Delete EFI boot entry duplicate labels first
Some firmware seems to take an objection with EFI nvram
entries being deleted after one is added, resulting in the
entire entry table being reset to the last known good state.
This is problematic, as ultimately deployments can time out
if we previously booted with Networking, and the machine, while
commanded to do other wise, reboots back to networking regardless.
We will now delete entries first, before proceeding.
Additionally, for general use, this pattern may serve the
community better by avoiding cases where we would have
previously just relied upon efibootmgr[0] to warn us of duplicate
entries.
[0]: 103aa22ece/src/efibootmgr.c (L228)
Change-Id: Ib61a7100a059e79a8b0901fd8f46b9bc41d657dc
Story: 2009649
Task: 43808
This commit is contained in:
Julia Kreger
parent
c824dda7a5
commit
67eddfa7e3
@ -274,12 +274,10 @@ def _run_efibootmgr(valid_efi_bootloaders, device, efi_partition,
|
||||
|
||||
# Before updating let's get information about the bootorder
|
||||
LOG.debug("Getting information about boot order.")
|
||||
utils.execute('efibootmgr', '-v')
|
||||
# NOTE(iurygregory): regex used to identify the Warning in the stderr after
|
||||
# we add the new entry. Example:
|
||||
# "efibootmgr: ** Warning ** : Boot0004 has same label ironic"
|
||||
duplicated_label = re.compile(r'^.*:\s\*\*.*\*\*\s:\s.*'
|
||||
r'Boot([0-9a-f-A-F]+)\s.*$')
|
||||
original_efi_output = utils.execute('efibootmgr', '-v')
|
||||
# NOTE(TheJulia): regex used to identify entries in the efibootmgr
|
||||
# output on stdout.
|
||||
entry_label = re.compile(r'Boot([0-9a-f-A-F]+):\s(.*).*$')
|
||||
label_id = 1
|
||||
for v_bl in valid_efi_bootloaders:
|
||||
if 'csv' in v_bl.lower():
|
||||
@ -298,20 +296,26 @@ def _run_efibootmgr(valid_efi_bootloaders, device, efi_partition,
|
||||
v_efi_bl_path = '\\' + v_bl.replace('/', '\\')
|
||||
label = 'ironic' + str(label_id)
|
||||
|
||||
# Iterate through standard out, and look for duplicates
|
||||
for line in original_efi_output[0].split('\n'):
|
||||
match = entry_label.match(line)
|
||||
# Look for the base label in the string if a line match
|
||||
# occurs, so we can identify if we need to eliminate the
|
||||
# entry.
|
||||
if match and label in match.group(2):
|
||||
boot_num = match.group(1)
|
||||
LOG.debug("Found bootnum %s matching label", boot_num)
|
||||
utils.execute('efibootmgr', '-b', boot_num, '-B')
|
||||
|
||||
LOG.debug("Adding loader %(path)s on partition %(part)s of device "
|
||||
" %(dev)s", {'path': v_efi_bl_path, 'part': efi_partition,
|
||||
'dev': device})
|
||||
# Update the nvram using efibootmgr
|
||||
# https://linux.die.net/man/8/efibootmgr
|
||||
cmd = utils.execute('efibootmgr', '-v', '-c', '-d', device,
|
||||
utils.execute('efibootmgr', '-v', '-c', '-d', device,
|
||||
'-p', efi_partition, '-w', '-L', label,
|
||||
'-l', v_efi_bl_path)
|
||||
for line in cmd[1].split('\n'):
|
||||
match = duplicated_label.match(line)
|
||||
if match:
|
||||
boot_num = match.group(1)
|
||||
LOG.debug("Found bootnum %s matching label", boot_num)
|
||||
utils.execute('efibootmgr', '-b', boot_num, '-B')
|
||||
# Increment the ID in case the loop runs again.
|
||||
label_id += 1
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -319,13 +319,17 @@ class TestImageExtension(base.IronicAgentTest):
|
||||
mock_partition.return_value = self.fake_dev
|
||||
mock_utils_efi_part.return_value = '1'
|
||||
mock_efi_bl.return_value = ['EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI']
|
||||
stdeer_msg = """
|
||||
efibootmgr: ** Warning ** : Boot0004 has same label ironic1\n
|
||||
efibootmgr: ** Warning ** : Boot0005 has same label ironic1\n
|
||||
"""
|
||||
stdout_msg = """
|
||||
BootCurrent: 0001
|
||||
Timeout: 0 seconds
|
||||
BootOrder: 0000,00001
|
||||
Boot0000: ironic1 HD(1, GPT,4f3c6294-bf9b-4208-9808-be45dfc34b5c)File(\EFI\Boot\BOOTX64.EFI)
|
||||
Boot0001: ironic2 HD(1, GPT,4f3c6294-bf9b-4208-9808-111111111112)File(\EFI\Boot\BOOTX64.EFI)
|
||||
Boot0002: VENDMAGIC FvFile(9f3c6294-bf9b-4208-9808-be45dfc34b51)
|
||||
""" # noqa This is a giant literal string for testing.
