openstack/manila
Code Issues Proposed changes

Fix access rules for managed shares in HSP driver

Browse Source 
A share managed in HSP could have some access rules that
are not in Manila. Trying to add a rule that already exists
in backend results in an error. Also, rules in backend that
names are not "share_id + ip" can't be deleted.
Additionally, if this share has a rule only in backend and not in
Manila, trying to delete it would fail, because HSP doesn't allow
delete share when it still has rules.

Fix it by adding a check in update access when rules already
exist in backend. Check for access rule name in backend when
denying access. And cleaning all rules from backend before
deleting a share to ensure that it has no children in HSP.

Change-Id: I0c8ee5c47efe22f004692022dd952f301d669b06
Closes-Bug: #1620756
This commit is contained in:
Alyson Rosa 2016-09-06 16:00:29 -03:00
parent 7a16eb685b
commit b29a0e553f
5 changed files with 201 additions and 31 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

54
manila/share/drivers/hitachi/hsp/driver.py
View File

@ -139,6 +139,19 @@ class HitachiHSPDriver(driver.ShareDriver):
{'shr': share['id']})
if hsp_share_id:
# Clean all rules from share before deleting it
current_rules = self.hsp.get_access_rules(hsp_share_id)
for rule in current_rules:
try:
self.hsp.delete_access_rule(hsp_share_id,
rule['name'])
except exception.HSPBackendException as e:
if 'No matching access rule found.' in e.msg:
LOG.debug("Rule %(rule)s already deleted in "
"backend.", {'rule': rule['name']})
else:
raise
self.hsp.delete_share(hsp_share_id)
if filesystem_id:
@ -188,7 +201,8 @@ class HitachiHSPDriver(driver.ShareDriver):
add_rules = self._get_complement(manila_rules_dict, hsp_rules_dict)
for rule in remove_rules:
self.hsp.delete_access_rule(hsp_share_id, rule[0])
rule_name = self._get_hsp_rule_name(hsp_share_id, rule[0])
self.hsp.delete_access_rule(hsp_share_id, rule_name)
for rule in add_rules:
self.hsp.add_access_rule(hsp_share_id, rule[0], rule[1])
@ -196,20 +210,50 @@ class HitachiHSPDriver(driver.ShareDriver):
for rule in delete_rules:
if rule['access_type'].lower() != 'ip':
continue
self.hsp.delete_access_rule(hsp_share_id, rule['access_to'])
# get the real rule name in HSP
rule_name = self._get_hsp_rule_name(hsp_share_id,
rule['access_to'])
try:
self.hsp.delete_access_rule(hsp_share_id,
rule_name)
except exception.HSPBackendException as e:
if 'No matching access rule found.' in e.msg:
LOG.debug("Rule %(rule)s already deleted in "
"backend.", {'rule': rule['access_to']})
else:
raise
for rule in add_rules:
if rule['access_type'].lower() != 'ip':
msg = _("Only IP access type currently supported.")
raise exception.InvalidShareAccess(reason=msg)
self.hsp.add_access_rule(
hsp_share_id, rule['access_to'],
(rule['access_level'] == constants.ACCESS_LEVEL_RW))
try:
self.hsp.add_access_rule(
hsp_share_id, rule['access_to'],
(rule['access_level'] == constants.ACCESS_LEVEL_RW))
except exception.HSPBackendException as e:
if 'Duplicate NFS access rule exists' in e.msg:
LOG.debug("Rule %(rule)s already exists in "
"backend.", {'rule': rule['access_to']})
else:
raise
LOG.debug("Successfully updated share %(shr)s rules.",
{'shr': share['id']})
def _get_hsp_rule_name(self, share_id, host_to):
rule_name = share_id + host_to
all_rules = self.hsp.get_access_rules(share_id)
for rule in all_rules:
# check if this rule has other name in HSP
if rule['host-specification'] == host_to:
rule_name = rule['name']
break
return rule_name
def _get_complement(self, rules_a, rules_b):
"""Returns the rules of list A that are not on list B"""
complement = []

12
manila/share/drivers/hitachi/hsp/rest.py
View File

@ -161,11 +161,11 @@ class HSPRestBackend(object):
self._send_post(url, payload=json.dumps(payload))
def delete_access_rule(self, share_id, host_to):
def delete_access_rule(self, share_id, rule_name):
url = "https://%s/hspapi/shares/%s/" % (self.host, share_id)
payload = {
"action": "delete-access-rule",
"name": share_id + host_to,
"name": rule_name,
}
self._send_post(url, payload=json.dumps(payload))
@ -198,9 +198,11 @@ class HSPRestBackend(object):
status = resp_json['properties']['completion-status']
if status == 'ERROR':
msg = _("HSP job %s failed.")
args = resp_json['id']
raise exception.HSPBackendException(msg=msg % args)
msg = _("HSP job %(id)s failed. %(reason)s")
job_id = resp_json['id']
reason = resp_json['properties']['completion-details']
raise exception.HSPBackendException(msg=msg % {'id': job_id,
'reason': reason})
elif status != target_status:
msg = _("Timeout while waiting for job %s to complete.")
args = resp_json['id']

