The 'hw:numa_mempolicy' parameter was never implemented and will likely
never be, however, it's located in the 'implemented' folder suggesting
otherwise. Seeing as specs are as much a reference as anything, this
invalid information should not be retained. Correct this, taking the
opportunity to fix some other typo, line wrapping and general
The NUMA work did not integrate with the extensible resource
tracker since it was not suitable at the time.
The memory property values should be recorded in MB rather
than in GB.
As discussed at our nova meetings, reorganize the juno specs into
- proposed: things proposed which weren't approved
- approved: things we approved but didn't implement
- implemented: things approved and implemented
The first I suspect is the most controversial. I've done this
because I worry about the case where a future developer wants to
pick up something dropped by a previous developer, but has trouble
finding previous proposed specifications on the topic. Note that
the actual proposed specs for Juno are adding in a later commit.