Allow configuring IPMI cipher suite
Negotiation fails for some hardware, let's allow an explicit setting.
Change-Id: I04a3391f85412dcabc6105bd91beb1da25bdfc19
(cherry picked from commit 2773c5fb25
)
This commit is contained in:
parent
145d68e8f5
commit
ac2d4c086b
@ -168,6 +168,28 @@ protocol version::
|
||||
Version *1.5* of the IPMI protocol does not support encryption.
|
||||
Therefore, it is highly recommended that version 2.0 is used.
|
||||
|
||||
Cipher suites
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
IPMI 2.0 introduces support for encryption and allows setting which cipher
|
||||
suite to use. Traditionally, ``ipmitool`` was using cipher suite 3 by default,
|
||||
but since SHA1 no longer complies with modern security requirement, recent
|
||||
versions (e.g. the one used in RHEL 8.2) are switching to suite 17.
|
||||
|
||||
Normally, the cipher suite to use is negotiated with the BMC using the special
|
||||
command. On some hardware the negotiation yields incorrect results and IPMI
|
||||
commands fail with
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
Error in open session response message : no matching cipher suite
|
||||
Error: Unable to establish IPMI v2 / RMCP+ session
|
||||
|
||||
Another possible problem is ``ipmitool`` commands taking very long (tens of
|
||||
seconds or even minutes) because the BMC does not support cipher suite
|
||||
negotiation. In both cases you can specify the required suite yourself, e.g.::
|
||||
|
||||
openstack baremetal node set <UUID or name> --driver-info ipmi_cipher_suite=3
|
||||
|
||||
Static boot order configuration
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -109,6 +109,11 @@ OPTIONAL_PROPERTIES = {
|
||||
'[ipmi]disable_boot_timeout will be '
|
||||
'used if this option is not set. '
|
||||
'Optional.'),
|
||||
'ipmi_cipher_suite': _('The number of a cipher suite to use. Only 3 '
|
||||
'(AES-128 with SHA1) or 17 (AES-128 with SHA256) '
|
||||
'should ever be used; 17 is preferred. The '
|
||||
'default value depends on the ipmitool version, '
|
||||
'some recent versions have switched from 3 to 17.'),
|
||||
}
|
||||
COMMON_PROPERTIES = REQUIRED_PROPERTIES.copy()
|
||||
COMMON_PROPERTIES.update(OPTIONAL_PROPERTIES)
|
||||
@ -298,6 +303,7 @@ def _parse_driver_info(node):
|
||||
target_address = info.get('ipmi_target_address')
|
||||
protocol_version = str(info.get('ipmi_protocol_version', '2.0'))
|
||||
force_boot_device = info.get('ipmi_force_boot_device', False)
|
||||
cipher_suite = info.get('ipmi_cipher_suite')
|
||||
|
||||
if not username:
|
||||
LOG.warning('ipmi_username is not defined or empty for node %s: '
|
||||
@ -370,6 +376,16 @@ def _parse_driver_info(node):
|
||||
raise exception.InvalidParameterValue(_(
|
||||
"Number of ipmi_hex_kg_key characters is not even"))
|
||||
|
||||
if cipher_suite is not None:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
int(cipher_suite)
|
||||
except (TypeError, ValueError):
|
||||
raise exception.InvalidParameterValue(_(
|
||||
"Invalid cipher suite %s, expected a number") % cipher_suite)
|
||||
if protocol_version == '1.5':
|
||||
raise exception.InvalidParameterValue(_(
|
||||
"Cipher suites cannot be used with IPMI 1.5"))
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
'address': address,
|
||||
'dest_port': dest_port,
|
||||
@ -386,6 +402,7 @@ def _parse_driver_info(node):
|
||||
'target_address': target_address,
|
||||
'protocol_version': protocol_version,
|
||||
'force_boot_device': force_boot_device,
|
||||
'cipher_suite': cipher_suite,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -425,17 +442,13 @@ def _get_ipmitool_args(driver_info, pw_file=None):
|
||||
'-L', driver_info['priv_level']
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
if driver_info['dest_port']:
|
||||
args.append('-p')
|
||||
args.append(driver_info['dest_port'])
|
||||
|
||||
if driver_info['username']:
|
||||
args.append('-U')
|
||||
args.append(driver_info['username'])
|
||||
|
||||
if driver_info['hex_kg_key']:
|
||||
args.append('-y')
|
||||
args.append(driver_info['hex_kg_key'])
|
||||
for field, arg in [('dest_port', '-p'),
|
||||
('username', '-U'),
|
||||
('hex_kg_key', '-y'),
|
||||
('cipher_suite', '-C')]:
|
||||
if driver_info[field]:
|
||||
args.append(arg)
|
||||
args.append(driver_info[field])
|
||||
|
||||
for name, option in BRIDGING_OPTIONS:
|
||||
if driver_info[name] is not None:
|
||||
|
@ -5639,7 +5639,8 @@ class ManagerTestProperties(mgr_utils.ServiceSetUpMixin, db_base.DbTestCase):
|
||||
'force_persistent_boot_device', 'ipmi_protocol_version',
|
||||
'ipmi_force_boot_device', 'deploy_forces_oob_reboot',
|
||||
'rescue_kernel', 'rescue_ramdisk',
|
||||
'ipmi_disable_boot_timeout', 'ipmi_hex_kg_key']
|
||||
'ipmi_disable_boot_timeout', 'ipmi_hex_kg_key',
|
||||
'ipmi_cipher_suite']
|
||||
self._check_driver_properties("ipmi", expected)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_driver_properties_snmp(self):
|
||||
|
@ -807,6 +807,28 @@ class IPMIToolPrivateMethodTestCase(
|
||||
ret = ipmi._parse_driver_info(node)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(623, ret['dest_port'])
|
||||
|
||||
def test__parse_driver_info_ipmi_cipher_suite(self):
|
||||
info = dict(INFO_DICT)
|
||||
info['ipmi_cipher_suite'] = 0 # absolute power!
