openstack/octavia
Code Issues Proposed changes

Merge "Handle undefined protocol field in security group rules correctly" into stable/2024.1

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Zuul 2024-11-20 20:49:58 +00:00 committed by Gerrit Code Review
commit 29a87ef767
3 changed files with 10 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
octavia/network/drivers/neutron/allowed_address_pairs.py
View File

@ -194,12 +194,13 @@ class AllowedAddressPairsDriver(neutron_base.BaseNeutronDriver):
# Don't remove egress rules and don't confuse other protocols with
# None ports with the egress rules. VRRP uses protocol 51 and 112
if (rule.get('direction') == 'egress' or
rule.get('protocol').upper() not in
rule.get('protocol') is None or
rule['protocol'].upper() not in
[constants.PROTOCOL_TCP, constants.PROTOCOL_UDP,
lib_consts.PROTOCOL_SCTP]):
continue
old_ports.append((rule.get('port_range_max'),
rule.get('protocol').lower(),
rule['protocol'].lower(),
rule.get('remote_ip_prefix')))
add_ports = set(updated_ports) - set(old_ports)

3
octavia/tests/unit/network/drivers/neutron/test_allowed_address_pairs.py
View File

@ -1071,7 +1071,8 @@ class TestAllowedAddressPairsDriver(base.TestCase):
fake_rules = [
{'id': 'rule-80', 'port_range_max': 80, 'protocol': 'tcp',
'remote_ip_prefix': '10.0.101.0/24'},
{'id': 'rule-22', 'port_range_max': 22, 'protocol': 'tcp'}
{'id': 'rule-22', 'port_range_max': 22, 'protocol': 'tcp'},
{'id': 'rule-None', 'port_range_max': 22},
]
list_rules = self.driver.network_proxy.security_group_rules
list_rules.return_value = fake_rules

5
releasenotes/notes/fix-attributeerror-when-securitygroup-rule-has-protocol-none-9b7217c5477d01b6.yaml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
---
fixes:
- |
Fixed potential AttributeError during listener update when security group
rule had no protocol defined (ie. it was null).