From 91f520356d7d7ea0c81b0b81eaca08e2fced6591 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: cid <afonnepaulc@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 13:58:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Doc: Fix incorrect function in example code

The referenced bug looks mostly fixed. This patch is basically
closing it.

Closes-Bug: #2039072
Change-Id: I22b80f2c995c365e9f19c3a06c80656cb6ce8922
---
 doc/source/contributor/hardware_managers.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/source/contributor/hardware_managers.rst b/doc/source/contributor/hardware_managers.rst
index e1b15fabb..4a7a7b07e 100644
--- a/doc/source/contributor/hardware_managers.rst
+++ b/doc/source/contributor/hardware_managers.rst
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ the user requested order is what is utilized.
 
 .. code-block:: python
 
-    def get_deploy_steps(self, node, ports):
+    def get_service_steps(self, node, ports):
         return [
             {
                 # A function on the custom hardware manager