positive votes of at least one third of the total number of TC members (rounded up: in a 13-member committee that means a minimum of 5 approvers). After a motion receives sufficient votes to pass, it must stay open for further comments and voting for a minimum of 3 calendar days.
Patches with motions should use the gerrit topic tag
PTL seats are completely renewed every development cycle. A separate election is run for each project team. These elections are collectively held no later than 3 weeks prior to each cycle final release date (on or before 'R-3' week) and should be held open for no less than four business days.
If a PTL seat is vacated before the end of the cycle for which the individual was elected, the TC will appoint a new PTL, in consultation with the outgoing PTL and any interested candidates, following the process for leaderless project teams (see /resolutions/20141128-elections-process-for-leaderless-programs). An email must be sent to the
openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org mailing list announcing the change in leadership. A patch must also be submitted to the openstack/governance repository updating the project's PTL information in
projects.yaml, which must be approved by the TC in order for the appointed candidate to officially assume PTL responsibilities.
Voters for a given project's PTL election are the Active Project Contributors ("APC"), which are a subset of the Foundation Individual Members. Individual Members who committed a change to a repository of a project over the last two 6-month release cycles are considered APC for that project team.
Any APC can propose their candidacy for the corresponding project PTL election. Sitting PTLs are eligible to run for re-election each cycle, provided they continue to meet the criteria.
The TC seats are partially renewed twice a year using staggered elections. Members are elected for a term that expires at the conclusion of the second scheduled election after the start of their term or after 14 months, whichever is shorter. For this election we'll use a multiple-winner election system see below). The election is held no earlier than 6 weeks and no later than 4 weeks prior to each cycle final release date (between 'R-6' and 'R-4' week), with elections held open for no less than four business days.
If required, TC and PTL elections can be held as combined election.
If a seat on the TC is vacated before the end of the term for which the member was elected, the TC will select a replacement to serve out the remainder of the term. The mechanism for selecting the replacement depends on when the seat is vacated relative to the beginning of the candidacy period for the next scheduled TC election. Selected candidates must meet all other constraints for membership in the TC.
The TC seats are elected by the Active Technical Contributors ("ATC"), which are a subset of the Foundation Individual Members. Individual Members who committed a change to a repository under any of the official OpenStack Project Teams (as defined in projects) over the last two 6-month release cycles are automatically considered ATC. Specific contributors who did not have a change recently accepted in one of the OpenStack projects but nevertheless feel their contribution to the OpenStack project is technical in nature (bug triaging not tracked in Gerrit, for example) can exceptionally apply for ATC either by sending an email to the TC chair or by being nominated by an existing ATC via email to the TC chair. Final approval on the exception is decided by the TC itself, and is valid one year (two elections).
Any Foundation individual member can propose their candidacy for an available, directly-elected TC seat. Appendix 4 of the Foundation Bylaws describe eligibility requirements and membership constraints for the Technical Committee.
The Q3 2019 elections elected 6 seats, for a total of 13 members for the Q3-Q4 2019 TC membership. Over 2020 the number of TC seats will be gradually reduced to 9 members, with the following number of seats to elect:
Each year after 2020, the Q1 election should renew 5 seats, and the Q3 election should renew 4 seats.
For single-winner elections, a Condorcet system shall be used.
For multiple-winner elections, a Condorcet or a STV system should be used.
Amendments to this Technical Committee charter shall be proposed in a special motion, which needs to be approved by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the total number of TC members (rounded up: in a 13-member committee that means a minimum of 9 approvers).
Patches with charter amendments should use the gerrit topic tag