From b8ca03dc97ef64851faaab2ac59e47cdab4d8073 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gecong1973 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:56:55 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Add __ne__ built-in function In Python 3 __ne__ by default delegates to __eq__ and inverts the result, but in Python 2 they urge you to define __ne__ when you define __eq__ for it to work properly [1].There are no implied relationships among the comparison operators. The truth of x==y does not imply that x!=y is false. Accordingly, when defining __eq__(), one should also define __ne__() so that the operators will behave as expected. [1]https://docs.python.org/2/reference/datamodel.html#object.__ne__ Change-Id: I966baba62d906f7521c4e31e37c87ccd5dd3054c --- monasca_notification/notification.py | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/monasca_notification/notification.py b/monasca_notification/notification.py index 4e88611..1a8b705 100644 --- a/monasca_notification/notification.py +++ b/monasca_notification/notification.py @@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ class Notification(object): return True + def __ne__(self, other): + return not self.__eq__(other) + def to_json(self): """Return json representation """