Brian Haley 4350ed3c35 Better handle ports in security groups ... After taking a closer look at bug 1818385, I found a couple of follow-on things to fix in the security group code. First, there are very few protocols that accept ports, especially via iptables. For this reason I think it's acceptable that the API rejects them as invalid. Second, UDPlite has some interesting support in iptables. It does not support using --dport directly, but does using '-m multiport --dports 123', and also supports port ranges using '-m multiport --dports 123:124'. Added code for this special case. Change-Id: Ifb2e6bb6c7a2e2987ba95040ef5a98ed50aa36d4 Closes-Bug: #1818385		2019-03-15 13:54:33 -04:00
..
__init__.py	Update License Headers to replace Nicira with VMware	2014-02-27 08:11:15 +00:00
_deprecate.py	Fix flake8 N534 untranslated exception message	2018-10-19 15:46:04 -04:00
cache_utils.py	Remove deprecated cache_url	2017-11-10 00:47:19 -05:00
config.py	remove neutron.common.rpc	2019-02-06 11:05:55 -07:00
constants.py	Better handle ports in security groups	2019-03-15 13:54:33 -04:00
eventlet_utils.py	Windows: fix exec calls	2018-02-01 17:05:28 +02:00
ipv6_utils.py	Allow Ipv6 addresses for nova_metadata_host	2018-10-11 02:07:05 +00:00
profiler.py	Make code follow log translation guideline	2017-08-14 02:01:48 +00:00
test_lib.py	Revert "Removed test_lib module"	2015-06-29 08:27:41 +00:00
utils.py	Remove redundant event listening logic from neutron/db/api	2019-02-09 12:58:37 -05:00