Enable booting of libvirt guests with AMD SEV memory encryption

Track compute node inventory for the new MEM_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT
resource class (added in os-resource-classes 0.4.0) which represents
the number of guests a compute node can host concurrently with memory
encrypted at the hardware level.

This serves as a "master switch" for enabling SEV functionality, since
all the code which takes advantage of the presence of this inventory
in order to boot SEV-enabled guests is already in place, but none of
it gets used until the inventory is non-zero.

A discrete inventory is required because on AMD SEV-capable hardware,
the memory controller has a fixed number of slots for holding
encryption keys, one per guest.  Typical early hardware only has 15
slots, thereby limiting the number of SEV guests which can be run
concurrently to 15.  nova needs to track how many slots are available
and used in order to avoid attempting to exceed that limit in the
hardware.

Work is in progress to allow QEMU and libvirt to expose the number of
slots available on SEV hardware; however until this is finished and
released, it will not be possible for nova to programatically detect
the correct value with which to populate the MEM_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT
inventory.  So as a stop-gap, populate the inventory using the value
manually provided by the cloud operator in a new configuration option
CONF.libvirt.num_memory_encrypted_guests.

Since this commit effectively enables SEV, also add all the relevant
documentation as planned in the AMD SEV spec[0]:

- Add operation.boot-encrypted-vm to the KVM hypervisor feature matrix.

- Update the KVM section of the Configuration Guide.

- Update the flavors section of the User Guide.

- Add a release note.

[0] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/train/approved/amd-sev-libvirt-support.html#documentation-impact

