Merge "Add documentation for auto-provisioning"

This commit is contained in:
Jenkins 2017-01-20 01:49:39 +00:00 committed by Gerrit Code Review
commit bc8a145de1

View File

@ -603,6 +603,155 @@ global username mapping.
]
}
Auto-Provisioning
-----------------
The mapping engine has the ability to aid in the auto-provisioning of resources
when a federated user authenticates for the first time. This can be achieved
using a specific mapping syntax that the mapping engine can parse and
ultimately make decisions on.
For example, consider the following mapping:
.. code-block:: javascript
{
"rules": [
{
"local": [
{
"user": {
"name": "{0}"
}
},
{
"projects": [
{
"name": "Production",
"roles": [
{
"name": "observer"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Staging",
"roles": [
{
"name": "member"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Project for {0}",
"roles": [
{
"name": "admin"
}
]
}
]
}
],
"remote": [
{
"type": "UserName"
}
]
}
]
}
The ``remote`` section of the mapping is relatively straight-forward. The main
difference between this mapping and the other examples is the addition of a
``projects`` section within the ``local`` rules. The ``projects`` list supplies
a list of projects that the federated user will be given access to. This is
achieved when a user has successfully authenticated and the mapping engine has
applied values from the assertion and mapped them into the ``local`` rules. In
the above example, an authenticated federated user will be granted the
``observer`` role on the ``Production`` project, ``member`` role on the
``Staging`` project, and they will have ``admin`` role on the ``Project for
jsmith``.
It is important to note the following constraints apply when auto-provisioning:
* Projects are the only resource that will be created dynamically.
* Projects will be created within the domain associated with the Identity
Provider.
* The ``projects`` section of the mapping must also contain a ``roles``
section.
+ Roles within the project must already exist in the deployment or domain.
Since the creation of roles typically requires policy changes across other
services in the deployment, it is expected that roles are created ahead of
time. Federated authentication should also be considered idempotent if the
attributes from the SAML assertion have not changed. In the example from above,
if the user's name is still ``jsmith``, then no new projects will be
created as a result of authentication.
Mappings can be created that mix ``groups`` and ``projects`` within the
``local`` section. The mapping shown in the example above does not contain a
``groups`` section in the ``local`` rules. This will result in the federated
user having direct role assignments on the projects in the ``projects`` list.
The following example contains ``local`` rules comprised of both ``projects``
and ``groups``, which allow for direct role assignments and group memberships.
.. code-block:: javascript
{
"rules": [
{
"local": [
{
"user": {
"name": "{0}"
}
},
{
"projects": [
{
"name": "Marketing",
"roles": [
{
"name": "member"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Development project for {0}",
"roles": [
{
"name": "admin"
}
]
}
]
},
{
"group": {
"name": "Finance",
"domain": {
"id": "6fe767"
}
}
}
],
"remote": [
{
"type": "UserName"
}
]
}
]
}
In the above example, a federated user will receive direct role assignments on
the ``Marketing`` project, as well as a dedicated project specific to the
federated user's name. In addition to that, they will also be placed in the
``Finance`` group and receive all role assignments that group has on projects
and domains.
Keystone to Keystone
--------------------