8957cf7613

Based on requirements defined in [1], I believe that is a fair statement to claim cold upgrades support for Neutron. Rolling upgrades are not too far off, but not within our reach to allow us to claim assert:support-rolling-upgrade, just yet. This is mainly because of lack of full stack integration testing with services arranged in a mid-upgrade manner. This is planned for Mitaka, and I count to reconsider adding the latter tag in time for the release. [1] http://governance.openstack.org/reference/tags/assert_supports-upgrade.html#requirements Change-Id: I691325fe5f8562fb59239ecde75f0992a53d599e
This repository contains OpenStack Technical Committee reference documents and tracks official resolutions voted by the committee.
Directory structure:
- reference/
Reference documents which need to be revised over time. Some motions will just directly result in reference doc changes.
- resolutions/
When the motion does not result in a change in a reference doc, it can be expressed as a resolution. Those must be named YYYYMMDD-short-name with YYYYMMDD being the proposal date in order to allow basic sorting.
See https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/TechnicalCommittee for details.
Description
Languages
Python
95.3%
DIGITAL Command Language
3.5%
Shell
1%
C++
0.2%