neutron-specs/c9a9703febc0f67e23536af4233...

72 lines
2.3 KiB
Plaintext

{
"comments": [
{
"unresolved": false,
"key": {
"uuid": "d9c5129b_ca28733d",
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
"patchSetId": 4
},
"lineNbr": 0,
"author": {
"id": 9708
},
"writtenOn": "2022-11-02T13:34:37Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "I have some questions",
"revId": "c9a9703febc0f67e23536af42331483c85fb137e",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "b7fad626_390c7a3a",
"filename": "specs/2023.1/strict-minimum-bandwidth-tunnelled-networks.rst",
"patchSetId": 4
},
"lineNbr": 46,
"author": {
"id": 9708
},
"writtenOn": "2022-11-02T13:34:37Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "Is it always true that the tunneled traffic uses one single host interface on a given host?",
"revId": "c9a9703febc0f67e23536af42331483c85fb137e",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "e9abce30_4d291c77",
"filename": "specs/2023.1/strict-minimum-bandwidth-tunnelled-networks.rst",
"patchSetId": 4
},
"lineNbr": 94,
"author": {
"id": 9708
},
"writtenOn": "2022-11-02T13:34:37Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "could you add an example how the port.resource_request will look like for such a tunnneled port with QoS min bw?",
"revId": "c9a9703febc0f67e23536af42331483c85fb137e",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "a7b18f5c_3d80c99b",
"filename": "specs/2023.1/strict-minimum-bandwidth-tunnelled-networks.rst",
"patchSetId": 4
},
"lineNbr": 95,
"author": {
"id": 9708
},
"writtenOn": "2022-11-02T13:34:37Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "Did neutron rejected tunnelled ports with QoS min bw before? \nIf yes, then we can remove such limitation after this implementation. \nIf no, then we can have tunneled ports with QoS min bw that are missing resource allocation in placement and we have to create a solution that healing such missing allocations.",
"revId": "c9a9703febc0f67e23536af42331483c85fb137e",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
}
]
}