Update patch set 3

Patch Set 3: I would prefer that you didn't merge this

(1 inline comment)

This is very close Nachi! Once more small wording change and a fixup of a > 80 character line.

One note: I don't think this can merge now until we merge a spec since it won't pass the Jenkins job ... due to no spec being in there! If that's a problem, I'll propose a patch with a fake temporary spec to get Jenkins to pass and remove it later.

Patch-set: 3
Label: Code-Review=-1
Label: Workflow=0

4f0c0e2c0c775c1a62385866879a1b7ada0a4d96

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+{
+  "comments": [
+    {
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "AAAAXH//uwI\u003d",
+        "filename": "specs/template.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 3
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 36,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 105
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2014-04-17T21:01:50Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "Can you reformulate this to break at 80 lines instead of a single string as it is now? Also, slight wording change. Can you change \"But\" to \"However,\"? Notice the comma as well.",
+      "revId": "4f0c0e2c0c775c1a62385866879a1b7ada0a4d96",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
+      "unresolved": false
+    }
+  ]
+}