Brian Haley 4350ed3c35 Better handle ports in security groups ...

After taking a closer look at bug 1818385, I found a couple
of follow-on things to fix in the security group code.

First, there are very few protocols that accept ports,
especially via iptables.  For this reason I think it's
acceptable that the API rejects them as invalid.

Second, UDPlite has some interesting support in iptables.  It
does not support using --dport directly, but does using
'-m multiport --dports 123', and also supports port ranges using
'-m multiport --dports 123:124'.  Added code for this special
case.

Change-Id: Ifb2e6bb6c7a2e2987ba95040ef5a98ed50aa36d4
Closes-Bug: #1818385

2019-03-15 13:54:33 -04:00

..

__init__.py

Update License Headers to replace Nicira with VMware

2014-02-27 08:11:15 +00:00

_deprecate.py

Fix flake8 N534 untranslated exception message

2018-10-19 15:46:04 -04:00

cache_utils.py

Remove deprecated cache_url

2017-11-10 00:47:19 -05:00

config.py

remove neutron.common.rpc

2019-02-06 11:05:55 -07:00

constants.py

Better handle ports in security groups

2019-03-15 13:54:33 -04:00

eventlet_utils.py

Windows: fix exec calls

2018-02-01 17:05:28 +02:00

ipv6_utils.py

Allow Ipv6 addresses for nova_metadata_host

2018-10-11 02:07:05 +00:00

profiler.py

Make code follow log translation guideline

2017-08-14 02:01:48 +00:00

test_lib.py

Revert "Removed test_lib module"

2015-06-29 08:27:41 +00:00

utils.py

Remove redundant event listening logic from neutron/db/api

2019-02-09 12:58:37 -05:00