blueprint: amd-sev-libvirt-support
Change-Id: I659cb77f12a38a4d2fb118530ebb9de88d2ed30d
This commit is contained in:
Adam Spiers 2019-06-20 16:28:16 +01:00 committed by Stephen Finucane
parent 84db8b3f3d
commit 8e5d6767bb
8 changed files with 529 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -469,6 +469,262 @@ See `the KVM documentation
<https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Nested_Guests#Limitations>`_ for more
information on these limitations.
.. _amd-sev:
AMD SEV (Secure Encrypted Virtualization)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
`Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV)`__ is a technology from AMD which
enables the memory for a VM to be encrypted with a key unique to the VM.
SEV is particularly applicable to cloud computing since it can reduce the
amount of trust VMs need to place in the hypervisor and administrator of
their host system.
__ https://developer.amd.com/sev/
Nova supports SEV from the Train release onwards.
Requirements for SEV
--------------------
First the operator will need to ensure the following prerequisites are met:
- SEV-capable AMD hardware as Nova compute hosts
- An appropriately configured software stack on those compute hosts,
so that the various layers are all SEV ready:
- kernel >= 4.16
- QEMU >= 2.12
- libvirt >= 4.5
- ovmf >= commit 75b7aa9528bd 2018-07-06
.. _deploying-sev-capable-infrastructure:
Deploying SEV-capable infrastructure
------------------------------------
In order for users to be able to use SEV, the operator will need to
perform the following steps:
- Configure the :oslo.config:option:`libvirt.num_memory_encrypted_guests`
option in :file:`nova.conf` to represent the number of guests an SEV
compute node can host concurrently with memory encrypted at the
hardware level. For example:
.. code-block:: ini
[libvirt]
num_memory_encrypted_guests = 15
Initially this is required because on AMD SEV-capable hardware, the
memory controller has a fixed number of slots for holding encryption
keys, one per guest. For example, at the time of writing, earlier
generations of hardware only have 15 slots, thereby limiting the
number of SEV guests which can be run concurrently to 15. Nova
needs to track how many slots are available and used in order to
avoid attempting to exceed that limit in the hardware.
At the time of writing (September 2019), work is in progress to allow
QEMU and libvirt to expose the number of slots available on SEV
hardware; however until this is finished and released, it will not be
possible for Nova to programatically detect the correct value. So this
configuration option serves as a stop-gap, allowing the cloud operator
to provide this value manually.
- Ensure that sufficient memory is reserved on the SEV compute hosts
for host-level services to function correctly at all times. This is
particularly important when hosting SEV-enabled guests, since they
pin pages in RAM, preventing any memory overcommit which may be in
normal operation on other compute hosts.
It is `recommended`__ to achieve this by configuring an ``rlimit`` at
the ``/machine.slice`` top-level ``cgroup`` on the host, with all VMs
placed inside that. (For extreme detail, see `this discussion on the
spec`__.)
__ http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/train/approved/amd-sev-libvirt-support.html#memory-reservation-solutions
__ https://review.opendev.org/#/c/641994/2/specs/train/approved/amd-sev-libvirt-support.rst@167
An alternative approach is to configure the
:oslo.config:option:`reserved_host_memory_mb` option in the
``[compute]`` section of :file:`nova.conf`, based on the expected
maximum number of SEV guests simultaneously running on the host, and
the details provided in `an earlier version of the AMD SEV spec`__
regarding memory region sizes, which cover how to calculate it
correctly.
__ https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/stein/approved/amd-sev-libvirt-support.html#proposed-change
See `the Memory Locking and Accounting section of the AMD SEV spec`__
and `previous discussion for further details`__.
__ http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/train/approved/amd-sev-libvirt-support.html#memory-locking-and-accounting
__ https://review.opendev.org/#/c/641994/2/specs/train/approved/amd-sev-libvirt-support.rst@167
- A cloud administrator will need to define one or more SEV-enabled
flavors :ref:`as described in the user guide
<extra-specs-memory-encryption>`, unless it is sufficient for users
to define SEV-enabled images.
Additionally the cloud operator should consider the following optional
step:
- Configure :oslo.config:option:`libvirt.hw_machine_type` on all
SEV-capable compute hosts to include ``x86_64=q35``, so that all
x86_64 images use the ``q35`` machine type by default. (Currently
Nova defaults to the ``pc`` machine type for the ``x86_64``
architecture, although `it is expected that this will change in the
future`__.)
Changing the default from ``pc`` to ``q35`` makes the creation and
configuration of images by users more convenient by removing the
need for the ``hw_machine_type`` property to be set to ``q35`` on
every image for which SEV booting is desired.
.. caution::
Consider carefully whether to set this option. It is
particularly important since a limitation of the implementation
prevents the user from receiving an error message with a helpful
explanation if they try to boot an SEV guest when neither this
configuration option nor the image property are set to select
a ``q35`` machine type.
On the other hand, setting it to ``q35`` may have other
