Consolidate the APIs for getting consoles
We have different public API for getting console access for each kind of console that is supported in Nova. The proposal is to consolidate all these APIs into one. Previously-approved: kilo APIImpact blueprint consolidate-console-api Change-Id: I14daca240d5a7b41c1ce75a0240dce3421845128
This commit is contained in:
152
specs/liberty/approved/consolidate-console-api.rst
Normal file
152
specs/liberty/approved/consolidate-console-api.rst
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
|
||||
..
|
||||
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
|
||||
License.
|
||||
|
||||
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode
|
||||
|
||||
==========================================
|
||||
Consolidate the APIs for getting consoles
|
||||
==========================================
|
||||
|
||||
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/consolidate-console-api
|
||||
|
||||
We have different public API for getting console access for each kind of
|
||||
console that is supported in Nova. The proposal is to consolidate all these
|
||||
APIs into one.
|
||||
|
||||
Problem description
|
||||
===================
|
||||
|
||||
The APIs for getting console access are tightly coupled with the name of the
|
||||
underlying protocol: os-getVNCConsole, os-getRDPConsole, etc. The result is
|
||||
that every time we want to add support for a new console, we need to introduce
|
||||
a new public API. A far better solution is to have only one API, get_console,
|
||||
which can be used for obtaining access to all types of consoles.
|
||||
|
||||
Use Cases
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
As a Nova developer I want to add support for a new console type and I don't
|
||||
want to add more clutter to the public API.
|
||||
|
||||
Project Priority
|
||||
-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Proposed change
|
||||
===============
|
||||
|
||||
The proposal is to introduce a single public API for getting console access and
|
||||
deprecate all of the current public APIs that we have. The implementation will
|
||||
inspect the request and will call the relevant get_XXX_console of the
|
||||
ComputeManager.
|
||||
|
||||
Alternatives
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
The alternative is to keep adding public APIs for each new console type which
|
||||
is not really desired.
|
||||
|
||||
Data model impact
|
||||
-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
REST API impact
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
||||
The new API will be exposed with API microversion and will have the following
|
||||
definition:
|
||||
|
||||
Request::
|
||||
|
||||
POST /servers/<uuid>/console
|
||||
{
|
||||
"protocol": ["vnc"|"rdp"|"serial"|"spice"],
|
||||
"type": ["novnc"|"xpvnc"|"rdp-html5"|"spice-html5"|"serial"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
The 'type' parameter in the request is optional and should be used when the
|
||||
chosen protocol supports multiple connection types.
|
||||
|
||||
Response::
|
||||
|
||||
200 OK
|
||||
{
|
||||
"url": string,
|
||||
"protocol": ["vnc"|"rdp"|"serial"|"spice"],
|
||||
"type": ["novnc"|"xpvnc"|"rdp-html5"|"spice-html5"|"serial"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Some of failure scenarios and their corresponding error code include:
|
||||
* wrong values for protocol/type in the request - "400 Bad Request"
|
||||
* the instance is not yet ready - "409 Conflict"
|
||||
* the virt driver doesn't support this console type - "501 Not Implemented"
|
||||
|
||||
Security impact
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Notifications impact
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Other end user impact
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
There will be a new 'console-get' subcommand for the Nova CLI that will support
|
||||
all of the console types.
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Other deployer impact
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Developer impact
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Implementation
|
||||
==============
|
||||
|
||||
Assignee(s)
|
||||
-----------
|
||||
|
||||
Primary assignee:
|
||||
rgerganov
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
There is already a patch which implements the blueprint which didn't land in
|
||||
Kilo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148509/
|
||||
|
||||
Dependencies
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Testing
|
||||
=======
|
||||
|
||||
A new test will be added to tempest which will exercise the new API.
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
The new API should be documented and we should encourage users to use this
|
||||
instead of the old APIs which will be deprecated.
|
||||
|
||||
References
|
||||
==========
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user