146
manila/tests/share/drivers/hitachi/hsp/test_driver.py
View File

@ -61,7 +61,9 @@ class HitachiHSPTestCase(test.TestCase):
self._driver.backend_name = "HSP"
self.mock_log = self.mock_object(driver, 'LOG')
def test_update_access_add(self):
@ddt.data(None, exception.HSPBackendException(
message="Duplicate NFS access rule exists."))
def test_update_access_add(self, add_rule):
access = {
'access_type': 'ip',
'access_to': '172.24.10.10',
@ -74,7 +76,8 @@ class HitachiHSPTestCase(test.TestCase):
mock.Mock(return_value=fakes.file_system))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_share",
mock.Mock(return_value=fakes.share))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "add_access_rule", mock.Mock())
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "add_access_rule", mock.Mock(
side_effect=add_rule))
self._driver.update_access('context', self.fake_share_instance, [],
access_list, [])
@ -89,6 +92,36 @@ class HitachiHSPTestCase(test.TestCase):
fakes.share['id'], access['access_to'],
(access['access_level'] == constants.ACCESS_LEVEL_RW))
def test_update_access_add_exception(self):
access = {
'access_type': 'ip',
'access_to': '172.24.10.10',
'access_level': 'rw',
}
access_list = [access]
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_file_system",
mock.Mock(return_value=fakes.file_system))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_share",
mock.Mock(return_value=fakes.share))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "add_access_rule",
mock.Mock(side_effect=exception.HSPBackendException(
message="HSP Backend Exception: error adding "
"rule.")))
self.assertRaises(exception.HSPBackendException,
self._driver.update_access, 'context',
self.fake_share_instance, [], access_list, [])
rest.HSPRestBackend.get_file_system.assert_called_once_with(
self.fake_share_instance['id'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.get_share.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.file_system['id'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.add_access_rule.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.share['id'], access['access_to'],
(access['access_level'] == constants.ACCESS_LEVEL_RW))
def test_update_access_recovery(self):
access1 = {
'access_type': 'ip',
@ -108,7 +141,7 @@ class HitachiHSPTestCase(test.TestCase):
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_share",
mock.Mock(return_value=fakes.share))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_access_rules",
mock.Mock(return_value=fakes.hsp_rules))
mock.Mock(side_effect=[fakes.hsp_rules, []]))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "delete_access_rule")
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "add_access_rule")
@ -121,16 +154,56 @@ class HitachiHSPTestCase(test.TestCase):
self.fake_share_instance['id'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.get_share.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.file_system['id'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.get_access_rules.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.share['id'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.get_access_rules.assert_has_calls([
mock.call(fakes.share['id'])])
rest.HSPRestBackend.delete_access_rule.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.share['id'], fakes.hsp_rules[0]['host-specification'])
fakes.share['id'],
fakes.share['id'] + fakes.hsp_rules[0]['host-specification'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.add_access_rule.assert_has_calls([
mock.call(fakes.share['id'], access1['access_to'], True),
mock.call(fakes.share['id'], access2['access_to'], False)
], any_order=True)
def test_update_access_delete(self):
@ddt.data(None, exception.HSPBackendException(
message="No matching access rule found."))
def test_update_access_delete(self, delete_rule):
access1 = {
'access_type': 'ip',
'access_to': '172.24.44.200',
'access_level': 'rw',
}
access2 = {
'access_type': 'something',
'access_to': '188.100.20.10',
'access_level': 'ro',
}
delete_rules = [access1, access2]
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_file_system",
mock.Mock(return_value=fakes.file_system))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_share",
mock.Mock(return_value=fakes.share))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "delete_access_rule",
mock.Mock(side_effect=delete_rule))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_access_rules",
mock.Mock(return_value=fakes.hsp_rules))
self._driver.update_access('context', self.fake_share_instance, [], [],
delete_rules)
self.assertTrue(self.mock_log.debug.called)
rest.HSPRestBackend.get_file_system.assert_called_once_with(
self.fake_share_instance['id'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.get_share.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.file_system['id'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.delete_access_rule.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.share['id'], fakes.hsp_rules[0]['name'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.get_access_rules.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.share['id'])
def test_update_access_delete_exception(self):
access1 = {
'access_type': 'ip',
'access_to': '172.24.10.10',
@ -149,10 +222,15 @@ class HitachiHSPTestCase(test.TestCase):
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_share",
mock.Mock(return_value=fakes.share))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "delete_access_rule",
mock.Mock())
mock.Mock(side_effect=exception.HSPBackendException(
message="HSP Backend Exception: error deleting "
"rule.")))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, 'get_access_rules',
mock.Mock(return_value=[]))
self._driver.update_access('context', self.fake_share_instance, [], [],
delete_rules)
self.assertRaises(exception.HSPBackendException,
self._driver.update_access, 'context',
self.fake_share_instance, [], [], delete_rules)
self.assertTrue(self.mock_log.debug.called)
@ -161,7 +239,9 @@ class HitachiHSPTestCase(test.TestCase):
rest.HSPRestBackend.get_share.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.file_system['id'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.delete_access_rule.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.share['id'], delete_rules[0]['access_to'])
fakes.share['id'], fakes.share['id'] + access1['access_to'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.get_access_rules.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.share['id'])
@ddt.data(True, False)
def test_update_access_ip_exception(self, is_recovery):
@ -260,14 +340,20 @@ class HitachiHSPTestCase(test.TestCase):
self._driver.create_share, 'context',
fakes.invalid_share)
def test_delete_share(self):
@ddt.data(None, exception.HSPBackendException(
message="No matching access rule found."))
def test_delete_share(self, delete_rule):
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_file_system",
mock.Mock(return_value=fakes.file_system))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_share",
mock.Mock(return_value=fakes.share))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "delete_share", mock.Mock())
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "delete_file_system",
mock.Mock())
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "delete_share")
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "delete_file_system")
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_access_rules",
mock.Mock(return_value=[fakes.hsp_rules[0]]))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "delete_access_rule", mock.Mock(
side_effect=[exception.HSPBackendException(
message="No matching access rule found."), delete_rule]))
self._driver.delete_share('context', self.fake_share_instance)
@ -281,6 +367,36 @@ class HitachiHSPTestCase(test.TestCase):
fakes.share['id'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.delete_file_system.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.file_system['id'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.get_access_rules.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.share['id'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.delete_access_rule.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.share['id'], fakes.hsp_rules[0]['name'])
def test_delete_share_rule_exception(self):
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_file_system",
mock.Mock(return_value=fakes.file_system))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_share",
mock.Mock(return_value=fakes.share))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_access_rules",
mock.Mock(return_value=[fakes.hsp_rules[0]]))
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "delete_access_rule",
mock.Mock(side_effect=exception.HSPBackendException(
message="Internal Server Error.")))
self.assertRaises(exception.HSPBackendException,
self._driver.delete_share, 'context',
self.fake_share_instance)
self.assertTrue(self.mock_log.debug.called)
rest.HSPRestBackend.get_file_system.assert_called_once_with(
self.fake_share_instance['id'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.get_share.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.file_system['id'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.get_access_rules.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.share['id'])
rest.HSPRestBackend.delete_access_rule.assert_called_once_with(
fakes.share['id'], fakes.hsp_rules[0]['name'])
def test_delete_share_already_deleted(self):
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "get_file_system", mock.Mock(

