Stop ignoring kilo release directory in tests

Change-Id: I3a8044fd8f68442055dcf34e4c9b5079a91c51da

specs/kilo/ceilometer-gnocchi-alarm.rst

@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ None
 
 
 Usage Scenario
-==============
+--------------
 
 I want to create a autoscaling group that scale down when a statistics against
 cpu_util of a group of vm computed by Gnocchi, reach a certain threshold::
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ Dependencies
 
 None
 
-Links
-=====
+References
+----------
 
 * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/153291/

specs/kilo/cinder-scheduler-hints.rst

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ None
 
 
 Usage Scenario
-==============
+--------------
 
 For instance, request creation of `volume-A` on a different back-end than
 `volume-B` using the different_host scheduler hint::

specs/kilo/cinder-volume-type.rst

@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ None
 
 
 Usage Scenario
-==============
+--------------
 
 For volume creation take the volume_type to specific the lvm-driver::
 

specs/kilo/convergence-check-workflow.rst

@@ -43,6 +43,11 @@ trigger a check on any which now contain their full complement of inputs.
 The SyncPoint for the stack works similarly, except that when complete we
 notify the stack itself to mark the update as complete.
 
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+None
+
 Implementation
 ==============
 

specs/kilo/convergence-concurrent-workflow.rst

@@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ An exception to all of this is the case where the graph node is of the update
 type and the resource status is DELETE_IN_PROGRESS. In that case, we should
 simply create a replacement resource.
 
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+None
+
 Implementation
 ==============
 

specs/kilo/convergence-graph-progress.rst

@@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ http://www.joinfu.com/2015/01/understanding-reservations-concurrency-locking-in-
 - which probably means adding an extra integer field that is incremented on
 every write (since we can't really query on a text field).
 
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+None
+
 Implementation
 ==============
 

specs/kilo/convergence-prepare-traversal.rst

@@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ row with its own newly-generated traversal ID. In this case it should roll back
 the database changes, by deleting any newly-created Resource rows that it added
 as well as all of the SyncPoints.
 
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+None
+
 Implementation
 ==============
 

specs/kilo/convergence-resource-replacement.rst

@@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ dependent resources will update their dependency lists. The previous resource
 will be visited again in the clean-up phase of the graph, at which point it
 will be deleted.
 
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+None
+
 Implementation
 ==============
 

specs/kilo/convergence-resource-table.rst

@@ -45,6 +45,11 @@ https://github.com/zaneb/heat-convergence-prototype/blob/resumable/converge/reso
 - but those are too confusing. Once we settle on names, we should update the
 simulator code as well.)
 
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+None
+
 Implementation
 ==============
 

specs/kilo/convergence-rollback.rst

@@ -45,6 +45,11 @@ successfully complete (if any) alongside the ID of the current target template
 the stored template IDs are overwritten in such a way that we will no longer
 refer to a particular Template, delete that Template from the database.
 
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+None
+
 Implementation
 ==============
 

specs/kilo/convergence-simulator-tests.rst

@@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ using testtools primitives and passing the wrappers above as globals, rather
 than those defined in
 https://github.com/zaneb/heat-convergence-prototype/blob/resumable/converge/__init__.py#L24-L41
 
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+None
+
 Implementation
 ==============
 

specs/kilo/convergence-stack-data.rst

@@ -42,6 +42,11 @@ previous traversals should stop updating the stack data. This should be
 achieved using the "UPDATE ... WHERE ..." form as discussed in
 http://www.joinfu.com/2015/01/understanding-reservations-concurrency-locking-in-nova/
 
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+None
+
 Implementation
 ==============
 

specs/kilo/decouple-aws-os-resources.rst

@@ -23,8 +23,9 @@ Problem description
 The code structure of the resources folder is in some confusion.
 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/reorganize-resources-code-structure
 
-There is too much coupling between AWS and OS resources for reorganizing to be possible,
-for example modules: wait_condition.py, instance.py, user.py and volume.py.
+There is too much coupling between AWS and OS resources for reorganizing to be
+possible, for example modules: wait_condition.py, instance.py, user.py and
+volume.py.
 