undesirable side-effects on other images which were expecting to
be booted with ``pc``, so it is suggested to set it on a single
compute node or aggregate, and perform careful testing of typical
images before rolling out the setting to all SEV-capable compute
hosts.
__ https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1780138
Launching SEV instances
-----------------------
Once an operator has covered the above steps, users can launch SEV
instances either by requesting a flavor for which the operator set the
``hw:mem_encryption`` extra spec to ``True``, or by using an image
with the ``hw_mem_encryption`` property set to ``True``.
These do not inherently cause a preference for SEV-capable hardware,
but for now SEV is the only way of fulfilling the requirement for
memory encryption. However in the future, support for other
hardware-level guest memory encryption technology such as Intel MKTME
may be added. If a guest specifically needs to be booted using SEV
rather than any other memory encryption technology, it is possible to
ensure this by adding ``trait:HW_CPU_X86_AMD_SEV=required`` to the
flavor extra specs or image properties.
In all cases, SEV instances can only be booted from images which have
the ``hw_firmware_type`` property set to ``uefi``, and only when the
machine type is set to ``q35``. This can be set per image by setting
the image property ``hw_machine_type=q35``, or per compute node by
the operator via :oslo.config:option:`libvirt.hw_machine_type` as
explained above.
Impermanent limitations
-----------------------
The following limitations may be removed in the future as the
hardware, firmware, and various layers of software receive new
features:
- SEV-encrypted VMs cannot yet be live-migrated or suspended,
therefore they will need to be fully shut down before migrating off
an SEV host, e.g. if maintenance is required on the host.
- SEV-encrypted VMs cannot contain directly accessible host devices
(PCI passthrough). So for example mdev vGPU support will not
currently work. However technologies based on vhost-user should
work fine.
- The boot disk of SEV-encrypted VMs cannot be ``virtio-blk``. Using
``virtio-scsi`` or SATA for the boot disk works as expected, as does
``virtio-blk`` for non-boot disks.
- Operators will initially be required to manually specify the upper
limit of SEV guests for each compute host, via the new
:oslo.config:option:`libvirt.num_memory_encrypted_guests` configuration
option described above. This is a short-term workaround to the current
lack of mechanism for programmatically discovering the SEV guest limit
via libvirt.
This config option may later be demoted to a fallback value for
cases where the limit cannot be detected programmatically, or even
removed altogether when Nova's minimum QEMU version guarantees that
it can always be detected.
Permanent limitations
---------------------
The following limitations are expected long-term:
- The number of SEV guests allowed to run concurrently will always be
limited. `On the first generation of EPYC machines it will be
limited to 15 guests`__; however this limit becomes much higher with
the second generation (Rome).
__ https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2019-January/msg00652.html
- The operating system running in an encrypted virtual machine must
contain SEV support.
- The ``q35`` machine type does not provide an IDE controller,
therefore IDE devices are not supported. In particular this means
that Nova's libvirt driver's current default behaviour on the x86_64
architecture of attaching the config drive as an ``iso9660`` IDE
CD-ROM device will not work. There are two potential workarounds:
#. Change :oslo.config:option:`config_drive_format` in
:file:`nova.conf` from its default value of ``iso9660`` to ``vfat``.
This will result in ``virtio`` being used instead. However this
per-host setting could potentially break images with legacy OSes
which expect the config drive to be an IDE CD-ROM. It would also
not deal with other CD-ROM devices.
#. Set the (largely `undocumented
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1808868>`_)
``hw_cdrom_bus`` image property to ``virtio``, which is
recommended as a replacement for ``ide``, and ``hw_scsi_model``
to ``virtio-scsi``.
Some potentially cleaner long-term solutions which require code
changes have been suggested in the `Work Items section of the SEV
spec`__.
__ http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/train/approved/amd-sev-libvirt-support.html#work-items
Non-limitations
---------------
For the sake of eliminating any doubt, the following actions are *not*
expected to be limited when SEV encryption is used:
- Cold migration or shelve, since they power off the VM before the
operation at which point there is no encrypted memory (although this
could change since there is work underway to add support for `PMEM
<https://pmem.io/>`_)
- Snapshot, since it only snapshots the disk
- ``nova evacuate`` (despite the name, more akin to resurrection than
evacuation), since this is only initiated when the VM is no longer
running
- Attaching any volumes, as long as they do not require attaching via
an IDE bus
- Use of spice / VNC / serial / RDP consoles
- `VM guest virtual NUMA (a.k.a. vNUMA)
<https://www.suse.com/documentation/sles-12/singlehtml/article_vt_best_practices/article_vt_best_practices.html#sec.vt.best.perf.numa.vmguest>`_
For further technical details, see `the nova spec for SEV support`__.
__ http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/train/approved/amd-sev-libvirt-support.html
Guest agent support
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

