Cleanup a few auth_token comments
It is not only memcached cases where revocations need to be checked, so this cleans up an old comment that was no longer giving the full picture on that. It also corrects a couple other nit grammatical issues for better clarity. Change-Id: I51e51d2127c79b11b206e1459f3e83957bf44128
This commit is contained in:
parent
62805857ea
commit
c9447dbab2
@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ class _BaseAuthProtocol(object):
|
||||
|
||||
:raises exc.InvalidToken: if token is rejected
|
||||
"""
|
||||
# 0 seconds of validity means is it valid right now.
|
||||
# 0 seconds of validity means it is invalid right now
|
||||
if auth_ref.will_expire_soon(stale_duration=0):
|
||||
raise exc.InvalidToken(_('Token authorization failed'))
|
||||
|
||||
@ -838,9 +838,8 @@ class AuthProtocol(_BaseAuthProtocol):
|
||||
data = cached
|
||||
|
||||
if self._check_revocations_for_cached:
|
||||
# A token stored in Memcached might have been revoked
|
||||
# regardless of initial mechanism used to validate it,
|
||||
# and needs to be checked.
|
||||
# A token might have been revoked, regardless of initial
|
||||
# mechanism used to validate it, and needs to be checked.
|
||||
self._revocations.check(token_hashes)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
data = self._validate_offline(token, token_hashes)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user