Update patch set 12

Patch Set 12: Code-Review-1 Workflow-1

(2 comments)

Patch-set: 12
Reviewer: Gerrit User 4694 <4694@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543>
Label: Code-Review=-1
Label: Workflow=-1
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 4694 \u003c4694@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_4694\u003e replied on the change"}

e92e1872a59ea50ecc7c2ed535bdfdfb08595f2f

@@ -1,5 +1,22 @@
 {
   "comments": [
+    {
+      "unresolved": false,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "23fff4e2_697ac1a9",
+        "filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
+        "patchSetId": 12
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 0,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 4694
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2022-07-29T21:29:45Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "Given the path that the conversation about supporting this use case has taken on the Nova side, we should put this spec on hold, with the understanding that the most likely scenario is that it will not be needed. Please see my comments in-line",
+      "revId": "e92e1872a59ea50ecc7c2ed535bdfdfb08595f2f",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
+    },
     {
       "unresolved": true,
       "key": {
@@ -34,6 +51,29 @@
       "revId": "e92e1872a59ea50ecc7c2ed535bdfdfb08595f2f",
       "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
     },
+    {
+      "unresolved": true,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "b9718915_cb78d6a2",
+        "filename": "specs/zed/support-dns-subdomains-at-a-network-level.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 12
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 70,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 4694
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2022-07-29T21:29:45Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "We have been working on this spec under the explicit assumption (see lines highlighted) that it will be complemented on the Nova side by this spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/840974. However, recently the Nova team has decided to address the use case in a manner that doesn\u0027t require any cooperation from Neutron. They came up with a spec (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/849765) that went from original submission to approval in matter of a five days and then they reverted it, due to opposition within their core team. Currently, they are planning to discuss again how to address the use case in the Antelope cycle with this spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/850352. Still, the proposed alternatives don\u0027t require cooperation from Neutron.\n\nAs a consequence, we should put this spec on hold. Let\u0027s watch the conversation on the Nova side during the Antelope cycle, in the unlikely case that something might be needed from Neutron.",
+      "range": {
+        "startLine": 67,
+        "startChar": 5,
+        "endLine": 70,
+        "endChar": 20
+      },
+      "revId": "e92e1872a59ea50ecc7c2ed535bdfdfb08595f2f",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
+    },
     {
       "unresolved": true,
       "key": {