View File

@ -538,6 +538,18 @@ NUMA topology
greater than the available number of CPUs or memory respectively, an
exception is raised.
.. _extra-specs-memory-encryption:
Hardware encryption of guest memory
If there are compute hosts which support encryption of guest memory
at the hardware level, this functionality can be requested via the
``hw:mem_encryption`` extra spec parameter:
.. code-block:: console
$ openstack flavor set FLAVOR-NAME \
--property hw:mem_encryption=True
.. _extra-specs-realtime-policy:
CPU real-time policy

View File

@ -1664,3 +1664,31 @@ driver.libvirt-vz-vm=missing
driver.libvirt-vz-ct=missing
driver.powervm=missing
driver.zvm=missing
[operation.boot-encrypted-vm]
title=Boot instance with secure encrypted memory
status=optional
notes=The feature allows VMs to be booted with their memory
hardware-encrypted with a key specific to the VM, to help
protect the data residing in the VM against access from anyone
other than the user of the VM. The Configuration and Security
Guides specify usage of this feature.
cli=openstack server create <usual server create parameters>
driver.xenserver=missing
driver.libvirt-kvm-x86=partial
driver-notes.libvirt-kvm-x86=This feature is currently only
available with hosts which support the SEV (Secure Encrypted
Virtualization) technology from AMD.
driver.libvirt-kvm-aarch64=missing
driver.libvirt-kvm-ppc64=missing
driver.libvirt-kvm-s390x=missing
driver.libvirt-qemu-x86=missing
driver.libvirt-lxc=missing
driver.libvirt-xen=missing
driver.vmware=missing
driver.hyperv=missing
driver.ironic=missing
driver.libvirt-vz-vm=missing
driver.libvirt-vz-ct=missing
driver.powervm=missing
driver.zvm=missing

View File

@ -718,10 +718,11 @@ http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/random.7.html.
help='For qemu or KVM guests, set this option to specify '
'a default machine type per host architecture. '
'You can find a list of supported machine types '
'in your environment by checking the output of '
'the "virsh capabilities" command. The format of the '
'value for this config option is host-arch=machine-type. '
'For example: x86_64=machinetype1,armv7l=machinetype2'),
'in your environment by checking the output of the '
':command:`virsh capabilities` command. The format of '
'the value for this config option is '
'``host-arch=machine-type``. For example: '
'``x86_64=machinetype1,armv7l=machinetype2``.'),
cfg.StrOpt('sysinfo_serial',
default='unique',
choices=(
@ -840,6 +841,57 @@ Related options:
* ``virt_type`` must be set to ``kvm`` or ``qemu``.
* ``ram_allocation_ratio`` must be set to 1.0.
"""),
cfg.IntOpt('num_memory_encrypted_guests',
default=None,
min=0,
help="""
Maximum number of guests with encrypted memory which can run
concurrently on this compute host.
For now this is only relevant for AMD machines which support SEV
(Secure Encrypted Virtualisation). Such machines have a limited
number of slots in their memory controller for storing encryption
keys. Each running guest with encrypted memory will consume one of
these slots.
The option may be reused for other equivalent technologies in the
future. If the machine does not support memory encryption, the option
will be ignored and inventory will be set to 0.
If the machine does support memory encryption, *for now* a value of
``None`` means an effectively unlimited inventory, i.e. no limit will
be imposed by Nova on the number of SEV guests which can be launched,
even though the underlying hardware will enforce its own limit.
However it is expected that in the future, auto-detection of the
inventory from the hardware will become possible, at which point
``None`` will cause auto-detection to automatically impose the correct
limit.
.. note::
When deciding whether to use the default of ``None`` or manually
impose a limit, operators should carefully weigh the benefits
vs. the risk. The benefits are a) immediate convenience since
nothing needs to be done now, and b) convenience later when
upgrading compute hosts to future versions of Nova, since again
nothing will need to be done for the correct limit to be
automatically imposed. However the risk is that until
auto-detection is implemented, users may be able to attempt to
launch guests with encrypted memory on hosts which have already
reached the maximum number of guests simultaneously running with
encrypted memory. This risk may be mitigated by other limitations
which operators can impose, for example if the smallest RAM
footprint of any flavor imposes a maximum number of simultaneously
running guests which is less than or equal to the SEV limit.
Related options:
* :oslo.config:option:`libvirt.virt_type` must be set to ``kvm``.
* It's recommended to consider including ``x86_64=q35`` in
:oslo.config:option:`libvirt.hw_machine_type`; see
:ref:`deploying-sev-capable-infrastructure` for more on this.
"""),
]

