Dropping lower constraints testing
We facing errors related to the new pip resolver, this topic was discussed on the ML and QA team proposed to to test lower-constraints [1]. I propose to drop this test because the complexity and recurring pain needed to maintain that now exceeds the benefits provided by this mechanismes. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019390.html Change-Id: Iccaf7cfb8051ec1b01fde0786489855013297703
This commit is contained in:
parent
adb30bd63e
commit
83b2d7ec4e
@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
|
||||
- project:
|
||||
templates:
|
||||
- check-requirements
|
||||
- openstack-lower-constraints-jobs
|
||||
- openstack-python3-wallaby-jobs
|
||||
- publish-openstack-docs-pti
|
||||
- release-notes-jobs-python3
|
||||
|
@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
|
||||
alabaster==0.7.10
|
||||
appdirs==1.3.0
|
||||
Babel==2.3.4
|
||||
coverage==4.0
|
||||
debtcollector==1.2.0
|
||||
docutils==0.11
|
||||
doc8==0.6.0
|
||||
dulwich==0.15.0
|
||||
eventlet==0.20.0
|
||||
extras==1.0.0
|
||||
fixtures==3.0.0
|
||||
flake8==2.5.5
|
||||
hacking==0.12.0
|
||||
imagesize==0.7.1
|
||||
iso8601==0.1.11
|
||||
Jinja2==2.10
|
||||
keystoneauth1==3.4.0
|
||||
linecache2==1.0.0
|
||||
MarkupSafe==1.0
|
||||
mccabe==0.2.1
|
||||
monotonic==0.6
|
||||
mox3==0.20.0
|
||||
msgpack-python==0.4.0
|
||||
netaddr==0.7.18
|
||||
netifaces==0.10.4
|
||||
os-client-config==1.28.0
|
||||
oslo.i18n==3.15.3
|
||||
oslo.log==3.36.0
|
||||
oslo.serialization==2.21.1
|
||||
oslo.utils==3.33.0
|
||||
oslotest==3.2.0
|
||||
pbr==2.0.0
|
||||
pep8==1.5.7
|
||||
pyflakes==0.8.1
|
||||
Pygments==2.2.0
|
||||
pyparsing==2.1.0
|
||||
python-mimeparse==1.6.0
|
||||
python-subunit==1.0.0
|
||||
pytz==2013.6
|
||||
PyYAML==3.12
|
||||
requests==2.18.0
|
||||
requestsexceptions==1.2.0
|
||||
snowballstemmer==1.2.1
|
||||
stestr==2.0.0
|
||||
stevedore==1.20.0
|
||||
testrepository==0.0.18
|
||||
testtools==2.2.0
|
||||
traceback2==1.4.0
|
||||
unittest2==1.1.0
|
||||
wrapt==1.7.0
|
||||
yaql==1.1.3 # Apache 2.0 License
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user