|
||||
mock_execute.side_effect = iter([('', ''), ('', ''),
|
||||
('', ''), ('', ''),
|
||||
('', ''), ('', stdeer_msg),
|
||||
(stdout_msg, ''), ('', ''),
|
||||
('', ''), ('', ''),
|
||||
('', ''), ('', '')])
|
||||
|
||||
@ -336,12 +340,11 @@ efibootmgr: ** Warning ** : Boot0005 has same label ironic1\n
|
||||
mock.call('mount', self.fake_efi_system_part,
|
||||
self.fake_dir + '/boot/efi'),
|
||||
mock.call('efibootmgr', '-v'),
|
||||
mock.call('efibootmgr', '-b', '0000', '-B'),
|
||||
mock.call('efibootmgr', '-v', '-c', '-d', self.fake_dev,
|
||||
'-p', '1', '-w',
|
||||
'-L', 'ironic1', '-l',
|
||||
'\\EFI\\BOOT\\BOOTX64.EFI'),
|
||||
mock.call('efibootmgr', '-b', '0004', '-B'),
|
||||
mock.call('efibootmgr', '-b', '0005', '-B'),
|
||||
mock.call('umount', self.fake_dir + '/boot/efi',
|
||||
attempts=3, delay_on_retry=True),
|
||||
mock.call('sync')]
|
||||
@ -356,7 +359,7 @@ efibootmgr: ** Warning ** : Boot0005 has same label ironic1\n
|
||||
mock_efi_bl.assert_called_once_with(self.fake_dir + '/boot/efi')
|
||||
mock_execute.assert_has_calls(expected)
|
||||
mock_utils_efi_part.assert_called_once_with(self.fake_dev)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(10, mock_execute.call_count)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(9, mock_execute.call_count)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(hardware, 'is_md_device', lambda *_: False)
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(os.path, 'exists', lambda *_: False)
|
||||
@ -2259,8 +2262,19 @@ efibootmgr: ** Warning ** : Boot0005 has same label ironic1\n
|
||||
# Mild difference, Ubuntu ships a file without a 0xFEFF delimiter
|
||||
# at the start of the file, where as Red Hat *does*
|
||||
csv_file_data = u'shimx64.efi,Vendor String,,Grub2MadeUSDoThis\n'
|
||||
# This test also handles deleting a pre-existing matching vendor
|
||||
# string in advance.
|
||||
dupe_entry = """
|
||||
BootCurrent: 0001
|
||||
Timeout: 0 seconds
|
||||
BootOrder: 0000,00001
|
||||
Boot0000: Vendor String HD(1, GPT,4f3c6294-bf9b-4208-9808-be45dfc34b5c)File(\EFI\Boot\BOOTX64.EFI)
|
||||
Boot0001: Vendor String HD(2, GPT,4f3c6294-bf9b-4208-9808-be45dfc34b5c)File(\EFI\Boot\BOOTX64.EFI)
|
||||
Boot0002: VENDMAGIC FvFile(9f3c6294-bf9b-4208-9808-be45dfc34b51)
|
||||
""" # noqa This is a giant literal string for testing.
|
||||
|
||||
mock_execute.side_effect = iter([('', ''), ('', ''),
|
||||
('', ''), (dupe_entry, ''),
|
||||
('', ''), ('', ''),
|
||||
('', ''), ('', ''),
|
||||
('', '')])
|
||||
@ -2271,6 +2285,8 @@ efibootmgr: ** Warning ** : Boot0005 has same label ironic1\n
|
||||
mock.call('mount', self.fake_efi_system_part,
|
||||
self.fake_dir + '/boot/efi'),
|
||||
mock.call('efibootmgr', '-v'),
|
||||
mock.call('efibootmgr', '-b', '0000', '-B'),
|
||||
mock.call('efibootmgr', '-b', '0001', '-B'),
|
||||
mock.call('efibootmgr', '-v', '-c', '-d', self.fake_dev,
|
||||
'-p', '1', '-w',
|
||||
'-L', 'Vendor String', '-l',
|
||||
@ -2285,7 +2301,7 @@ efibootmgr: ** Warning ** : Boot0005 has same label ironic1\n
|
||||
mkdir_mock.assert_called_once_with(self.fake_dir + '/boot/efi')
|
||||
mock_efi_bl.assert_called_once_with(self.fake_dir + '/boot/efi')
|
||||
mock_execute.assert_has_calls(expected)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(7, mock_execute.call_count)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(9, mock_execute.call_count)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(os.path, 'exists', lambda *_: False)
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(image, '_get_efi_bootloaders', autospec=True)
|
||||
@ -2453,6 +2469,7 @@ efibootmgr: ** Warning ** : Boot0005 has same label ironic1\n
|
||||
mock_execute.assert_has_calls(expected)
|
||||
|
||||
def test__run_efibootmgr(self, mock_execute, mock_dispatch):
|
||||
mock_execute.return_value = ('', '')
|
||||
result = image._run_efibootmgr(['EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI'],
|
||||
self.fake_dev,
|
||||
self.fake_efi_system_part,
|
||||
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
fixes:
|
||||
- |
|
||||
Fixes cases where duplicates may not be found in the UEFI
|
||||
firmware NVRAM boot entry table by explicitly looking for, and deleting
|
||||
for matching labels in advance of creating the EFI boot loader entry.
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user