Ocata: Assessment for networking-bgpvpn
Change-Id: I9d88b2b2a0274e505b627a5100dda79dbbd43187
This commit is contained in:
Armando Migliaccio
parent
a9ed0c48bc
commit
7f0170ec26
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
|
|||
..
|
||||
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
|
||||
License.
|
||||
|
||||
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode
|
||||
|
||||
===========================
|
||||
Networking-bgpvpn Scorecard
|
||||
===========================
|
||||
|
||||
Neutron integration
|
||||
-------------------
|
||||
|
||||
.. _N0:
|
||||
|
||||
* N0. Does the project use the Neutron REST API or relies on proprietary backends?
|
||||
|
||||
No. The project provides an API and Framework to interconnect BGP/MPLS VPNs to
|
||||
Openstack Neutron networks, routers and ports. It represents the server-side
|
||||
(plus its client-side mappings) to provide such a functionality. The server-side
|
||||
provides a driver-based mechanism to supply implementations of the API, which
|
||||
include an agent-based solution as available by the related project
|
||||
networking-bagpipe, as well as OpenDaylight and OpenContrail.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _N1:
|
||||
|
||||
* N1. Does the project integrate/use neutron-lib?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes. So far the import ratio is ~15%. The neutron-lib periodic integration is
|
||||
available with periodic-networking-bgpvpn-py27-with-neutron-lib-master, though
|
||||
the switch to py35 has happened recently, so the project should switch too.
|
||||
|
||||
* https://review.openstack.org/#/c/377738/
|
||||
|
||||
.. _N2:
|
||||
|
||||
* N2. Do project members actively contribute to help neutron-lib achieve its
|
||||
goal?
|
||||
|
||||
No evidence of that.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _N3:
|
||||
|
||||
* N3. Do project members collaborate with the core team to enable subprojects
|
||||
to loosely integrate with the Neutron core platform by helping with the definition
|
||||
of modular interfaces?
|
||||
|
||||
Team memembers have been particularly active in reviewing patches affecting
|
||||
the OVS pipeline.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _N4:
|
||||
|
||||
* N4. How does the project provide networking services? Does it use modular interfaces
|
||||
as provided by the core platform?
|
||||
|
||||
The project adopts a service plugin model to plug into the API framework and provide
|
||||
driver extensions a la' ML2 pattern. The decomposition between bgpvpn and bagpipe
|
||||
especially in relation to where the L2 agent extension is located may need some
|
||||
rethinking.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _N5:
|
||||
|
||||
* N5. If the project provides new API extensions, have API extensions been discussed
|
||||
and accepted by the Neutron drivers team? Please provide links to API specs, if
|
||||
required.
|
||||
|
||||
No.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
|
||||
.. _D1:
|
||||
|
||||
* D1. Does the project have a doc tox target, functional and continuously
|
||||
working? Provide proof (links to logs.openstack.org).
|
||||
|
||||
Yes.
|
||||
|
||||
* https://github.com/openstack/networking-bgpvpn/blob/master/tox.ini
|
||||
|
||||
.. _D2:
|
||||
|
||||
* D2. If the project provide API extensions, does the project have an
|
||||
api-ref tox target, functional and continously working? Provide proof
|
||||
(links to logs.openstack.org).
|
||||
|
||||
No. There is some API documentation but it is not in the required format.
|
||||
|
||||
* https://review.openstack.org/#/c/390196/
|
||||
|
||||
.. _D3:
|
||||
|
||||
* D3. Does the project have a releasenotes tox target, functional and
|
||||
continously working? Provide proof.
|
||||
|
||||
Yes.
|
||||
|
||||
* http://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/networking-bgpvpn/
|
||||
* https://github.com/openstack/networking-bgpvpn/blob/master/tox.ini
|
||||
|
||||
.. _D4:
|
||||
|
||||
* D4. Describe the types of documentation available: developer, end user,
|
||||
administrator, deployer.
|
||||
|
||||
There is developer, and user documentation available.
|
||||
|
||||
* http://docs.openstack.org/developer/networking-bgpvpn/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Continuous Integration
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
|
||||
.. _C1:
|
||||
|
||||
* C1. Does the project have a Grafana dashboard showing historical trends of
|
||||
all the jobs available? Provide proof (links to grafana.openstack.org).