View File

@ -14,10 +14,12 @@
# under the License.
import mock
import os_resource_classes as orc
import os_traits as ost
from nova import conf
from nova.db import constants as db_const
from nova import test
from nova.tests.functional.libvirt import integrated_helpers
from nova.tests.unit.virt.libvirt import fakelibvirt
@ -30,6 +32,23 @@ class LibvirtReportTraitsTestBase(
integrated_helpers.LibvirtProviderUsageBaseTestCase):
pass
def assertMemEncryptionSlotsEqual(self, slots):
inventory = self._get_provider_inventory(self.host_uuid)
if slots == 0:
self.assertNotIn(orc.MEM_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT, inventory)
else:
self.assertEqual(
inventory[orc.MEM_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT],
{
'total': slots,
'min_unit': 1,
'max_unit': 1,
'step_size': 1,
'allocation_ratio': 1.0,
'reserved': 0,
}
)
class LibvirtReportTraitsTests(LibvirtReportTraitsTestBase):
def test_report_cpu_traits(self):
@ -77,6 +96,10 @@ class LibvirtReportNoSevTraitsTests(LibvirtReportTraitsTestBase):
Then test that if the SEV capability appears (again via
mocking), after a restart of the compute service, the trait
gets registered on the compute host.
Also test that on both occasions, the inventory of the
MEM_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT resource class on the compute host
corresponds to the absence or presence of the SEV capability.
"""
self.assertFalse(self.compute.driver._host.supports_amd_sev)
@ -88,6 +111,8 @@ class LibvirtReportNoSevTraitsTests(LibvirtReportTraitsTestBase):
traits = self._get_provider_traits(self.host_uuid)
self.assertNotIn(sev_trait, traits)
self.assertMemEncryptionSlotsEqual(0)
# Now simulate the host gaining SEV functionality. Here we
# simulate a kernel update or reconfiguration which causes the
# kvm-amd kernel module's "sev" parameter to become available
@ -121,6 +146,8 @@ class LibvirtReportNoSevTraitsTests(LibvirtReportTraitsTestBase):
# Sanity check that we've still got the trait globally.
self.assertIn(sev_trait, self._get_all_traits())
self.assertMemEncryptionSlotsEqual(db_const.MAX_INT)
class LibvirtReportSevTraitsTests(LibvirtReportTraitsTestBase):
STUB_INIT_HOST = False
@ -132,6 +159,7 @@ class LibvirtReportSevTraitsTests(LibvirtReportTraitsTestBase):
new=fakelibvirt.virConnect._domain_capability_features_with_SEV)
def setUp(self):
super(LibvirtReportSevTraitsTests, self).setUp()
self.flags(num_memory_encrypted_guests=16, group='libvirt')
self.start_compute()
def test_sev_trait_on_off(self):
@ -143,6 +171,10 @@ class LibvirtReportSevTraitsTests(LibvirtReportTraitsTestBase):
Then test that if the SEV capability disappears (again via
mocking), after a restart of the compute service, the trait
gets removed from the compute host.
Also test that on both occasions, the inventory of the
MEM_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT resource class on the compute host
corresponds to the absence or presence of the SEV capability.
"""
self.assertTrue(self.compute.driver._host.supports_amd_sev)
@ -154,6 +186,8 @@ class LibvirtReportSevTraitsTests(LibvirtReportTraitsTestBase):
traits = self._get_provider_traits(self.host_uuid)
self.assertIn(sev_trait, traits)
self.assertMemEncryptionSlotsEqual(16)
# Now simulate the host losing SEV functionality. Here we
# simulate a kernel downgrade or reconfiguration which causes
# the kvm-amd kernel module's "sev" parameter to become
@ -177,3 +211,5 @@ class LibvirtReportSevTraitsTests(LibvirtReportTraitsTestBase):
# Sanity check that we've still got the trait globally.
self.assertIn(sev_trait, self._get_all_traits())
self.assertMemEncryptionSlotsEqual(0)