 Proposed change
 ===============
@@ -36,14 +37,17 @@ The new code structure will be::
          |----resources
               |----aws
                    |----wait_condition.py(AWS::CloudFormation::WaitCondition)
-                   |----wait_condition_handle.py(AWS::CloudFormation::WaitConditionHandle)
-                   |----volume.py(AWS::EC2::Volume and AWS::EC2::VolumeAttachment)
+                   |----wait_condition_handle.py
+                        (AWS::CloudFormation::WaitConditionHandle)
+                   |----volume.py
+                        (AWS::EC2::Volume and AWS::EC2::VolumeAttachment)
                    |----user.py(AWS::IAM::User and AWS::IAM::AccessKey)
                    |----instance.py(AWS::EC2::Instance)
               |----openstack
                    |----wait_condition.py(OS::Heat::WaitCondition)
                    |----wait_condition_handle.py(OS::Heat::WaitConditionHandle)
-                   |----volume.py(OS::Cinder::Volume and OS::Cinder::VolumeAttachment)
+                   |----volume.py
+                        (OS::Cinder::Volume and OS::Cinder::VolumeAttachment)
                    |----access_policy.py(OS::Heat::AccessPolicy)
                    |----ha_restarter.py(OS::Heat::HARestarter)
               |----wait_condition.py(base module)

specs/kilo/detailed-resource-show.rst

@@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ and be able to look up attributes after creating their stacks even if the
 template author didn't think about them beforehand.
 
 Because these attributes can be retrieved either by the resource's client or by
-changing the template and adding them to the outputs section, this should not pose
+changing the template and adding them to the outputs section, this should not
+pose
 any more risk of revealing sensitive data than what is already possible.
 
 This can be achieved by changing the API response to also include attributes
@@ -68,9 +69,12 @@ For such resources, the API can be extended to accept a query param that will
 hold the names of the attributes to be retrived.  Something like:
 
   # API
-  /<tenant_id>/stacks/<stack_name>/<stack_id>/resources/<resource_name>?with_attr=foo&with_attr=bar
+
+  /<tenant_id>/stacks/<stack_name>/<stack_id>/resources/
+  <resource_name>?with_attr=foo&with_attr=bar
 
   # heatclient
+
   resource-show <stack_name> <resource_name> --with-attr foo --with-attr bar
 
 However, certain clients or scripts may want to consume a given attribute
@@ -79,11 +83,17 @@ things RESTful and return only the discoverable attributes of a resource; and
 another one that would only return the value of the requested attribute.
 
   # API
-  /<tenant_id>/stacks/<stack_name>/<stack_id>/resources/<resource_name>/attributes
-  /<tenant_id>/stacks/<stack_name>/<stack_id>/resources/<resource_name>/attributes/<attribute_name>
+
+  /<tenant_id>/stacks/<stack_name>/<stack_id>/resources/<resource_name>/
+  attributes
+
+  /<tenant_id>/stacks/<stack_name>/<stack_id>/resources/<resource_name>/
+  attributes/<attribute_name>
 
   # heatclient
+
   heat resource-attributes <stack-id> <resource-name>
+
   heat resource-attributes <stack-id> <resource-name> <attribute-name>
 
 Alternatives

specs/kilo/digest-intrinsic-function.rst

@@ -36,9 +36,9 @@ Add another class to run existing digest algorithms (e.g. MD5, SHA-512, etc) on
 user provided data and expose it in the HOT functions list.  The class would
 take the name of the digest algortihm and the value to be hashed.
 
-Python's ``hashlib`` natively supports md5, sha1 and sha2 (sha224, 256, 384, 512)
-on most platforms and this will be documented as being the supported list of
-algorithms.  But the cloud provider may go beyond and support more algortihms
+Python's ``hashlib`` natively supports md5, sha1 and sha2 (sha224, 256, 384,
+512) on most platforms and this will be documented as being the supported list
+of algorithms. But the cloud provider may go beyond and support more algortihms
 as well, since, depending on the way Python was built, ``hashlib`` can also use
 algorithms supported by OpenSSL.
 

specs/kilo/environment-enhancements.rst

@@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ attributes in the outputs so they can be referenced outside of the
 nested stack. We should generate these attributes dynamically.
 
 
-Proposed changes
-================
+Proposed change
+===============
 
 1. Add the concept of parameter_defaults to the environment.
    This will look like the following::
@@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ Proposed changes
    The behaviour of these parameters will be as follows:
    - if there is no parameter definition for it, it will be ignored.
    - these will be passed into all nested templates
-   - they will only be used as a default so that they can be explicitly overridden in the "parameters" section.
+   - they will only be used as a default so that they can be explicitly
+   overridden in the "parameters" section.
 
