Replace http with https for doc links in nova
Update doc links according to OpenStack document migration, Use https instead of http for docs links, and update. Change-Id: Ia4c58ffd799444b939175603bdf511622def75cc
This commit is contained in:
parent
dce9e93bfc
commit
582d16e51b
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Public Contractual APIs
|
||||
Although nova has many internal APIs, they are not all public contractual
|
||||
APIs. Below is a link of our public contractual APIs:
|
||||
|
||||
* http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/
|
||||
* https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/
|
||||
|
||||
Anything not in this list is considered private, not to be used outside of
|
||||
nova, and should not be considered stable.
|
||||
@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ As a patch author, you should try to offset the reviewer resources
|
||||
spent on your patch by reviewing other patches. If no one does this, the review
|
||||
team (cores and otherwise) become spread too thin.
|
||||
|
||||
For review guidelines see: http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#peer-review
|
||||
For review guidelines see: https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#peer-review
|
||||
|
||||
Reverts for Retrospective Vetos
|
||||
===============================
|
||||
@ -127,6 +127,6 @@ replacement, the deprecation is open-ended, but serves as a signal that new
|
||||
deployments should not rely on the metrics that Nova gathers and should instead
|
||||
focus their efforts on alternative solutions for placement.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _Ceilometer: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ceilometer/
|
||||
.. _Watcher: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/watcher/
|
||||
.. _Ceilometer: https://docs.openstack.org/ceilometer/latest/
|
||||
.. _Watcher: https://docs.openstack.org/watcher/latest/
|
||||
.. _Newton midcycle: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-August/100600.html
|
||||
|
@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ OpenStack Wide Patterns
|
||||
Nova follows most of the generally adopted norms for OpenStack projects.
|
||||
You can get more details here:
|
||||
|
||||
* http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html
|
||||
* http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/
|
||||
* https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html
|
||||
* https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/
|
||||
|
||||
If you are new to Nova, please read this first: :ref:`getting_involved`.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ and packagers to perform tests (automated, and manual) on the release, to
|
||||
spot any major bugs.
|
||||
|
||||
The Nova release process is aligned with the `development cycle schedule
|
||||
<http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html#typical-development-cycle-schedule>`_
|
||||
<https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html#typical-development-cycle-schedule>`_
|
||||
used by many OpenStack projects, including the following steps.
|
||||
|
||||
- Feature Proposal Freeze
|
||||
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ implement. How do I make that happen?
|
||||
|
||||
You can get most of your questions answered here:
|
||||
|
||||
- http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html
|
||||
- https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html
|
||||
|
||||
But let's put a Nova specific twist on things...
|
||||
|
||||
@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ Where do you track bugs?
|
||||
|
||||
We track bugs here:
|
||||
|
||||
- http://bugs.launchpad.net/nova
|
||||
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova
|
||||
|
||||
If you fix an issue, please raise a bug so others who spot that issue
|
||||
can find the fix you kindly created for them.
|
||||
@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ When do I need a blueprint vs a spec?
|
||||
|
||||
For more details see:
|
||||
|
||||
- http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/blueprints.html
|
||||
- https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/blueprints.html
|
||||
|
||||
To understand this question, we need to understand why blueprints and
|
||||
specs are useful.
|
||||
@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ So you need your blueprint approved? Here is how:
|
||||
review in that meeting.
|
||||
|
||||
- if you need a spec, then please submit a nova-spec for review, see:
|
||||
http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html
|
||||
https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html
|
||||
|
||||
Got any more questions? Contact johnthetubaguy or one of the other
|
||||
nova-specs-core who are awake at the same time as you. IRC is best as
|
||||
@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ Interoperable API, supporting a vibrant ecosystem
|
||||
|
||||
An interoperable API that gives users on-demand access to compute
|
||||
resources is at the heart of Nova's mission:
|
||||
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/project_scope.html#mission
|
||||
https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/project-scope.html#mission
|
||||
|
||||
Nova has a vibrant ecosystem of tools built on top of the current Nova
|
||||
API. All features should be designed to work with all technology
|
||||
@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ Feature Classification
|
||||
|
||||
This is a look at moving forward this effort:
|
||||
|
||||
- http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/support-matrix.html
|
||||
- https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/support-matrix.html
|
||||
|
||||
The things we need to cover:
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user