ed791d9778
Due to a regression in lshw introduced by https://github.com/lyonel/lshw/pull/60, there are some versions in the wild that do not return sizes for memory banks <32GiB. In those cases, work around the problem by looking at the top-level size (if available) to find the total size. Previously we assumed that we only needed the top-level size when there was no list of memory banks. The issue is fixed upstream by https://github.com/lyonel/lshw/pull/65, but the erroneous patch is still present in the lshw-B.02.19.2-5.el8 package in CentOS 8.4 and 8.5. Change-Id: I6eb5981d28b9ae368239af0c1d0ec32ff79d95b3 Story: #2008865 Task: 42395
10 lines
459 B
YAML
10 lines
459 B
YAML
---
|
|
fixes:
|
|
- |
|
|
The lshw package version B.02.19.2-5 on CentOS 8.4 and 8.5 contains a `bug
|
|
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955250>`_ that prevents the
|
|
size of individual memory banks from being reported, with the result that
|
|
the total memory size would be reported as 0 in some places. The total
|
|
memory size is now taken from lshw's total memory size output (which does
|
|
not suffer from the same problem) when available.
|