Clarify resource deprecation process
The deprecation process is unclear in that it does not specify the goals of hiding (rather than removing) obsolete resource types. This has led to resources being hidden without removing their implementation, leaving existing stacks potentially inoperable. State clearly the purpose of hidden resource types, and options available to help users migrate. Change-Id: I7362c094122066f98a5c95d4c5da16cb5a5c1108
This commit is contained in:
parent
1efe82d7d6
commit
426aa3498b
@ -107,6 +107,14 @@ object from documentation and from result of :code:`resource-type-list` CLI
|
||||
command, if object is resource. Also, :code:`resource-type-show` command with
|
||||
such resource will raise `NotSupported` exception.
|
||||
|
||||
The purpose of hiding, rather than removing, obsolete resources or properties
|
||||
is to ensure that users can continue to operate existing stacks - replacing or
|
||||
removing the offending resources, or deleting the entire stack. Steps should be
|
||||
taken to ensure that these operations can succeed, e.g. by replacing a hidden
|
||||
resource type's implementation with one that is equivalent to
|
||||
``OS::Heat::None`` when the underlying API no longer exists, supplying a
|
||||
*substitute_class* for a resource type, or adding a property translation rule.
|
||||
|
||||
Using Support Status during code writing
|
||||
----------------------------------------
|
||||
When adding new objects or adding objects instead of some old (e.g. property
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user