 2. Support a specially named output to Template resources that is used
    for references.

specs/kilo/implement-instanceid-for-autoscalinggroup.rst

@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ Implement 'InstanceId' for AutoScalingGroup
 
 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/implement-instanceid-for-autoscalinggroup
 
-We should support the 'InstanceId' for AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup resource
-to be compatible with AWSCloudFormation.
+We should support the 'InstanceId' for AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup
+resource to be compatible with AWSCloudFormation.
 
 Problem description
 ===================
@@ -31,17 +31,19 @@ Proposed change
 ===============
 1. Change 'LaunchConfigurationName' to be an optional property
 2. Add 'InstanceId' property, optional and non-updatable
-3. Add validate for AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup resource, make sure choose
-   one of the two properties
+3. Add validate for AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup resource, make sure
+   choose one of the two properties
 4. Modify the _get_conf_properties() function
 
-   * if specify 'InstanceId', to get the attributes of the instance, and to make a temporary
-     launch config resource, and then return the resource and its properties.
+   * if specify 'InstanceId', to get the attributes of the instance, and
+     to make a temporary launch config resource, and then return the resource
+     and its properties.
 
-     Note that the attributes include ImageId, InstanceType, KeyName, SecurityGroups.
+     Note that the attributes include ImageId, InstanceType, KeyName,
+     SecurityGroups.
 
-   * if without 'InstanceId', using the old way to get the launch config resource and
-     its properties.
+   * if without 'InstanceId', using the old way to get the launch config
+     resource and its properties.
 
 Alternatives
 ------------

specs/kilo/implement-instanceid-for-launchconfiguration.rst

@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ Implement 'InstanceId' for LaunchConfiguration
 
 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/implement-instanceid-for-launchconfiguration
 
-We should support the 'InstanceId' for AWS::AutoScaling::LaunchConfiguration resource
-to be compatible with AWSCloudFormation.
+We should support the 'InstanceId' for AWS::AutoScaling::LaunchConfiguration
+resource to be compatible with AWSCloudFormation.
 
 Problem description
 ===================
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ launch configuration to use settings from an existing instance, see:
 http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-properties-as-launchconfig.html
 http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AutoScaling/latest/DeveloperGuide/create-lc-with-instanceID.html
 
-Will be good to implement 'InstanceId' property to be compatible with AWSCloudFormation.
+Will be good to implement 'InstanceId' property to be compatible with
+AWSCloudFormation.
 
 
 Proposed change
@@ -33,8 +34,8 @@ Proposed change
    specify 'InstanceId', the other two properties are required
 4. According to the aws developer guide and implementation, allows three cases:
 
- * Without 'InstanceId', should specify 'ImageId' and 'InstanceType' properties,
-   using the old way to create the new launch configuration.
+ * Without 'InstanceId', should specify 'ImageId' and 'InstanceType'
+   properties, using the old way to create the new launch configuration.
 
  * Specify 'InstanceId' only, the new launch configuration has
    'ImageId', 'InstanceType', 'KeyName', and 'SecurityGroups'

specs/kilo/mistral-resources.rst

@@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ There is some use cases, which should be described:
 
    When stack will created, to execute workflow run next command::
 
-     heat resource-signal stack_name workflow_name -D 'Json-type execution input'
+      heat resource-signal stack_name workflow_name \
+          -D 'Json-type execution input'
 
    Execution state will be available in 'executions' attribute as a dict.
 
@@ -160,7 +161,9 @@ There is some use cases, which should be described:
             vm_id: $.vm_id
           tasks:
             create_server:
-              action: nova.servers_create name={$.vm_name} image={$.image_ref} flavor={$.flavor_ref}
+              action: >
+                nova.servers_create name={$.vm_name} image={$.image_ref}
+                flavor={$.flavor_ref}
               publish:
                 vm_id: $.id
               on-success:

specs/kilo/nova-custom-constraints.rst

@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ and apply nova flavor constraint.
 Problem description
 ===================
 
-1. Many resources have property InstanceId/Server which related with nova server,
-   but until now we haven't support nova server constraints.
+1. Many resources have property InstanceId/Server which related with nova
+   server, but until now we haven't support nova server constraints.
 2. Just define nova flavor custom constraint, but not to apply it.
 