|
||||
|
||||
No.
|
||||
|
||||
* https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385335/
|
||||
|
||||
.. _C2:
|
||||
|
||||
* C2. Does the project have CI for unit coverage? Provide proof (links to
|
||||
logs.openstack.org)
|
||||
|
||||
Yes.
|
||||
|
||||
* http://status.openstack.org/openstack-health/#/g/project/openstack~2Fnetworking-bgpvpn
|
||||
|
||||
.. _C3:
|
||||
|
||||
* C3. Does the project have CI for functional coverage? If so, does it include
|
||||
DB migration and sync validation?
|
||||
|
||||
There is functional coverage, but it is experimental. DB migration and sync
|
||||
validation is provided via unit testing.
|
||||
|
||||
* http://status.openstack.org/openstack-health/#/g/project/openstack~2Fnetworking-bgpvpn
|
||||
|
||||
.. _C4:
|
||||
|
||||
* C4. Does the project have CI for fullstack coverage?
|
||||
|
||||
No.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _C5:
|
||||
|
||||
* C5. Does the project have CI for Tempest coverage? If so, specify nature
|
||||
(API and/or Scenario).
|
||||
|
||||
Only API tests available.
|
||||
|
||||
* https://github.com/openstack/networking-bgpvpn/tree/master/networking_bgpvpn_tempest/tests
|
||||
|
||||
.. _C6:
|
||||
|
||||
* C6. How does a project validate upgrades on a continuous basis? Does
|
||||
the project require or support CI for Grenade coverage?
|
||||
|
||||
No Grenade testing is available.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _C7:
|
||||
|
||||
* C7. Does the project provide multinode CI?
|
||||
|
||||
No.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _C8:
|
||||
|
||||
* C8. Does the project support Python 3.x? Provide proof.
|
||||
|
||||
Yes.
|
||||
|
||||
* http://logs.openstack.org/85/387885/16/experimental/gate-networking-bgpvpn-python35-db/5459830/testr_results.html.gz
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Release footprint
|
||||
-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
.. _R1:
|
||||
|
||||
* R1. Does the project adopt semver?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _R2:
|
||||
|
||||
* R2. Does the project have release deliverables? Provide proof as available
|
||||
in the `release repo <http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/releases/tree/>`_.
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, though the project notes do not seem to show up.
|
||||
|
||||
* https://releases.openstack.org/newton/index.html
|
||||
* https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/deliverables/_independent/networking-bgpvpn.yaml
|
||||
|
||||
.. _R3:
|
||||
|
||||
* R3. Does the project use upper-constraints?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes.
|
||||
|
||||
* https://github.com/openstack/networking-bgpvpn/blob/master/tox.ini#L8
|
||||
|
||||
.. _R4:
|
||||
|
||||
* Does the project integrate with OpenStack Proposal Bot for requirements updates?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes.
|
||||
|
||||
* https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391505/
|
||||
|
||||
Stable backports
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
.. _S1:
|
||||
|
||||
* S1. Does the project have stable branches and/or tags? Provide history of
|
||||
backports.
|
||||
|
||||
Yes. Stable liberty, mitaka and newton look aligned with Neutron's
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Client library
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
.. _L1:
|
||||
|
||||
* L1. If the project requires a client library, how does it implement CLI and
|
||||
API bindings?
|
||||
|
||||
There are client mappings but no OSC transition yet.
|
||||
|
||||
* https://review.openstack.org/#/c/388870/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Scorecard
|
||||
---------
|
||||
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| Scorecard |
|
||||
+===============+
|
||||
| N0_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| N1_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| N2_ | N |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| N3_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| N4_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| N5_ | N |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| D1_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| D2_ | N |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| D3_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| D4_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| C1_ | N |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| C2_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| C3_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| C4_ | N |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| C5_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| C6_ | N |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| C7_ | N |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| C8_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| R1_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| R2_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| R3_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| R4_ | Y |
|
||||
+---------------+
|
||||
| S1_ | Y |
|
||||
+-----+---------+
|
||||
| L1_ | N |
|
||||
+-----+---------+
|
||||
|
||||
Final remarks: There are some gaps that need attention most notably API
|
||||
documentation, client mappings and functional/scenario testing.
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue