The cross-cell resize code does not consider neutron ports with resource
request. To avoid migration failures this patch makes nova to fall back
to same cell resize if the instance has neutron ports with resource
request.
Change-Id: Icaad4b2375b491c8a7e87fb6f4977ae2e13e8190
Closes-Bug: #1907522
It turned out that during the qos resize work we did not implemented
support of cross cell resize with qos ports. Tempest test coverage for
the resize and migrate is landed recently that made the nova-multi-cell
job to fail.
So this patch disables the qos resize and migrate tempest tests for the
nova-multi-cell job to unblock the gate.
Related-Bug: #1907522
[1] I8c573c4a11a76932057d8415d76114a03269b9f3
Change-Id: I95bc22f7d65454cd9e7b54a0e6d9516f2f204978
Previous patches in the blueprint implemented the support for unshelve
with qos ports and added functional test coverage for the
various scenarios. So this patch changes the API check
that rejected such operation to check for the service version and therefore
conditionally enable the feature.
Change-Id: Iaf70ee41f1bfb1a4964da3f59cd3a0b4b5e20d36
blueprint: support-move-ops-with-qos-ports-ussuri
Previous patches in the blueprint implemented the support for live
migraton with qos ports and added functional test coverage for the
various live migration scenarios. So this patch removes the API check
that rejected such operation and document the new feature.
Change-Id: Ib9ef18fff28c463c9ffe3607d93428b689dc89fb
blueprint: support-move-ops-with-qos-ports-ussuri
Previous patch [1] implemented support for evacuation of servers with
neutron ports having resource request. So this patch removes the API
check that rejected such operations and document the new feature.
[1] Id9ed7a82d42be8ffe760f03e6610b9e6f5a4287b
Change-Id: Id5f2f4f22b856c989e2eef8ed56b9829d1bcefb6
blueprint: support-move-ops-with-qos-ports-ussuri
This patch adds functional coverage for such resize. No extra code
changes were needed on top of the migrate patches to make resize work.
Now that the nova code supports the resize this patch removes the
check from the API that rejected the operation.
Note that in the spec [1] we agreed not to introduce new microversion
for this change but treat it as a bugfix. The current change also makes
it possible to accept the resize of these servers with _any_
microversion.
[1] https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/train/approved/support-move-ops-with-qos-ports.html#rest-api-impact
blueprint: support-move-ops-with-qos-ports
Change-Id: Id0ee10e8d323786f4d79c82e3f05b48e76bd0956
Now that the nova code supports such a migration this patch removes the
check from the API that rejected the operation.
Note that in the spec [1] we agreed not to introduce new microversion
for this change but treat it as a bugfix. The current change also makes
it possible to accept the migration of these servers with _any_
microversion.
[1] https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/train/approved/support-move-ops-with-qos-ports.html#rest-api-impact
Change-Id: I4bda569cc7c247e83219276282724c77e760ddcd
blueprint: support-move-ops-with-qos-ports