 

specs/kilo/rich-network-prop.rst

@@ -161,6 +161,11 @@ Milestones
 Target Milestone for completion:
   Kilo-2
 
+Work Items
+----------
+
+Steps mentioned in section Proposed change describes the list of work items.
+
 Dependencies
 ============
 

specs/kilo/software-config-progress.rst

@@ -96,6 +96,11 @@ can be achieved by the hooks checking for the input ``deploy_status_aware``
 being set to ``true``. Only new heat will set this input value to ``true`` so
 the hook can check this input and behave accordingly.
 
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+None
+
 Implementation
 ==============
 

specs/kilo/software-config-trigger.rst

@@ -85,6 +85,11 @@ This could also be an appropriate umbrella blueprint to switch to using RPC
 instead of full REST calls for when config and deployment resources call
 config and deployment APIs.
 
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+None
+
 Implementation
 ==============
 

specs/kilo/software-config-zaqar.rst

@@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ that it is not necessary to create the stack users.
 signal_transport:AUTO will be modified so that ZAQAR_MESSAGE is the preferred
 method if there is a configured messaging endpoint.
 
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+None
+
 Implementation
 ==============
 

specs/kilo/stack-update-restrict.rst

@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ Problem description
 Users can (and do) worry about stack update doing wonky things. The
 update-preview endpoint addresses this partially by showing what will probably
 happen. The limitation of the preview function is that resources can raise
-UpdateReplace exceptions at any time, making it impossible to be *certain* of the
-results of an update until it is performed.
+UpdateReplace exceptions at any time, making it impossible to be *certain* of
+the results of an update until it is performed.
 
 Proposed change
 ===============
@@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ preferences, which are nested into the keys "AutoScalingScheduledAction" and
 "AutoScalingRollingUpdate". CFN preferences would be unaffected by the HOT
 version of update policies.
 
-A user would specify per-resource how aggressive an update can be with a resource.
-The restrictions could be on updating the resource at all, or just on
-destroying the resource (including UpdateReplace).
+A user would specify per-resource how aggressive an update
+can be with a resource. The restrictions could be on updating the resource at
+all, or just on destroying the resource (including UpdateReplace).
 
 The base cases here are:
 

specs/kilo/support-cinder-api-v2.rst

@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ None
 
 
 References
-==========
+----------
 
 * [1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderAPIv2
 * [2]: https://github.com/openstack/nova-specs/blob/master/specs/juno/support-cinderclient-v2.rst

specs/kilo/trove-cluster-resource.rst

@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ None
 
 
 Usage Scenario
-==============
+--------------
 
 Create the OS::Trove::Cluster resource like this::
 

specs/kilo/versioned-objects.rst

@@ -24,9 +24,11 @@ https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/versioned-objects
 
 Problem description
 ===================
-We are looking to improve the way we deal with versioning (of all sorts db/rpc/rest/templates/plugins).
-Nova has come up with the idea of versioned objects, that Ironic has also now used.
-This has now been proposed as an oslo library:  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127532/
+We are looking to improve the way we deal with versioning (of all sorts
+db/rpc/rest/templates/plugins).
+Nova has come up with the idea of versioned objects, that Ironic has also now
+used. This has now been proposed as an oslo library:
+https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127532/
 
 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-upgrades-and-versioning
 

specs/kilo/vnc-console.rst

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ We should provide a way for template developers to show console
 url(for example, vnc, rdp and spice) in stack outputs.
 
 Usage Scenario
-==============
+--------------
 
 Get novnc console url::
 
@@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ to this attribute, or URLs for all supported types when no key is provided.
 Gracefully deal with the case when the type of the console being asked for
 is not available in current deployment.
 
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+None
 
 Implementation
 ==============

tests/test_titles.py

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ import testtools
 
 def create_scenarios():
     # create a set of excluded from testing directories
-    exclude_dirs = {'templates', 'kilo'}
+    exclude_dirs = {'templates', }
     # get whole list of sub-directories in specs directory
     release_names = [x.split('/')[1] for x in glob.glob('specs/*/')]
     # generate a list of scenarious (1 scenario - for each release)
@@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ class TestTitles(testscenarios.WithScenarios, testtools.TestCase):
             template = f.read()
         base_spec = docutils.core.publish_doctree(template)
         expected_template_titles = self._get_titles(base_spec)
-
         for filename, data in self._iterate_files():
             spec = docutils.core.publish_doctree(data)
             titles = self._get_titles(spec)