View File

@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ from nova.compute import vm_states
import nova.conf
from nova import context
from nova.db import api as db
from nova.db import constants as db_const
from nova import exception
from nova.network import model as network_model
from nova import objects
@ -23679,3 +23680,69 @@ class TestLibvirtMultiattach(test.NoDBTestCase):
# calls = [mock.call(lv_ver=libvirt_driver.MIN_LIBVIRT_MULTIATTACH),
# mock.call(hv_ver=(2, 10, 0))]
# has_min_version.assert_has_calls(calls)
vc = fakelibvirt.virConnect
class TestLibvirtSEV(test.NoDBTestCase):
"""Libvirt driver tests for AMD SEV support."""
def setUp(self):
super(TestLibvirtSEV, self).setUp()
self.useFixture(fakelibvirt.FakeLibvirtFixture())
self.driver = libvirt_driver.LibvirtDriver(fake.FakeVirtAPI(), True)
@mock.patch.object(os.path, 'exists', new=mock.Mock(return_value=False))
class TestLibvirtSEVUnsupported(TestLibvirtSEV):
def test_get_mem_encrypted_slots_no_config(self):
self.driver._host._set_amd_sev_support()
self.assertEqual(0, self.driver._get_memory_encrypted_slots())
def test_get_mem_encrypted_slots_config_zero(self):
self.flags(num_memory_encrypted_guests=0, group='libvirt')
self.driver._host._set_amd_sev_support()
self.assertEqual(0, self.driver._get_memory_encrypted_slots())
@mock.patch.object(libvirt_driver.LOG, 'warning')
def test_get_mem_encrypted_slots_config_non_zero_unsupported(
self, mock_log):
self.flags(num_memory_encrypted_guests=16, group='libvirt')
self.driver._host._set_amd_sev_support()
# Still zero without mocked SEV support
self.assertEqual(0, self.driver._get_memory_encrypted_slots())
mock_log.assert_called_with(
'Host is configured with libvirt.num_memory_encrypted_guests '
'set to %d, but is not SEV-capable.', 16)
def test_get_mem_encrypted_slots_unsupported(self):
self.driver._host._set_amd_sev_support()
self.assertEqual(0, self.driver._get_memory_encrypted_slots())
@mock.patch.object(vc, '_domain_capability_features',
new=vc._domain_capability_features_with_SEV)
class TestLibvirtSEVSupported(TestLibvirtSEV):
"""Libvirt driver tests for when AMD SEV support is present."""
@test.patch_exists(SEV_KERNEL_PARAM_FILE, True)
@test.patch_open(SEV_KERNEL_PARAM_FILE, "1\n")
def test_get_mem_encrypted_slots_unlimited(self):
self.driver._host._set_amd_sev_support()
self.assertEqual(db_const.MAX_INT,
self.driver._get_memory_encrypted_slots())
@test.patch_exists(SEV_KERNEL_PARAM_FILE, True)
@test.patch_open(SEV_KERNEL_PARAM_FILE, "1\n")
def test_get_mem_encrypted_slots_config_non_zero_supported(self):
self.flags(num_memory_encrypted_guests=16, group='libvirt')
self.driver._host._set_amd_sev_support()
self.assertEqual(16, self.driver._get_memory_encrypted_slots())
@test.patch_exists(SEV_KERNEL_PARAM_FILE, True)
@test.patch_open(SEV_KERNEL_PARAM_FILE, "1\n")
@mock.patch.object(libvirt_driver.LOG, 'warning')
def test_get_mem_encrypted_slots_config_zero_supported(self, mock_log):
self.flags(num_memory_encrypted_guests=0, group='libvirt')
self.driver._host._set_amd_sev_support()
self.assertEqual(0, self.driver._get_memory_encrypted_slots())