|
||||
node = obj_utils.get_test_node(self.context, driver_info=info)
|
||||
ret = ipmi._parse_driver_info(node)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(0, ret['cipher_suite'])
|
||||
|
||||
def test__parse_driver_info_ipmi_cipher_suite_not_a_number(self):
|
||||
info = dict(INFO_DICT)
|
||||
info['ipmi_cipher_suite'] = 'I can haz accez'
|
||||
node = obj_utils.get_test_node(self.context, driver_info=info)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(exception.InvalidParameterValue,
|
||||
ipmi._parse_driver_info, node)
|
||||
|
||||
def test__parse_driver_info_ipmi_cipher_suite_ipmi_1_5(self):
|
||||
info = dict(INFO_DICT)
|
||||
info['ipmi_cipher_suite'] = 0
|
||||
info['ipmi_protocol_version'] = '1.5'
|
||||
node = obj_utils.get_test_node(self.context, driver_info=info)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(exception.InvalidParameterValue,
|
||||
ipmi._parse_driver_info, node)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(ipmi.LOG, 'warning', spec_set=True, autospec=True)
|
||||
def test__parse_driver_info_undefined_credentials(self, mock_log):
|
||||
info = dict(INFO_DICT)
|
||||
@ -1360,6 +1382,33 @@ class IPMIToolPrivateMethodTestCase(
|
||||
mock_exec.assert_called_once_with(*args)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self.mock_sleep.called)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(ipmi, '_is_option_supported', autospec=True)
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(ipmi, '_make_password_file', _make_password_file_stub)
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(utils, 'execute', autospec=True)
|
||||
def test__exec_ipmitool_cipher_suite(self, mock_exec, mock_support):
|
||||
self.info['cipher_suite'] = '3'
|
||||
ipmi.LAST_CMD_TIME = {}
|
||||
args = [
|
||||
'ipmitool',
|
||||
'-I', 'lanplus',
|
||||
'-H', self.info['address'],
|
||||
'-L', self.info['priv_level'],
|
||||
'-U', self.info['username'],
|
||||
'-C', '3',
|
||||
'-v',
|
||||
'-f', awesome_password_filename,
|
||||
'A', 'B', 'C',
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
mock_support.return_value = False
|
||||
mock_exec.return_value = (None, None)
|
||||
|
||||
ipmi._exec_ipmitool(self.info, 'A B C')
|
||||
|
||||
mock_support.assert_called_once_with('timing')
|
||||
mock_exec.assert_called_once_with(*args)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self.mock_sleep.called)
|
||||
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(ipmi, '_is_option_supported', autospec=True)
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(ipmi, '_make_password_file', _make_password_file_stub)
|
||||
@mock.patch.object(utils, 'execute', autospec=True)
|
||||
|
18
releasenotes/notes/ipmi-cipher-suite-499097740f7c86ee.yaml
Normal file
18
releasenotes/notes/ipmi-cipher-suite-499097740f7c86ee.yaml
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
fixes:
|
||||
- |
|
||||
Allows configuring IPMI cipher suite via the new ``driver_info``
|
||||
parameter ``ipmi_cipher_suite`` to enable operators to navigate
|
||||
``ipmitool`` behavior changes around supported ciphers.
|
||||
issues:
|
||||
- Some ``ipmitool`` builds, in particular on machines running
|
||||
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2, have changed the default cipher suite
|
||||
being offered which can cause ``ipmitool`` to completely fail to
|
||||
negotiate a connection with the BMC. Operators who encounter this
|
||||
situation should use the ``ipmi_cipher_suite`` parameter in the
|
||||
``driver_info`` field to override and directly assert the required
|
||||
cipher. Because of potential security implications of attempting
|
||||
second level auto-negotiation and known BMC vendor behaviors,
|
||||
this must be identified by the operator and explicitly set as
|
||||
logic to attempt to navigate through situations like this may
|
||||
have undesirable results.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user