Revert change 438035 is_admin_project default
This change reverts having is_admin_project default to False [0] since we currently need to have it revert to True in order to account for anyone who has not configured an admin project. This will be truely fixed at a later date. This also adds comments from another change [1] which clarifies the for why this should not be changed at this moment. [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438035/ [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/257636/ Partial-Bug: 968696 Change-Id: I039bfc8a41d43634ebad545725b9188a82afb990 Co-Authored-By: Adam Young <ayoung@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: Matthew Edmonds <edmondsw@us.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6e00d3c94d
commit
4a82ab9065
@ -192,10 +192,15 @@ class KeystoneToken(dict):
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def is_admin_project(self):
|
||||
# Prevent domain scoped tokens from acting as is_admin_project
|
||||
if self.domain_scoped:
|
||||
# Currently, domain scoped tokens cannot act as is_admin_project
|
||||
return False
|
||||
return self.get('is_admin_project', False)
|
||||
# TODO(ayoung/edmondsw): Having is_admin_project default to True is
|
||||
# essential for fixing bug #968696. If an admin project is not
|
||||
# configured, we can add checks for is_admin_project:True and not
|
||||
# block anyone that hasn't configured an admin_project. Do not change
|
||||
# this until we can assume admin_project is actually set
|
||||
return self.get('is_admin_project', True)
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def trust_id(self):
|
||||
|
@ -87,8 +87,8 @@ class TestKeystoneTokenModel(core.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(token_data.scoped)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(token_data.trust_scoped)
|
||||
|
||||
# by default admin project is False for project scoped tokens
|
||||
self.assertFalse(token_data.is_admin_project)
|
||||
# by default admin project is True for project scoped tokens
|
||||
self.assertTrue(token_data.is_admin_project)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
[r['id'] for r in self.v3_sample_token['token']['roles']],
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user