View File

@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ from nova.console import serial as serial_console
from nova.console import type as ctype
from nova import context as nova_context
from nova import crypto
from nova.db import constants as db_const
from nova import exception
from nova.i18n import _
from nova import image
@ -6875,6 +6876,17 @@ class LibvirtDriver(driver.ComputeDriver):
},
}
memory_enc_slots = self._get_memory_encrypted_slots()
if memory_enc_slots > 0:
result[orc.MEM_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT] = {
'total': memory_enc_slots,
'min_unit': 1,
'max_unit': 1,
'step_size': 1,
'allocation_ratio': 1.0,
'reserved': 0,
}
# If a sharing DISK_GB provider exists in the provider tree, then our
# storage is shared, and we should not report the DISK_GB inventory in
# the compute node provider.
@ -6915,6 +6927,35 @@ class LibvirtDriver(driver.ComputeDriver):
# so that spawn() or other methods can access it thru a getter
self.provider_tree = copy.deepcopy(provider_tree)
def _get_memory_encrypted_slots(self):
slots = CONF.libvirt.num_memory_encrypted_guests
if not self._host.supports_amd_sev:
if slots and slots > 0:
LOG.warning("Host is configured with "
"libvirt.num_memory_encrypted_guests set to "
"%d, but is not SEV-capable.", slots)
return 0
# NOTE(aspiers): Auto-detection of the number of available
# slots for AMD SEV is not yet possible, so honor the
# configured value, or impose no limit if this is not
# specified. This does incur a risk that if operators don't
# read the instructions and configure the maximum correctly,
# the maximum could be exceeded resulting in SEV guests
# failing at launch-time. However at least SEV guests will
# launch until the maximum, and when auto-detection code is
# added later, an upgrade will magically fix the issue.
#
# Note also that the configured value can be 0 on an
# SEV-capable host, since there might conceivably be good
# reasons for the operator to want to disable SEV even when
# it's available (e.g. due to performance impact, or
# implementation bugs which may surface later).
if slots is not None:
return slots
else:
return db_const.MAX_INT
@staticmethod
def _is_reshape_needed_vgpu_on_root(provider_tree, nodename):
"""Determine if root RP has VGPU inventories.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
---
features:
- |
The libvirt driver can now support requests for guest RAM to be
encrypted at the hardware level, if there are compute hosts which
support it. Currently only AMD SEV (Secure Encrypted
Virtualization) is supported, and it has certain minimum version
requirements regarding the kernel, QEMU, and libvirt.
Memory encryption can be required either via flavor which has the
``hw:mem_encryption`` extra spec set to ``True``, or via an image
which has the ``hw_mem_encryption`` property set to ``True``.
These do not inherently cause a preference for SEV-capable
hardware, but for now SEV is the only way of fulfilling the
requirement. However in the future, support for other
hardware-level guest memory encryption technology such as Intel
MKTME may be added. If a guest specifically needs to be booted
using SEV rather than any other memory encryption technology, it
is possible to ensure this by adding
``trait:HW_CPU_X86_AMD_SEV=required`` to the flavor extra specs or
image properties.
In all cases, SEV instances can only be booted from images which
have the ``hw_firmware_type`` property set to ``uefi``, and only
when the machine type is set to ``q35``. This can be set per
image by setting the image property ``hw_machine_type=q35``, or
per compute node by the operator via the ``hw_machine_type``
configuration option in the ``[libvirt]`` section of
:file:`nova.conf`.
For information on how to set up support for AMD SEV, please see
the `KVM section of the Configuration Guide
<https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/configuration/hypervisor-kvm.html#amd-sev>`_.