hacking/README.rst
ghanshyam e6670f25f8 Fix 'ref' format errors in README file
While releasing new version in pypi, it perform the
validation on the package and give error if there is any
formatting issue.

README file is being used to upload on pypi and so validation
check fails[1] on current README due to 'ref' used for internal
doc link. Those links would not be available for outside the built doc.
This can be checked locally by:
    python setup.py check -s -r

This commit fixes those format issue by removing the ref and provide the
external links.

[1] http://logs.openstack.org/17/622317/1/check/test-release-openstack/a24116d/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-12-05_06_16_03_329613

Change-Id: I70c995b715184c2cc70b494c185c83b8190629db
2018-12-06 13:06:16 +00:00

138 lines
4.9 KiB
ReStructuredText

Introduction
============
hacking is a set of flake8 plugins that test and enforce the
`OpenStack StyleGuide <https://docs.openstack.org/hacking/latest/user/hacking.html#styleguide>`_
Hacking pins its dependencies, as a new release of some dependency can break
hacking based gating jobs. This is because new versions of dependencies can
introduce new rules, or make existing rules stricter.
Installation
============
hacking is available from pypi, so just run::
pip install hacking
This will install specific versions of ``flake8`` with the ``hacking``,
``pep8``, ``mccabe`` and ``pyflakes`` plugins.
Origin
======
Hacking started its life out as a text file in Nova's first commit. It was
initially based on the `Google Python Style Guide`_, and over time more
OpenStack specific rules were added. Hacking serves several purposes:
1. Agree on a common style guide so reviews don't get bogged down on style
nit picks. (example: docstring guidelines)
2. Make code written by many different authors easier to read by making the
style more uniform. (example: unix vs windows newlines)
3. Call out dangerous patterns and avoid them. (example: shadowing built-in
or reserved words)
Initially the hacking style guide was enforced manually by reviewers, but this
was a big waste of time so hacking, the tool, was born to automate
the process and remove the extra burden from human reviewers.
.. _`Google Python Style Guide`: https://google.github.io/styleguide/pyguide.html
Versioning
==========
hacking uses the ``major.minor.maintenance`` release notation, where maintenance
releases cannot contain new checks. This way projects can gate on hacking
by pinning on the ``major.minor`` number while accepting maintenance updates
without being concerned that a new version will break the gate with a new
check.
For example a project can depend on ``hacking>=0.10.0,<0.11.0``, and can know
that ``0.10.1`` will not fail in places where ``0.10.0`` passed.
Adding additional checks
========================
Each check is a pep8 plugin so read
- https://github.com/jcrocholl/pep8/blob/master/docs/developer.rst#contribute
The focus of new or changed rules should be to do one of the following
- Substantially increase the reviewability of the code (eg: H301, H303)
as they make it easy to understand where symbols come from)
- Catch a common programming error that may arise in the future (H201)
- Prevent a situation that would 100% of the time be -1ed by
developers (H903)
But, as always, remember that these are Guidelines. Treat them as
such. There are always times for exceptions. All new rules should
support noqa.
If a check needs to be staged in, or it does not apply to every project or its
branch, it can be added as off by default.
Requirements
------------
- The check must already have community support. We do not want to dictate
style, only enforce it.
- The canonical source of the OpenStack Style Guidelines is
`StyleGuide <https://docs.openstack.org/hacking/latest/user/hacking.html#styleguide>`_,
and hacking just enforces
them; so when adding a new check, it must be in ``HACKING.rst``
- False negatives are ok, but false positives are not
- Cannot be project specific, project specific checks should be `Local Checks`_
- Include extensive tests
- Registered as entry_points in ``setup.cfg``
- Error code must be in the relevant ``Hxxx`` group
- The check should not attempt to import modules from the code being checked.
Importing random modules, has caused all kinds of trouble for us in the past.
Enabling off-by-default checks
==============================
Some of the available checks are disabled by default. These checks are:
- [H106] Don't put vim configuration in source files.
- [H203] Use assertIs(Not)None to check for None.
- [H204] Use assert(Not)Equal to check for equality.
- [H205] Use assert(Greater|Less)(Equal) for comparison.
- [H210] Require 'autospec', 'spec', or 'spec_set' in
mock.patch/mock.patch.object calls
- [H904] Delay string interpolations at logging calls.
To enable these checks, edit the ``flake8`` section of the ``tox.ini`` file.
For example to enable H106 and H203:
.. code-block:: ini
[flake8]
enable-extensions = H106,H203
Local Checks
============
hacking supports having local changes in a source tree. They can be configured
to run in two different ways. They can be registered individually, or with
a factory function.
For individual registration, put a comma separated list of pep8 compatible
check functions into the hacking section of tox.ini. E.g.:
.. code-block:: ini
[hacking]
local-check = nova.tests.hacking.bad_code_is_terrible
Alternately, you can specify the location of a callable that will be called
at registration time and will be passed the registration function. The callable
should expect to call the passed in function on everything if wants to
register. Such as:
.. code-block:: ini
[hacking]
local-check-factory = nova.tests.hacking.factory