14
manila/tests/share/drivers/hitachi/hsp/test_rest.py
View File

@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ class HitachiHSPRestTestCase(test.TestCase):
def test_delete_share(self):
url = "https://172.24.47.190/hspapi/shares/%s" % fakes.share['id']
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "_send_delete", mock.Mock())
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "_send_delete")
self._driver.delete_share(fakes.share['id'])
@ -265,13 +265,12 @@ class HitachiHSPRestTestCase(test.TestCase):
url = "https://172.24.47.190/hspapi/shares/%s/" % fakes.share['id']
payload = {
"action": "delete-access-rule",
"name": fakes.share['id'] + fakes.access_rule['access_to'],
"name": fakes.hsp_rules[0]['name'],
}
self.mock_object(rest.HSPRestBackend, "_send_post", mock.Mock())
self._driver.delete_access_rule(fakes.share['id'],
fakes.access_rule['access_to'])
fakes.hsp_rules[0]['name'])
rest.HSPRestBackend._send_post.assert_called_once_with(
url, payload=json.dumps(payload))
@ -314,10 +313,13 @@ class HitachiHSPRestTestCase(test.TestCase):
url = "fake_job_url"
json = {
'id': 'fake_id',
'properties': {'completion-status': stat},
'properties': {
'completion-details': 'Duplicate NFS access rule exists',
'completion-status': stat,
},
'messages': [{
'id': 'fake_id',
'message': 'fake_msg'
'message': 'fake_msg',
}]
}

6
releasenotes/notes/rules-for-managed-share-f28a26ffc980f6fb.yaml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
---
fixes:
- Fixed HSP driver not supporting adding rules
that exist in backend for managed shares.
- Fixed HSP driver not supporting deleting share if
it has rules in backend that are not in Manila.