Fix some grammatical errors in TESTING.rst
TrivialFix. Change-Id: I1a0c2b2da9d6ae0a52028420a98f5ae17e8d6855
This commit is contained in:
parent
cb577fc862
commit
d5c3361753
|
@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ One such method creates a virtual device in a namespace,
|
|||
and ensures that both the namespace and the device are cleaned up at the
|
||||
end of the test run regardless of success or failure using the 'addCleanup'
|
||||
method. The test generates details for a temporary device, asserts that
|
||||
a device by that name does not exist, create that device, asserts that
|
||||
a device by that name does not exist, creates that device, asserts that
|
||||
it now exists, deletes it, and asserts that it no longer exists.
|
||||
Such a test avoids all three issues mentioned above if it were written
|
||||
using the unit testing framework.
|
||||
|
@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ using the unit testing framework.
|
|||
Functional tests are also used to target larger scope, such as agents.
|
||||
Many good examples exist: See the OVS, L3 and DHCP agents functional tests.
|
||||
Such tests target a top level agent method and assert that the system
|
||||
interaction that was supposed to be perform was indeed performed.
|
||||
interaction that was supposed to be performed was indeed performed.
|
||||
For example, to test the DHCP agent's top level method that accepts network
|
||||
attributes and configures dnsmasq for that network, the test:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue